Steve

o/ Duckroll I like the direction this is headed.

3/50 tech deal offered Long term preferred Reputable and reliable. Never missed a payment, even during wars. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=469772

[quote name='smurthwaite' timestamp='1341641482' post='3005668'] And Alchemy. [/quote] In all honesty, I forgot Alchemy.

[quote name='Garion' timestamp='1341622622' post='3005333'] You fought NPL together with GOONS and Umbrella... and since when NPL in MK books is a decent opponent? Nevermind the fact that they had probably 500k NS altogether. [/quote] Don't forget the valuable contribution of valiant EUROPA who aided DH in defeating the hoards of NPL!

[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1341588446' post='3004814'] The consequences of implicitly supporting the nuking of our applicants by being members of that alliance. [/quote] ^^ This is just [s]plain dumb[/s] a poor attempt at rationalization (fyi rationalization means trying to make what you did "the right thing to do"). I can only assume that "nuking of our applicants" refers to the targeting on Dave93 for ZI. I am unaware of any other MK "applicant" that was nuked by CSN - please enlighten me if I am misinformed (a.k.a. "tell me I'm wrong"). CSN explicitly warned Dave93 that he was a ZI target before he sought protection and MK made an exception to its own charter to create the "crisis" - no need to revisit that issue. Instead of targetting the "offending" nations, MK declares war on the entire alliance - no problem there, its an alliance's perogrative. But PLEASE don't try to argue that nations in alliances allied to CSN somehow deserve a hypothetical "beat down" because they are members of an alliance that has treaties with an alliance (or part of a bloc, etc.). That's just ignorant. Look what you are actually saying: [members of)particular group] deserve [violent consequences] because the support [bad thing (usually imaginary)] by being [members of particular group] [b]Now MADLIB that mofo with an ethnicity, gender, or any other group for hours of pogrom inducing fun[/b]. [Hippies] deserve [to be washed] because they support [free love] by being [hippies]. [SF] deserves [to be destroyed as a bloc] because they support [nuking of MK applicants] by being [SF].

[quote name='Crownguard' timestamp='1341413423' post='3003399'] It's a "sexual experience enhancement device". Just think of the possibilities! I'm sure Dr. Oz will get around to reviewing it. Someday. [/quote] Beer goggles also enhance the sexual experience. Turning 4s into 10s for centuries.

[IMG]http://i1153.photobucket.com/albums/p502/awhiteesq/lbj-meme.jpg[/IMG]

[quote name='smurthwaite' timestamp='1340983573' post='3000005'] Not worth your time. I hear they are a parking lot. [/quote] With a new speedbump! (tR)

Good luck NADC with the LeBron haters. o/ LBJ - League and Finals MVP o/ Miami Heat - 2012 NBA CHAMPIONS

[quote name='Akama' timestamp='1340846674' post='2998904'] This was unexpected. Not that tR is surrendering, but that they are surrendering so quickly. Congratulations NPL on getting the first surrender of the war. [/quote] Want to see this in the war WIKI!

How do you make Mushrooms grow?

In all seriousness, I must say that the few tR members I've chatted with show good loyalty to their alliance. tR leadership should be ashamed for drawing their members into a conflict with no real purpose, against a well prepared and experienced enemy. The predictable result is the grind down of the rank and file of the alliance. This lack of concern for their members is reprehensible on the part of tR gov. I applaud those tR nations that continue to fight on their way to ZI even though they have been offered the option of an honorable individual surrender. o/ non-gov members of tR (more meat for the grinder)

[quote name='dejarue' timestamp='1340685067' post='2996638'] Wha-huh? I thought the whole grounds for this was to see if SF would "defend" us. If your whole aim was to hit, and then quickly seek peace, how does this serve the ends of hitting and seeing if you could hit hard enough, for long enough, to invoke a defensive move by SF? Can you keep your story straight for even a day? [/quote] 1 day seems to be their limit.

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1340656024' post='2996127'] [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?View=Charts&Alliance=The%20Resistance"]Its looks like they may be required real soon. You've already lost 5% of your NS.[/url] [/quote] [IMG]http://images2.makefive.com/images/entertainment/culture/top-5-nerds/urkel-7.jpg[/img] [size="7"]Did I do that? -NPL[/size]

o/ MCXA (and its "slow jam" I believe)