MadScotII
-
Posts
1,199 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by MadScotII
-
-
Does the "=" sign mean a different thing on Planet Bob. I know the leaders on here to a man do not know what Mutual and Coalition mean but didn't know they changed the meaning of "=" too
-
Valhalla merged to make AI then left to become Valhalla.
Valhalla = AI = Valhalla.
Good to know you see us as the true successor state of AI. and those that continue to fly the AI banner are fakes. I don't agree but hey, you might be right.
As for top tier crap, the whole top tier on Bob are a ****ing joke, not sure how you lot keep yourself entertained when nothing really happens with you. Be it Valhalla or not, just as bad as each other.
-
Valhalla fought as AI.
AI fought as AI in eQ.
-
Wait, Valhalla fought in eQ? Really?
-
You're half right: on your side, it only affected NPO. On Val's side, it threw a big middle finger to the other alliances at war with NPO.
It did happen. It ended only when other people began to notice what was going on. And I agree that it was a good thing for NPO. I do not fault NPO for entering this deal, as it was of benefit to NPO and had no ill effects for the rest of the coalition.
Why should any alliance do something like launch Nukes? It's bad enough I need to throw all the nukes against the guy I am fighting despite at least one of my partners being able to, and having more tech than me.
Sad, that you need our alliance to hold your hand by helping out to throw nukes in this dogpile though. Sad, sad indeed. (for the record glad it we're now full weapons open).
-
I stopped caring what 'other Alliances' thought during GATO-1V. The survivors of the Woodstock Massacre would probably agree. Again, just because the majority believes one thing, doesn't make it right. And evidently, without at least one Devil's Advocate, people start losing the plot.
If that was true then you would have removed yourself from world politics [ooc] this section of the forum[/ooc]. It is the same for everyone. Whoever is in charge of whatever alliance, if they post here, then they do care what people think of their alliance.
-
Ha ha people still call out people over the internet. :huh:
As for war on Neutrality.... I must have missed the DoW on GPA.
-
Interesting points and perspective. Only way to prove/disprove your hypothesis is if a strong group assembles to help give MQ a 21 gun salute sendoff from Bob, or wait until the end of the war on TDO and watch if/how many MQ 'ascend' from Bob and do not either form a diff AA, or join another established set of AA's etc.
Until either of the above come to pass its just conjecture and an invitation to a "NO U!" circular argument/thread.
CJ
TBH my money is on the latter. It's the only discussion/arguments the people on here know how to do. I'm actually sure people try and have a tournament on how many words they can produce just to say no u - while trying to look smart, but in the end looking like complete bell-ends.
-
Ha ha ha, do people still discuss or brag how good they are at clicking buttons. Wow.....
-
Impressive OP. Your teenage years will be fruitful!
-
Has it been this long?
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/114834-never-bring-an-umbrella-to-a-gun-fight/
I know, poor show from the "official" Valhalla government for leaving it so long after the war to treaty one of our foes. Must improve time keeping....
-
Wait there are actually people out there sad enough to do the stuff necessary to gather all this crap then do the work for others to see. Wow, just.... wow!
-
As soon the "Bad" votes surpass the "Good" votes, we will give to all alliances under 50 members and less than 2 years, 1 week to disband or merge before declare war against them.
You are warned! :war:signed,
Cyberverse.
How about any alliance that is over, lets say over two year old and has failed to reach 100 members is forced to disband, their leaders removed from ever becoming leaders again and the rest laughed at....
An alliance less than 2 years old with 49 members is just as much (if not more) as a success (especially if they started from scratch) than one that has less than 100 members at the age of 5+....
-
So IRON cancel on NPO and then some of the "greatest minds" of Planet Bob decide to have a "no u" competition. Congrats people, truly congrats.
-
That is true, though, I'm sure the true nature of the treaty is understood between both parties. A disclaimer to clarify would be nice. Nevertheless,
Congratz you two.Why? Only those involved require to know the meaning of said treaty.
-
I can't believe I'm treatied to Chairman Hal, I feel a little dirty inside.
:)
o/ Valhalla
o/ NG
o/ Ferrets
Trying being in the same alliance as him :(
-
2) More tiny alliances means more entangling alliances. There are too many treaties, period. You cannot have a war without it becoming global. You cannot hit one alliance without drawing in 20 by Day 2 of the war. It takes forever for a war to start, for a war to be fought, and for a war to wind down. And then it takes a long, long, long time before the next war. When coalitions have 50+ alliances, it is impossible for things to happen with any reasonable, fun speed.
Then the buigger alliances need to stop signing treaties with those on "both sides".
-
I'm going with "coz they miss their valhalla days"
This. Sorry there is no real juicy gossip to why some of us returned to the cold dark halls of Valhalla
-
Anarchy Inc. was fun, but Valhalla is home.
o/
-
It removes active members from the larger alliances that are in desperate need of them to be able to properly contribute, or even just maintain a stable population. As such, I see small alliances as a bad thing for cybernations.
Maybe those alliances that want to be big have to realise they're not really big, and well starting cutting those inactives away?
People in this thread bemoaning smaller alliances are just as bad for this game, than new people wanting to do stuff themselves, their way. Trying to make people join established alliances is a real cock and bull thing to do.
-
Sorry but no one is intimidated by TENE.
Yeah because TENE don't have any allies do they?
-
Then I guess NG just attacked its MDoAP partners :DScariest thing is no one actually knows that a Coalition is a treaty of a MDAP scale. Because it has never been used like that before doesn't change this fact.
Anyone who doubts this or questions this doesn't know the meaning of a Coalition.
-
SNAFU :wub: even that Stetson fellow!
-
This is the third counter DoW I have read. Did anyone on the other side actually read the original DoW posted by Tronix? Just asking.
NG-Val
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
So, is that a yes or a no. Those are the easy kind of questions. But hey you do the hardman thing and turn to name calling. Well done, from me to you, with much love xxx