I'm replying to this without reading what is between page 2 & page 4, so sorry if I'm repeating what someone else has said...
NPO has repeatedly held itself to the standard of "FAN violated the terms because we said so". No proof, and constant repeating of the same lie in spite of our evidence to the contrary.
NPO failed to abide by IT'S requirements of the treaty, namely acting as a protector of FAN while FAN was disarmed.
NPO failed to abide by the treaty terms of only attacking FAN nations which were in violation of the treaty.
I know, these arguments have all been done 1000 times. The point is, almost everyone has seen through it by now. Yes, you're larger, you can enforce your vision of the rules on the basis of strength. We will always have our nations, our forums full of gun porn, and our pride.