Jump to content

kalev60

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    33

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by kalev60

  1. kalev60
    And here I was thinking that Oculus is one of the greatest villains that Bob has never seen killing the game and just going around slapping lesser AA's or blocks and does not need no mono-toned chants about how great, good and pure it is
  2. kalev60
    Well happy birthday and stay classy!
  3. kalev60
    A And here i was under the impregnation of that the ideology was: "Yes CN is dead, WE killed it!" Oh, well time to lurk away now.
  4. kalev60
    Sweet sort of o/!
  5. kalev60
    Next year just declare on some one, burn a punch of pixel in a day, then back off and call it april's fools joke.
  6. kalev60
    o/ Love the reference!
  7. kalev60
    One aid slot of tech against one aid slot of money seems fair. I don't care about the content of slot more than is it the max i can send or receive. I care about whether i have open slots or not.
  8. kalev60
    Happy birth day!
  9. kalev60
    Shout out to Magicboyd25 just because i was one of "few more of our guys to hit him". You where clearly overwhelmed but still bothered to do some damage, that sadly can't be said about everyone i have fought so far.
  10. kalev60
    Degenerated Lulzist artistic expression does not make much sense to civilized nations. To be brutally honest with you Tywin, neither does a hulked out Homer breaking through a red carpet which was meant to be walked on. But maybe i am just not civilized enough to get it.
  11. kalev60
    Good luck and have fun!
  12. kalev60
    No civilized Alliance can really dictate a nation whom to sell their tech, what makes Polar think they can?
  13. kalev60
    Forget Ubuntu, this here reminds me of Buckaroo more then anything else.
  14. kalev60
    o/ Pacifica!
  15. kalev60
    My two cents on neutrality: is see neutraly as a non agression statement( AA says that they will not attack nobody, they will not get involved in any war exept to defend themselves) so defensive agreement between neutral AA' s would be ok in my book, besides the neutral AA would not trigger that agreement that would be on the agressors job to trigger it so all the consequenses of attackers choises would be on attacker. I also think that any AA neutral or not has a perfectly justified CB to declare on DBDC on the bases of the right to defend themselves because the raid on neutrals illustrates how unpredictable DBDC is and how they like to break rules. I would not be shocked to see DBDC jump on some of their allies if they grow big enough. But until there is a power strong enough out there to take on DBDC, this talk here is pointless anyways.
  16. kalev60
    For a small nation owner like me those 6 ones are again improvements for the bigger guys who fall down to my range and can murder me with those even better now. The deletion clause to collect only makes things worst for smaller nations struggling with slots to get Barracks, Guerrilla Camp and Factories up before conflicts. Also deleting them, then collecting even after 20 days during war, then rebuilding them after,deleting them, then collecting again after 20 days - I just will not have the funds do to that even if i haven't done no mistakes using my WC during the war. So dislike from me for a simpel reason: i can not afford to use them, i could only maybe use them for the first 20 days of a conflict after that they will become weapons against me.
  17. kalev60
    As tech dealer let me provide a little advice to you Tywin. In CN you just can not write victor´s history because the "losing side" just doesn´t go away and shut up. You can call it term or restrictions on nations who where hiding from war or financial sanctions but the "losing side" will always see it as reparations or embargo not on the 30 nations but also on those nations who are tempentend on those 30 nations also.
  18. kalev60
    Could you imagen the treaty web on Mogar community? Which Mogar is allied to which Mogar? Oh, the sweet chaos and confusion it would be! :frantic:
  19. kalev60
    New nation rulers are corrupted by Lannister, as made evident by the recent blog post by Loki Laufeyson titled, I Have Been a Fool. You only make him look like the Aristotle, he is not.
  20. kalev60
    With out people like Tywin, buckaroo, La Marxs and the lil blond lady from game of thrones I would not visit this forum at all. All the info I need, i can get from other places.
  21. kalev60
    Feeding the troll: Complete victory forever is it not the global stability you have ranted about ow so long now!
  22. kalev60
    Wouldn`t it be fun if a winning side would but terms of some their AA´s for shitty war performance or whatnot? Or determine who wins or loses strictly by looking at alliance vs alliance damage stats :ehm:? No, not always the case, it just means there where a lot of "idiots" against you, plus usually idiots don`t beat up their own kind! :smug:
  23. kalev60
    The only difference i can think of between flat out pay day for "winners" or loser burning their money and restrictions set on aid for certain nations is in pay day scenario losing side will help to make opposite side stronger, on burning money scenario winners can get stronger on their own and the losers will suffer a more slower growth rate. Basically losing side loses on both times, saying a mandarin isn`t an orange may be correct but one can also argue that they are pretty similar things.
  24. kalev60

    Very meta.

    kalev60 commented on YOLO SWAG's blog entry in channel yolon blog

    And next on CN politics is blocking someone blog visibility enough reason to start a war in-game?
  25. kalev60
    Join today! Bump...
×
×
  • Create New...