BrJLa

Is this how I found out I got traded?

Man, last war you took so much pride in how you were just freelancing on the Polar side. All I know is Pacifica likes fighting. We broke a pretty good record lately for the most wars declared in a day. That's the stat I'm proud of.

Man, it's seriously not that hard to have a favorable damage ratio. Be motivated to be on at update. Check in multiple times a day. Be a little clever. Managing your deployments helps. That's it. Most rulers are not that motivated to be good at war. Running around punching people who don't care as much isn't that impressive.

Last war, NpO insisted that just because their coalition wanted reps didn't necessarily mean Polaris cared about reps. Just because our coalition wants to hit Polar, that doesn't necessarily mean NPO cares whether we hit Polar.

Hmm. My recollection is that the message early on to all our allies was, "You have to peace out, you have to peace out, you have to peace out, we can't even begin to discuss how NPO will get peace until all its allies peace out." Which then turned in to, "Let us be clear. NPO is not getting out without terms."

To his credit, he successfully anarchied all three of them.

Congrats ODN and NATO.

Yeah, you probably don't belong on the list. They're in an entirely different league.

Danaerys is the very worst. Tywin is second worst. Malkavian is third worst.

Tywin will PM you an essay on the subject, but here's a link to read up on it in the meantime: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/120605-what-is-neo-imperialist-moralism-an-lnn-special-investigation/

Tywin is the village idiot, and politics don't really work like that on Bob. Politics here revolve around the wars we have once or twice a year, and what you think of the powers that be, and what you think about how different alliances have conducted themselves in both recent and ancient history. And it takes a long time to figure things out, because people refer to different alliances and blocs and events, and it's hard to keep track of who likes who, and who is pissed at whom because of what. You should get some recruitment messages. Check them out. Find an alliance that seems like it has active membership, and that has a vibe along the lines of what you're looking for. Lay low for a while, get involved with your alliance, learn how the things work, pay attention to what's happening with the politics. Then, when you have a better handle on things, you can always apply to a different alliance if you figure out there's one out there that better embodies what you're looking for.

A protest against alliances that can offer active membership, resources, allies, and sound advice on how to develop your nation?

Less than 10% of an alliance's nations staying in peace mode doesn't seem like the kind of egregious behavior that would warrant punitive terms. Farrin's offer was responsive to what your side claimed their concerns were about these nations (that they were a reservior of NS and tech), while preserving what we insisted was important to us about these nations (their ability to send cash aid).

*cough*bull shit*cough*

Hurray for peace. o/ Farrin and the NPO leadership o/ NPO's allies, and to our allies' allies, who stood by us o/ To the nations and alliances I fought - it was great fun. It's great that you're permanently positioned to demand reps when you're on the winning side, and to call it hypocrisy when and if you lose. But as the most butch, tough-talking proponent for reps in the entire war, maybe you should delegate the hypocrisy policing to someone else?