Aegon Targaryen

An idiot. Now, if we could return to the topic at hand.

I'm actually gonna disagree with this. If your nation can't fight competently for whatever reason then you should stay in PM. Why take unnecessary damage simply to prove one is brave about losing pixels?:P To be honest, his opinion and statements should not be judged by his decision to remain in PM. Attack the statement, not the person making it.

Alliances should go to war based on their own interests. It's why I have no issue with why IRON's actions. The gov of IRON made a decision that was in the best interests of their own members and that is the way it should be. IRON's gov is accountable to their membership, not so and so's gov in a coalition channel. That doesn't mean I support the methods used by IRON but I can certainly support and understand the reasoning for their actions.

Breaking news! It's called war. It doesn't have to be fair, you NPO folks know this better than most.

Stockholm lapdog syndrome.

Good luck IRON.

So basically what you are saying is IRON in response to the LoSS attack were attempting to apply a band aid to a ten inch laceration that they, IRON had helped create in the first place?

To be honest, I can't find fault with IRON's logic. NG made their bed, IRON warned them about the consequences yet NG still expected IRON to hop in the bed beside them when the going got rough? How on any level of intelligence is considered a rational thought? That's like having a friend get in a car after drinking a bottle of scotch and forcing you to get in with him because he doesn't want to be alone when he wraps the front end of the car around a tree. Madness.

You have us confused with IRON :P

o/ Pax Paradoxica

-6.93%!!! But I thought we weren't doing our fair share of fighting? :P

Somehow strangely applicable......

Every treaty regardless of its clauses is optional to an extent.

These early spam topics on the maroon team sub forum have finally paid off!

Why am I not surprised.