Jump to content

Adelfidler

Members
  • Posts

    72
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Adelfidler

  1. Easy mistake. Going out of money is not to shame for. Any good alliance should have prepped all members for that. Selling tech, ? Come on guys, rapeing new members is not smart or clever.
  2. I am higher in rank I guess. I wish each party the best experience they could achieve without me. In Adel you should trust.
  3. Yes, , the OP seemed to close it for all and open for all. Given the judge is op and re as well I think it would be fair to assume that some may be confused by now.
  4. True. Wars need consideration. I think I am one of the most experienced in the game, true, I do move around a bit, please do not criticise a master player. Many talk about the good old days but have no idea further back than a week SE is no place to talk about how great a player thinks she is. It is governed by a few people that have sat around for too many rounds and sucked on teets too long. The real game is elsewhere. Find it
  5. you want trade or just stalking me?

  6. Those numbers do not count up the tech taken -in over the years from newbs I guess. No worries. SE is an easy game when we look at it that way. Create a nation, sell cheap tech , delete, since, repeat. Well done guys
  7. True. Killing a nation off is easy. Perhaps easier in one game over another.. Bunny states it is irrelevant for an a alliance post, hard to tell unless she agrees that the reason for the high stats is because of alliance help. Bunny must know how it works
  8. Problem I see is these stats were built up over many years which is rather easy to do.. There is no skill imo on on sitting on a nation and letting it build over the years. Many in an associated alliance may not be too enthused on paying for a nation to growth did nothing for the alliance. Nothing to be proud of I think..
  9. And therein lies the problem. The correct stats are available to anyone than cares to read them. Finding anyone smart enough to decipher properly takes a little longer I think. Lucky you guys have me to take a general view, and then investigate deeper on the truth.. You are always happy to run mouths these days and spout decorum and rules of war in the game, but the game effectively is what you desire. Initial game play was pretty simple back in the day, but the vets honed it. Many vets since left, or moved onto TE. Lets face it, top players know the game. Posting warchests becomes a crime? Not something I would do as first port of call, but we are in war games right? Would the nanny state suggest we do not use bullets next?
  10. do they not all? And therein lies the problem. The correct stats are available to anyone than cares to read them. Finding anyone smart enough to decipher properly takes a little longer I think. Lucky you guys have me to take a general view, and then investigate deeper on the truth.. You are always happy to run mouths these days and spout decorum and rules of war in the game, but the game effectively is what you desire. Initial game play was pretty simple back in the day, but the vets honed it. Many vets since left, or moved onto TE. Lets face it, top players know the game. Posting warchests becomes a crime? Not something I would do as first port of call, but we are in war games right? Would the nanny state suggest we do not use bullets next?
  11. Never thought that so many may agree by proxy by not having an opinion
  12. My vote has to go to - Alexandros, Batavia and Son of Taper. The timing was pretty much perfect for throwing top nations in an alliance into A without even launching a nuke. Some came close over the years but never close enough imo.
  13. Just a quick glance shows you have no idea. The award for top casualties went to Lee land last round alone, so catch you on a lie I get a pretty good idea you do not even know what the top casualties award is. Proof - https://tournament.cybernations.net/tournament_awards.asp?Page=4&Order=ASC&Field=AwardName&Round=60
  14. Bonkers idea. What next, force everyone to purchase nukes so as not to allow people to spy them away? Get a grip man.
  15. Perhaps I could have worded it differently. Forced to re roll due to inexperience suit you better?
  16. Hard to tell when the op refers to two different games. Pretty sure the opening line was a complaint about how hard it was to get trades. It then goes on to the suggestion that an easy way around blockades and gaining a navy general is thus;- "which simply requires sending one boat on a suicide run 3 times a day, for 5 days, and one is set for the rest of the round." Tevron could have pointed out the obvious flaw in that suggestion given a little more game experience, but failed to pick up on the flaw. ;o)
  17. I think I understand the game better than most. The issue you refer to on Levon/ op and "harbour abuse" trade is no different to a newb coming into the game and trying to get a trade. Back in the day all nations were stuck with initial trade sets and had to work hard to be nice to each other for continued trade. They were good days when TE had more than 100 nations in many alliances. What do we have now? Largest alliance with 27 members and just short of 110 total players?
  18. Most seasoned players know how Al runs a round. Turtle is not new to him. I have seen more than one round where he turtles and leave his alliance to pick up the pieces. Certain tricks to do certain stuff. Seasoned players know how it works, that is why Al tends to be a bit of a target each round. Sure it has little to game play.
  19. Different games. TBH, trades are not that hard in TE . I have 3 people that can trade atm. Blockades, yes, had a few this round but managed to pass them mostly back and with interest. Send me your TE name and I will try to hook you up. Whinging about trades whilst not showing your Alliance is not the fastest way to get a trade is it?
  20. Those tech deals look interesting. New players may care to consider it carefully. It may not ne the great deal it sounds when one try to purchase tech in the future.
×
×
  • Create New...