Jump to content

Bodvar Jarl

Members
  • Posts

    841
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Bodvaria
  • Alliance Name
    The Order of the Paradox
  • Resource 1
    Aluminum
  • Resource 2
    Spices

Bodvar Jarl's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I believe the mysterious pink elephant has been unveiled.
  2. Yeah, peace mode is for wusses :P PS: In Hoc Signo Vinces PPS: It's our house now.
  3. Platysphere is just catchy name we use(d) for an idea on the drawing board. But hey, don't let me stop your amusing mixture of wild speculation and assuming that we're a bunch of slimy malicious plotters that would happily see Digiterra burn if we can be kings of the ashes...to be fair, we'll happily burn Digiterra to the ground if we can be kings of the ashes, but aside from that, we're generally nice people.
  4. You know, this would be amusing if I had not already read it with full awareness of the context these things was said in. Fun part is that everything in the screens are us speculating on what we should do next (and much of it is outdated) or otherwise stuff that we'd tell people if they cared to ask nicely for it. Oh, and apparently, I'm still important enough to get a red box around some of the stuff I write. :D
  5. We paint ourselves as better because you outnumber us, yet we are still matching you, blows for blows. Chest thumping is all we ever have done on the OWF, it is all we ever will do. As for diplomatic failure, this goes in cycles, this time we are on the side with the numerical disadvantage, next time, several of those in your current coalition will find themselves in that position, and the time after that others will be there, eventually, so will you. Assuming of course that there is still enough life on Digiterra for all this to continue for long enough. However, given the cards dealt to us and you for this particular round, I'll stake the claim that we play better. I say we are entitled to be a bit full of ourselves right now.
  6. We shouldn't go bash Pacifica too much, they are doing the noble thing here, relieving the burden of eating all the hurt that their allies are unwilling to take in order to defeat us. I take this as a compliment, our enemies outnumber us 7 to 1 and still require more fodder for their human waves. Far be it for me to suggest that they are incompetent.
  7. [quote name='Timberland' timestamp='1358780334' post='3082255'] Hey TOP how about a no nuke war ? /me evil laughs [/quote] Where's the fun in that?
  8. You know, the trolling used to be of higher quality and quantity back in the good old days. Oh well, time to see if there's still some fun to be had.
  9. Last war Paradoxia took part in where the CB or legal acrobatics involved in pulling it off weren't questioned by anyone (aside from those we declared against and a couple of OWF idiots, though there were surprisingly few of even those that decided to open their mouth about it) was like five years ago. As for the wars where Paradoxia did not take part, there's precious few that did not have it's fair share of tactics that those in opposition declared to be vile and horrible. So, meh, we need war every now and then, honestly, better quality would be much desired, but when everybody wants to be on the winning side, and all those not on it do their best to cut their losses....if we wanted clear cut CB's and just causes and that sort of crap we could just as well be playing sim city. Someone said that Apparatus had open slots for us to fill, and really, we didn't mind. Looks like Umbrella has been famished in the fighting department for a while, not much left to us by their ravenous appetite, but we'll see when the buffet is refilled.
  10. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1336856995' post='2966616'] I do not agree that standards have been applied evenly and it doesn't only apply to who you think I'm getting at. [/quote] VE's goals and objectives diverge significantly more from ours than those of any of our remaining treaty partners, so I don't know what standards you're looking at. But suit yourself.
  11. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1336854620' post='2966588'] Need to get my shots in: if only such a critical approach was taken to all of TOP's allies. [/quote] They passed the test.
  12. [quote name='Richard VII' timestamp='1336850876' post='2966568'] Summer is coming. Just thought I'd say that since we went through a year or two of winter jokes. Good luck with your plans TOP and VE. [/quote] Nah, just a year of false spring.
  13. I can assure you, greed plays no part in this at all.
  14. [quote name='hizzy' timestamp='1330010396' post='2926666'] feel free to read my [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=109189&view=findpost&p=2926341]other reply[/url] [/quote] Which changes what? Either, you think reps are a valid option or you do not. Though to claim Polar did not have this war, and it's resolution coming their way is to stick your head in the sand. Posting things such as 75% of the number they currently might possess is insane is to use the simpleton's argument of a big number to illustrate the severity of the terms. If Polar had 1000 tech, yet 200 nations, would asking for 750 tech be draconic? Post all you like about your thoughts about the effect the demand of reparation has on the community and it's alliances, but seriously, spare us from tossing out some numbers to underline the point of "evil, tyrannical and draconian demands" while then claiming that said number is irrelevant.
×
×
  • Create New...