Jump to content

xNiccix

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Republika Hrvatska
  • Alliance Name
    Non Grata
  • Resource 1
    Spices
  • Resource 2
    Sugar

xNiccix's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I never said that you were only referring to one single post. If you go read my initial response you will see that I clearly underlined "and other NG members". Your views would obviously be biased so I won't even comment on that. They are not two different things because Nigras will (for the time being) be in an active war, until this issue is resolved (which like I said would be when peace has been negotiated and agreen upon, or when his nation is deleted due to bill lock). I don't see how you got the idea that I'm offended or threatened though? Please explain this to me... I'm too dumb to get the quote to work correctly, but in the above quote you quoted a member of NG saying he will aid Nigras when he gets peace from the NG government, and you also called that a double standard (and this is somehow to also relate to me saying how the NpO government and members have double standards), please explain this as well, as I fail to see the relation. Regarding the bold text, EXACTLY THIS. This is the double standard I'm talking about... An NpO member invited Nigras to join the alliance that he is in, this is not an official government policy, so why does the NpO government take the opinions of a NG member as the official government position of NG? If an NpO member is going to post sarcastic/cheeky/untrue (etc.) posts here, obviously they will be open for trolling, not only by NG members, but also by a great number of people from other alliances. You're only pointing out NG to play the victim here, poor you, poor you. I don't think the NG government has ever tried to censor their members. NG members are free to air their own opinions on the OWF. It's up to the reader to decide what to do with those opinions. PS: I keep underlining important words so that you don't get confused, but it seems as though you still jump off the wagon and continue with your agenda, whatever that may be. This is the final reply that I will give. PSS: Because NpO members & government fail to diferentiate between a member's personal opinion and official policy, the above mentioned text is my own opinion and not the official position the NG government and it also doesn't mean that all NG members agree with my opinion, as it is mine and mine alone.
  2. When this is resolved then obviously there would be no active wars on the war page of Do a barrel roll. (his nation). When there is no active wars declared on/by the nation of Do a barrel roll. then it is obviously resolved. The issue cannot be resolved without peace being negotiated and agreed upon. See how that works? My statement is correct and even if not, it's not really what my statement was about. My statement was about the double standards that exist. I love purple donkeys. Does that mean the NG government also loves purple donkeys? No. You quote SSK and other NG members and take it as the official position of the Non Grata government. The problem here is you read too much into things, in fact quite a number of members from NpO read too much into things. If you want to read things the wrong way then frankly that's your own problem. We can't make you read things differently. One member from NpO tells a NG member to "Do something about it", but when a NG member tells a NpO member to "Do something out it" it's all of the sudden very threatening and NG only dishes out threats at NpO? C'mon... And I understand irony very well, thank you.
  3. That's not very threatening. If you think "Do something about it" is threatening, well, then I have nothing to say to you other than I feel sorry for you. In fact, quite a few members from NpO told NG members to "come do something about it", so very ironic. I've read through all of the pages, and if I had the patience time I would quote each statement which I have a problem with. What I can tell is that a lot of people from other alliances comment on NpO's coalition history and then members from NpO say it's "NG, if you have a problem with NpO's coalition" blah blah blah... Also very ironic that one member from NpO said that Nigras should join NpO after his wars expire, and when he got called out for that, NpO took the stance that he is only a member and it's not the official response from NpO government... but when a member from NG gives his opinion then the leader of NpO talks about "NG" saying this and that. It's just very ironic. So, if it's not a comment/statement from a government official, don't take it as NG's position on things.
×
×
  • Create New...