Anarcho Jesse

[quote name='jonnygozy' date='19 February 2010 - 05:03 PM' timestamp='1266599001' post='2192159'] Whose optional aggression are you referring to? GOONS attacked NATO first, and UCN has an MDoAP with NATO through CDT. [/quote] These are facts. They have no place in discussions pertaining to CyberNations.

[quote name='helstrm' date='19 February 2010 - 03:20 PM' timestamp='1266592815' post='2192033'] Because Anarcho Jesse harshed our mellow in the celebration of peace... Haiku, and a rhyming couplets. [/quote] This is a celebration of extortion for following through on a treaty obligation, you deluded child.

[quote name='Gerald Meane' date='19 February 2010 - 03:41 AM' timestamp='1266550898' post='2191250'] Considering the number of alliances goons has helped to get out of the conflict, and the number lsf has gotten out I'd say the one doing worthless posturing is you. Good luck with those surrender terms. [/quote] The LSF is not a large alliance. Yet, for the seeming insignificance that we're being told we have, we still haven't been pushed out of the war. Why do you think this is?

[quote name='JT Jag' date='19 February 2010 - 03:38 AM' timestamp='1266550696' post='2191239'] LSF offensive wars declared on GOONS: 24 OH MY GOODNESS YOU'RE TAKING US DOWN SINGLE-HANDEDLY [/quote] I never suggested such a thing. Reading comprehension must not be your strong suit.

[quote name='Voodoo Nova' date='19 February 2010 - 03:32 AM' timestamp='1266550350' post='2191219'] Bragging that you were the sole reason that their top nations fell makes you look extremely foolish, especially when your allies are fighting them as well. [/quote] I never stated we were the sole reason. I'm simply suggesting that the GOONS are good at a bunch of worthless posturing considering we've done more damage to them then they have to us.

[quote name='JT Jag' date='19 February 2010 - 03:25 AM' timestamp='1266549906' post='2191185'] Yeah that wouldn't end up well. My advice: Wish for a viceroy. [/quote] Listen neckbeard, we've already given you a pretty good shaving. I mean, your bottom heavy alliance has done nothing to us-- yet we've managed to drag down most of your top nations.

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' date='19 February 2010 - 03:24 AM' timestamp='1266549850' post='2191179'] ...its basically a token sum. One day of war easily destroys more than that. [/quote] We have a bit more self-respect than to pay anything for following through on a treaty obligation.

[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='19 February 2010 - 03:22 AM' timestamp='1266549734' post='2191169'] For attacking GOONS. I sure do hope you'll be paying a similar figure too! [/quote] You'll never get that kind of cash from the LSF. We'd rather go into a perma-war.

Why on earth are you paying 150 million?

Areilah (http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=196851) managed to send not just one, not two, but SEVEN nukes my way in one day (screen cap: http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/7390/nukebug.png). Thankfully, my SDI caught all of them, but I might not be so fortunate next time. I hope this is resolved soon.

Still looking for sellers! Get in while the goin's good!

DO YOU DESIRE TO TRADE OBSCENE AMOUNTS OF TECH FOR OBSCENE AMOUNTS OF CASH? NO? THEN GET OUT, WHY ARE YOU EVEN HERE. But if you answered yes, pay attention closely and act quickly-- I only have so many slots to fill (giggity)! If you want to make some good cash, grow strong, and be well-liked, sell your soul to the corporate sector, eat your Wheaties, and be a weak-willed push-over. But if you want to make some extra pixels, all you have to do is guarantee that you can provide 50 tech every 10 days on the button! What are the benefits, you ask? Well, let me list them for you: Every 10 days in an alternating fashion, you send me 50 tech or I send you 3 million cash. If you're ever in a defensive war that isn't related to alliance obligations, I will personally bankroll you and contribute the maximum amount of aid that I can. Your pain is my pain. Mi casa su casa, su casa mi casa. When it begins to become unprofitable for you to keep selling tech and our arrangement draws to a close, you will be given the option of receiving either 2 tech or 2 million cash (your choice!) for each transaction we had! That's right! By working with me, you're insuring yourself a little something for the future! So act now, and get in on this while you still can!

I'll do gold and coal.

Shoot traitors.

satanists-- I know you haven't read my messages yet, probably, but the terms of surrender are as lenient as I think I can be. I would prefer a mutual relationship based on exchange and understanding to be the product of this war, not a smoldering nation that has had a lot of time put into its growth, or even worse, two smoldering nations.

I'm hoping to see some more mutualist/left-libertarian alliances sprout up afterwards in Red. Anyone down for jump starting one with me?

I can totally get behind points, 1., 2., and eating poor children.

FCC, LSF, ALE, or maybe try and start my own with buddies that I knew outside the game.

Functionally what Amp said. I think all socioeconomic theories are valid in the context of anarchism so long as they remain voluntary at their very premise, but I'm more of a preferential mutualist in terms of what I think will work best.

I think individual surrender terms should be made up by the two actually fighting. If anything, they know each other better than their superiors. Put the terms of the war in the hands of those involved in the bloodshed.

[ooc:I've been chilling out with NORML and SSDP guys up from DC all day] Yeah. Could use some work, but the jist is felt in the thrust. Right? Right.

Neither, and I say it for this reason-- as an organization, it has the right to exist. For that, it shouldn't be abolished. However, their behavior is certainly something that cannot be let go by, so the only solution I can think for that is simply reducing them to zero infrastructure. In the future, instances like today could be best avoided if when alliances made broad sweeps for power (like the Moldavi and Revenge Doctrines), each other alliance should step up and say "That won't stand". Liberty, should always come first.

Sure. The NPO is a belligerent, in almost ever scenario in which it has been at war. War, is the anti-thesis of prosperity, co-operation, and growth. NPO, by going to war, has willingly acknowledged that none of these things for others (but still wanting them for themselves) are in their interest. IRON has done the same thing, but abiding by such flagrant violations of such humane goals.

IRON wouldn't be here if it had exercised reason and sensibility, and refrained from joining the tyrannous NPO.

Should watch your step next time, IRON.