Jump to content

Gh0s7

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    293

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Gh0s7

  1. Gh0s7
    Best of luck! I'm sure this will be a more successful iteration or your previous home, abd I know you guys are active and engaged enough to make something really cook with the group you have. I look forward to seeing your success!
  2. Gh0s7
    I'm having the same issue trading with Donnie. My nation link is: https://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=624696 I'm not sure if it's because I play CN from my phone?
  3. Gh0s7
    Welcome to (more) fun! Happy hunting
  4. Gh0s7
    It's okay, he's free to do the same to you, given he's not a government member. So let the mutual trolling continue
  5. Gh0s7
    I'm pretty sure he's already said that what he's posting are his own views and nit those of hersh, so I dont think I need to labor that point any further
  6. Gh0s7
    I'm amused it has ti be said, but unless it's coming from government, it should not be taken as an official position of our alliance. And most of your statements do not, in fact, originate from our government. So you have 2 points you can drive home. Feel free to hammer away at those
  7. Gh0s7
    Lol, are we ignoring 'longest allies'? If he leaked the members chat, you'd see me and Hersh defending them every step of the way. And in the end, Hershey uktimately.makes all decisions within our alliance. We can express our opinions, but he is the one that makes any and all decisions. It's nice to see Armen is a snake though
  8. Gh0s7
    OG legit has 1 guy out of PM and OBR has 9 out of 26 nations out of PM. And If it was just upper tier nations outside of PM there'd be a valid argument that a strategy might be employed, but it rings true for every tier in OBR. The ferocious blitz is nit in the least bit Intimidating. If this is all they have ti show fir the effort they probably should've just stayed uninvolved. I'm not impressed my the measure of their resolve.
  9. Gh0s7
    Its generally poor form to post warchests on the OWF like that. I will also say that quite a few defensive wars continue without so much as a CM, as 2/3rds of my wars currently stand. One of them was completely fine with down declaring on a guy with 2 econ wonders and maybe 100 days old? But there are also plenty of instances where you guys are also fighting. Just keep that in mind before throwing around disputable stats.
  10. Gh0s7
    Lol, this is just kind of sad, but I expect nothing less from MHA. I'll have fun wailing on you guys
  11. Gh0s7
    Which DS ally might you be reffering to? I'm genuinely curious
  12. Gh0s7
    You use that excuse when it's convenient and ignore it when its convenient. DT is also referred to as Doom, and yet they were left out. It's disingenuous and you know it, but I also acknowledge you'll probably quit this world before you'll ever confess to it. So we'll see you on the war screen.
  13. Gh0s7
    Just to be clear, a pre emotive strike is not defensive. We're fine with a war, but trying to call it a defensive war when neither DS nor DW attacked any of the parties involved is far fetched at best. And I don't think FTW or NATO were directly attacked by DBDC? Regardless, this adds fun an excitement, so let's have it.
  14. Gh0s7
    That's as if saying roll for damage declared on us. DBDC declared an open ended war 2 years ago, and you took the opportunity to take a shot at mostly DW/DS, who weren't even around at the time of said declaration. I'm curious what form of mental gymnastics you're using here
  15. Gh0s7
    I'm sorry, I'm just finding a hard time findinf the DS sigs on that DoW. Although that's mostly because DS didn't exist at the time. Could you, by chance, help me locate them? Having said that, it dies appear as though you coward from then for 2 years, so I mean...
  16. Gh0s7
    I'm voting for this tbh. I'm game for waiting, but Herogasim is a fairly stupid name dictated by maybe 3 alliances? Not sure people should be acting like the names already been decided. Those alliances are free to refer to it however they want, but for community purposes, the name isn't decided.
  17. Gh0s7
    What, then, was your point in referencing Invicta not asking for help? I thought it was to indicate we couldn't fight, but clearly that's not what you were trying ti say, so maybe clarify your point?
  18. Gh0s7
    A thoroughly devastating response. I'm sure in your mind, that witty retort made your actions more honorable or brave
  19. Gh0s7
    Lol, Invicta lost significantly more NS than we did, and we absolutely contributed to Alpha Wolves, given it was at leadt me, Stone, Claude and Hersh, and probably a few others, but I think our mid tier was bogged down on Fark, while our power tier was still focusing heavily on Polar. We entered to give you guys a boisterous, which isnprobably why the so effectively touched a nerve. We also just reformed about a year ago, and have been fighting Red Alert, and were literally in the process of grinding warchests in tech, which I'm sure even you would acknowledge as an actual war. But the only thing that matters is what fits your narrative, right? I'd ask you what 'real' war you've fought in the last 6 years, but I know which one you will refer to, and as I've heard from many people your ego inflates the contribution your alliance gave. But by all means, continue raving like a lunatic
  20. Gh0s7
    Lol, you had 200 guys against what? Less than 100? And we've already been at war for 60 days. And despite of outnumbering us 2 to 1, we still declared almost as many wars against you as you did to us, despite you guys having literally planned the blitz. Cute, but the only thing superior about FTW is the size of its ego.
  21. Gh0s7
    You seem to have forgotten Doom War, wheb we fought Polar, ISX, Legion, SUN, Invicta, amd Alpha Wolves, to name a few. It's a cute pot shot, but false all the same.
  22. Gh0s7
    If you believe rules were broken, there is an avenue to report that. Otherwise what you're doingnis baseless speculation, so come back with concrete proof and a report, and focus in the subject at hand. Appreciated. Sorry, but people have been accusing each other over this crap for decades, and these claims rarely have any substance. And this is not the place for that kind of discussion
  23. Gh0s7
    Lol, do you want to do a count in the number of individual nations you guys sent? 25 FTW, with 11 before update. Out of 155 Nato 9, with 6 before update. Out of 51
  24. Gh0s7
    Welcome to the fray, CLAWS o7
  25. Gh0s7
    I dont join in these topics often, but just to be clear, DT has been Doom since at around 2014, when we allied them as Doomsquad, and when DBDC signed their treaty. They're not /trying/ to be doom; they are doom. And they've been some of our best allies throughout that time. You want to bash Polar, carry on. But DTs ties to Doom are not a subject you are educated on.
×
×
  • Create New...