Jump to content

Garion

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,534

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Garion

  1. Garion
    Our coalition is about to crumble. Just wait a few minutes. No really, we're almost there.
  2. Garion
    You're so ignorant about last year's events it hurts. What coalition channel are you even talking about? Are you aware that TIO is not in the Usual Suspects bloc anymore, and isn't even allied to R&R anymore? I find it somehow hard to believe TIO has someone active enough to attend a coalition channel. Despite the mistake which undoubtedly falls under our responsibility you seem to quickly forget that communication goes both ways and RIA failed as badly as ourselves in that regard (I'm talking about ordinary comms here). I don't think you quite realize the irony in this statement of yours: "We are gonna fake a war target to have at NPO, but sure, feel free to jump on board and fight against one of your blocmates' oldest allies! Nevermind the fact that no detail of the war and coalition planning has been discussed with you guys, and that you were put aside as soon as TOP-Umbrella and related luggage were acquired! We still need good meatshields!"
  3. Garion
    How can this be white peace if there are terms imposed? No aid, no techdeals to the fighting parties... small as they might be, those are terms still. What we call white peace is not real white peace, hasn't been for years really.
  4. Garion
    After the lectures we got in your embassy on our boards, you shouldn't be surprised from our reactions, I think. Who burned those bridges first? Us or XX? But yes, let's conveniently forget all that because it doesn't suit your narrative.
  5. Garion
    Quite frankly, giving terms to Aftermath would achieve nothing that hasn't been achieved on the battlefield already. I don't desire to piss on their war effort, but most Aftermath members have taken a thorough beating during this war without landing back many blows (apart for a few noticeable exceptions of course). If you want a more pragmatic approach, the political cost for giving Aftermath terms would be much higher than the value of a few toptier nations (and before people spin my words, no: I don't support terms for anyone in this war, nor does R&R).
  6. Garion
    I understand going out of your way to support an ally, but to pretend NATO has any interest in keeping NpO at war is ridiculous. Feel free to paint NpO as a martyr all you wish, but you know very well they could get out of this war in no time, should they want to. What Lenny said is nothing shocking, despite what seems to be fake outrage particularly given the double standards in regard to this and last war: as long as NpO desires to stay in, they will face opposition from the alliances lined up against them. The world is shocked and appalled by such a stance! I'm tempted to waste my time and prove you wrong with a quote, but then I would have wasted my time for you. Cry me a river. You guys in NpO did such a perfect job with the management of last war (including the building up to it and post-war diplomacy) that it doesn't surprise me to see the reactions your membership and leadership is having after finding out you had pissed off so many people. You're welcome to keep ignoring all that happened in the past year and paint yourselves as victims, though. Someone will always buy such nonsense.
  7. Garion
    No shame in admitting defeat after an hard-fought war, and no need to drag this on for months to no avail. Congratulations on peace to all involved parties.
  8. Garion
    I think you're missing the dozens of posts where Dajobo states his desire for the war to go on for ages. I also think you didn't read Lenny's post at all.
  9. Garion
    Ehy dude, as long as you're happy burning alongside other TOP's allies while TOP watches the fireworks I'm be happy for you :P Makes our job easier, I'm sure you'll admit that at least. That's a nice zinger there, kudos. Still doesn't provide a real answer, probably because you can't state the real one. I'm sure most of your coalition is happy to burn for you at these conditions, though. Must be as smart of a plan as allowing Sparta to hit NPO last war. No !@#$: an alliance with one of the best upper tiers on Bob could have done more damage than a mid-tier alliance. Such cunning, Doch |:
  10. Garion
    This thread is bad and you should feel bad, berby. I understand where you're coming from, but if that's the line you're towing wouldn't have it been better to keep them out entirely? TOP's strenght is their upper tier and the core of experienced fighters, or so I assume given their "elite" label: having those nations drop down and fight in the midtiers would have probably put a major strain on our coalition's limited resources there, just by looking at the damage output NpO's former upper tier is dishing. I do not mean to tease and I don't have coalition-planning experience unlike yourself, but that just does not seem a successful strategy so far.
  11. Garion
    Let's be honest, downdeclares are one of the very few tactics which grant an advantage to the declaring nation: war is war, not a joust or a duel between knights in shining armor. Most people fight to make their alliance win, not for some self-serving "honor" to be found on the battlefield: the hands of those who brought you in the mud are seldom clear of machination and scheming, be them on the losing or winning side. I never understood the "fair fight" concept so many like to trumpet around during wartime.
  12. Garion
    The frothing crowd is diverse and not so obvious as it might seem, mine was not a jab at Polar.
  13. Garion
    From "You're useless cowards" to "Go GPA go!" to "You're a waste of space" in the span of two days, the frustration is strong around these boards.
  14. Garion
    You definitely didn't save your strenght for some murky future gain... EDIT: Engrish :P
  15. Garion
    I doubt anyone can contest your aggressive stance towards this war.
  16. Garion
    Admin forbid people have informed opinions on which they base their statements. Plenty of people who opposed MK wholeheartedly in MI6, let alone the fact that their gaming style doesn't remind me of MK at all.
  17. Garion
    The number of people salivating at the thought of those wars is too damn high.
  18. Garion
    Such generosity. I seem to recall a crowd bashing IRON for suspicious dealings not so long ago, I wonder where that crowd is right now. Looks like old news to me.
  19. Garion
    Had a good chuckle at this, obviously the TOP part of it.
  20. Garion
    IRON using politics to their advantage: the world is shocked.
  21. Garion
    NpO: self-imposing terms since 2014. Couldn't think of a worse way to use your aidslots, frankly: that's punitive enough. Anklebiter level is fun to be at, but strategically irrelevant unless you manage to gather ALL the anklebiters. Hint: you have not achieved that. This is hilarious. We are not in 2010 anymore: > 50k is uppertier? :| Self-sufficient without >50k NS nations? Problem: aiddrop by whom? If you refure to grow past 50k you won't be able to amass huge warchests, so that aid will be a bit harder to organize, long-term. Also, 50k is vague: how would you arrrange the necessary wonder growth by staying under that threshold? No WRCs? No EMPs? :| Oh yeah, explain how a third or so of your nations haven't declared a single war, then.
  22. Garion
    Probably not a good idea :(
  23. Garion
    Has this thread turned into a former NPLers e-peen contest? :| Shame on you.
  24. Garion
    And what will you do after round 1-2? :|
  25. Garion
    I have a feeling Fark is going to enjoy this immensely...
×
×
  • Create New...