[quote name='Kestral' timestamp='1348066889' post='3031836']
So basically you're upset that Int didn't offer help that you were then intending to refuse anyway? Unless you're saying that you'd like only Int to have burned for something for which they bore no responsibility...
Int held a MDoaP with you, you attacked aggressively, they decided not to bring all their allies (inc CnG) into the firing line to help with your aggressive (and quite honestly cowardly - I mean spying like that? really?) crusade.
I get that it would have given you that warm fuzzy feeling if they'd decided to sacrifice their allies to OPTIONALLY assist your foolishness so that you could be all like 'Oh no, we don't want you to get involved anyway' and feel like you've somehow saved your allies from a threat (which you created), but to try and drag their name through the dirt after all they did to try and help you out of your own mess? To be honest I'm just glad this treaty went, Int deserve better.
[/quote]
Read the discussion. LSF is stating that they had talks with Int about a war against the fascists. They did not expect other treaty partners, who did not have ideological issues with the fascists, to support them. They did however expect certain contributions from their treaty partner The International. The International failed to deliver for whatever reason and that treaty is cancelled as a result.
Various people will have various theories as why The International unsurprisingly failed to deliver, but the point is that LSF felt they had a certain understanding how a specific treaty would chain. They did have expectations regarding how others would opt to chain and thus they remain on good terms with them.