Jump to content

Lucius Optimus

Banned
  • Posts

    1,400
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by Lucius Optimus

  1. 4 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

     

    M Inc News has always been factual Lucious, if it wasn't it wouldn't have continually beat the apathy report in ratings. People listen to M Inc news because it's a nonpropoganda machine aimed and providing facts only. As for if I'm okay, best shape of my life.

     

     

    Factual maybe in your own mind. This is a good format for you it's all driven by "passion" if i could call it that. 

     

    and are you sure? i'm gonna compare to you last newscast where you called Banned bad names. 

     

     

    Previously on Minc news 

     https://clyp.it/nip0dq2v

  2. First I'll say your analysis is thoughtful, clearly you put in the time.  There are some big gaps in your understanding that are plugged with bias or speculation, but thats not entirely unexpected. It is by far the most interesting region of Bob right now, and being an outsider is going to lend itself to speculation and assumptions.  

     

    I won't repeat everything GK said as he hit many of the big points, but some of your claims I do resent. You can DM me to discuss if you want. 

    i'll give a 4 of 5 

     

    Its thoughtful and a good read even with the holes, and this kind of content is always appreciated 

     

    thank you 

  3. 3 hours ago, Knights of the Grail said:

    Credit is due to Lord Hitchcock for a new idea.  So, this is more like a sports league?

     

     

    We need more round tables.

     

    My questions are:

    1. How do you extricate your league from large-alliance politics? For example, the aid package from a large alliance to yours.

    2. Are Knights of Ni, UCR, and LSF now considered micro-alliances?

     

    Thank you, and good luck.

    This is not that new idea we've all talked about it at some point. General Kanabis spurred people by making a new discord. 

     

    Micros need their own voice we wanna give it to them 

     

    It's theirs for the taking 

     

     

  4. 2 hours ago, Blackatron said:

    Is gravedigging a thing for blogs?

     

    I don't know. I do know that most of this came true in the end. It took more than a year and things happened it a strange way, but they happened. The main difference however was that no voter intimidation/movement was required, all that was needed was time for LPCN to decline naturally, Hardin helped it along the way (when Junka inevitably proclaims victory over the LPCN all its sympathisers can blame him) but it was only a matter of time.

     

    Also Meth's warchest didn't last months, it was literally like 3 weeks.

    Yes for some reason everyone took forever to implement anythinglike this, and they let LPC sanction first. 

     

    This was written at a time when LPC nations were similarly beat down. I assumed that the coalition would want to destroy them right away before they built up again. But alas...everyone decided to fight the Dre4m War over and over again for more than a year (I think 3 LPC wars since Dre4m war) . It has really held some people back.

  5. Here's something to think about- and personally, I enjoy your blog- one thing we can agree on is that 'micro AAs' are for lack of a better term, more fun.

    With that, let's examine what this war is even called, "the dre4m war".

    Named after a member who isn't even fighting anymore- he gave up.

    So a war that he started and a war that your side is backing isn't even part of the war anymore- so now ask yourself, why are you still fighting the dre4m war named after a person who isn't even supporting it himself.

    Bottom line, some sort of ego boost that will enevitably cause more purges and exterminations from both sides that aren't neccessary and in the long run will hurt you more than it will hurt us.

    I think STRIPES is in the war because of the two waves of Minc attacks more than anything else. The official statement from Walsh said that SRA wasn't going to war with LN, but he never condemned the actions of Dre4mweaver.

    I think the war should have been over when the BC broke up. Meth would have walked away with a senate seat, and SRA would have devastated the Meth Coalition with the option to resume the conflict later if they wanted to. The problem with giving the Meth side white peace then (as it is now) is that once it is granted your coalition will parade it around as a great victory and my side may lose face. In truth it is only half a victory (see part 1).

    Both sides should stop talking about how wronged they have been by the wars, take a step back and look. Look at the long term consequences of dragging this war out for rest of 2015. So stop throwing the phrase permawar around and maybe Dre4mers won't talk about extermination.

    I challenge you to talk to Meth and just ask him to stop making this war all about how wronged he has been. Get him to talk about a minimum one month ceasefire. I challenge you to de-escalate this war. You continue the Dre4m War as you plan to, and I promise you EVERYONE will lose. No one will win the Dre4m War without great cost to newer players/ our precious micros.

  6. and it is bitter... very bitter- the fact is that while your side pretends the war is going well- in reality they didn't expect us to perma war their noobs..

    why? because it's war. It will drag on for years (I hope) until your side accepts the peace we offered.

    and that's it. they can carry on about their demands all they want- and the ever bitterness is that they are now in no shape to negotiate- they pretend to be- but hey, bills are cheap and we can fight for ever

    You can stop repeating what I have already said in the blog now.

    Phrases like Permawar and "extermination" are being thrown around far to often when this war is discussed. Would you believe that I actually don't want to "exterminate" the Meth party, and I don't want to drive anyone from CN either. But I would see you beaten...oh yes. I want you so badly defeated that history will have no right to try and question it. But you waging a perma war on new nation will drive just as many from CN as your extermination would. Both sides need to wake up and smell the roses. However, I have the feeling that neither side I ready for peace.

  7. When you are talking about ways to end an aggressive war from your side against mine and you don't even spend a single sentence on any option that doesnt involve exterminating us, I think it's appropriate to point that out.

    WRONG! read the thing! The first paragraph is all about how your side has to fight it. Don't blame me for how few options you appear to have from the eyes of the observer. Towards the end I mention delaying the war. And this is part of a series, THE LAST PART talks about outcomes and how the war may conclude.

    Wow...this post isn't called "The ever bitter Dre4m War" for nothing...

×
×
  • Create New...