Vulpes Inculta

[quote name='Timberland' timestamp='1323526453' post='2872536'] Its not "The classic i'm fighting rubbish" Its a fact, I'd put my money on the old GGA over NPL . [/quote] It might be a fact but that doesn't make it any less of a "trololo u guyz r crapola". Which is really all you've been saying thus far. Would you now? I wouldn't. Maybe someone should revive GGA just to test that.

[quote name='Timberland' timestamp='1323525755' post='2872522'] This guy collected in nuclear anarchy, yeah he's not hurting for money with is 212k wc http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=429967 [/quote] What can I say, every alliance has its noobs.

[quote name='Timberland' timestamp='1323525755' post='2872522'] You could barely handle nebula-x let alone handle DH, who are you kidding ? When all 3 of my opponents have a total of 10 million on them combined. You ready for bill lock yet ? [/quote] No seriously, all this laughing man...woo... Okay, ahem. Nah. We had Neb-X covered pretty well. If it hadn't been for your pre-empt, we would have grinded them down quite a bit more. Aha, the classic "the guyz im fightin' r rubbish!". Well, gee, we did just get hit by an entire bloc. Pre-empted, no less, not to mention we were already scrapping with Nebula-X.

[quote name='Timberland' timestamp='1323524794' post='2872511'] Your minister of economics doesn't seem to think you will stop recruiting our tech raids. [/quote] And of course, I had no idea GOONs took the [ooc]game[/ooc] this seriously: [quote]To: Vulpes Inculta From: John Gotti Date: 12/10/2011 7:43:55 AM Subject: RE: John... Message: Thats a nice attitude to have, I will be sure to let our gov know you don't plan on stopping recruiting our tech raids. You and your pathetic broke !@# alliance will continue to eat nukes for a very long time from me[/quote] [quote]To: Vulpes Inculta From: John Gotti Date: 12/10/2011 7:49:12 AM Subject: RE: John... Message: are you broke ? I have more than enough money to drop down to your level and continue to spy away it. Oh yeah i'm arrogant, when you have a billion on you like me, you can do whatever the !@#$ you want. eat it !@#$%[/quote] Thanks for making me chuckle, at least. As for this surrender. Meh. It's a bit like disregard Nebula-X, acquire Doom House. The only reason we shut down on this front was because we want to direct our full attention to Dumbhaus.

[quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1323198535' post='2865896'] It is illegal to force an alliance to give someone control (admin powers) over their alliance forums. However, viceroyship is legal as long as it stays in the purview of [OCC] the game [OCC]. That said, RoK have no intention of actually imposing a viceroy lol. [/quote] Ah, I see. Thanks for that clarification. There's your answer Rena.

[quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1323197999' post='2865882'] Are they illegal or is it just illegal in some of the powers a viceroy can take? I missed the time of viceroys so I have no idea about them. [/quote] From what I understand, viceroyship (that is, the forced control of another alliance by a chosen member of another alliance) was deemed illegal in 2008. I could be wrong, so I'd appreciate it if someone from back then could clarify.

[quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1323196977' post='2865870'] Non-chaining...yes we all know Rok does not have to defend Fark for the attacks it suffered yesterday, but Bob Ilyani was calling out ARES allies for not defending them. He wanted them to ignore non-chaining clauses just so that Rok could hit somebody. Now Rok, don't be cowards. Get you some and declare on GOD. You have sigs up for Bob Ilyani's Viceroyship...do something about it or be cowards. Or what, you're going to wait until CSN or RnR gets in so you can hit them instead? Hit GOD and let's see what happens after that, or are you afraid of GOD's jolly green giant? Also Wu, what did Rok know and when did you know it? Did you tell Fark about Nordreich's plans? Did you shrug and allow it? I hope the case is that they just didn't tell you, but from posts in this thread it seems you did know so I hope you at least told Fark. You wouldn't want to be compared to Grub now would you? [/quote] Can you read what I said please Jaiar? And then discontinue this argument please. Viceroys are also illegal, they aren't serious about that. Better not be, anyway.

Oh jeeze, the attention, it's killing me.

[quote name='NeCoHo' timestamp='1323138364' post='2864775'] I'd imagine the nature of the bloc itself (regardless of the bloc) means that it supersedes any stand-alone MDP or MDoAP, but that's just how things were the past 6 years more or less. [/quote] This, more or less. Depending on the circumstances, blocs > individual treaties. That's besides the matter though, we all knew RoK was never going to choose the MDoAP with Fark over MJ, especially not after that stunt they pulled attacking NPO. I love Fark to death but that was one move that disappointed even me. Jaiar I thought you knew how treaties worked man? [quote name='foxfire99' timestamp='1323186584' post='2865718'] If Rok hits GOD there won't be much of them left for NPL. [/quote] I laughed at this, well played sir.

Excellent, have fun out there.

War huh, what is it good for... Absolutely everything.

Oh c'mon, I thought you were DEAD ASS SERIOUS!!!! Yeah, I don't think this is gonna work bud.

[quote name='George Gordy' timestamp='1321423914' post='2845423'] DEAD ASS SERIOUS!!!! [/quote] Watch out guys, he's DEAD ASS SERIOUS!!!! FEAR, put him out of his misery.

[quote name='LordDarknessOfLight' timestamp='1321289332' post='2844622'] He did explain to me in a better sense, yes, I will agree with you on that.[/quote] Okeydokey. [quote]Now isnt someone trying to be a RV? Trust me, its quite ridiculous how you are trying soo hard on my points and you even stated, "they aren't worth approaching." if they aren't worth approaching, then why do you try and engage them? Words of advice: you dont have to comment on everyone posts, it makes you look more foolish. My comments go out to Kaskus, not to you. I already received my reply and i thank Tan. If i were to state to VI, then i would have done so, which in this case never happened.[/quote] Me trying to be RV? You really, [i]really[/i] have absolutely [i]got[/i] to be joking. Put me and RV in the same room and lock the door. Come back a day later, there wouldn't be anything left, not so much as a limb. I'm not trying "soo hard" on your points. I'll assume you haven't noticed the debate between myself and Sigrun. [i]That[/i] was me trying. You are merely dessert. They aren't worth approaching because you were basically saying nothing worth approaching. You said stuff like "I don't like war but if it must be done then so be it" and "Never assume anything because people who assume don't learn and blah blah blah..." which is all really quite ridiculous. You quoted and addressed me sunshine. I'm responding to you. [quote]Actually, Viridian Entente is a neutral alliance in political and warfare stances. Don't bring up my alliance in this case as you have no words to speak. FearUnited is correct. I have respect for my alliance as i do for everyone else. I would rather be here to start over with my new re-roll.[/quote] VE is not neutral when it comes to political and warfare stances. That is an intensely silly thing to say. VE, please educate this man. [quote]Here's another key word of advice for you VI: Think before you speak. You try too hard trying to call me a fool or making me look like a fool, its not going to win. I remember with FearUnited how i engaged RV and i never knew who he was at first.. Wrong move. I learned a lot from him. Now im tell you the same. Think before you speak, you'll be bitten in the end if you dont.[/quote] I do think before I speak. I think a lot. I think about how every word is structured and how it will affect whomever I am addressing. Sometimes I spend twenty minutes to half an hour thinking about my post, longer if it is an extended debate. (With the exception of the Vlad's thread, that was just balls to the wall tbbh.) You seem to be pretty obsessed with RV. Why are you bringing him into a conversation that has zilch to do with him? RV, what have you done to this man?