Chief Black Hawk

Wow, that banner is really awesome. This seems like it works out for both alliances. Good luck to both parties.

[quote name='Mr Damsky' timestamp='1310062334' post='2751499'] I did not realize that pointing out the obvious hypocrisy in this thread when alliances are telling Legion that they don't have the guts to attack NSO and then when the exact same thing happens to them they do absolutely nothing except piss and moan that you're posting "rubbish". What a Brave New World we live in that pointing out hypocrisy is rubbish but imitation of an alliance designed to bait them into saying something stupid is seen as the epitome of high brow humor. [/quote] You're making this Brave New World a better place. One peanut sized testicle joke at a time.

Why don't you just switch up CCC to JCC, Jewish Coalition of Countries. Japanese and Jewish both start with J's. Judaism and Christianity are pretty much the same thing...

[quote name='Joey67500' timestamp='1309981891' post='2750584'] While I don't approve of someone reforming TGE. And at the very least, it should have been planned better or perhaps using a different name, I do wish to point out that just because of past wrong doings doesn't mean you have to attack them. When GOONS came back, they made it clear they weren't the same. And they aren't. I can respect them for improving 'their' reputation and for the same reason, I don't see a problem with this. This fellow took an alliance he liked, and is trying to give it back meaning, I can't fault him for that. I do agree, he should have gotten a protector, he should have probably re-thought the name choice [b]or spoken with NoR[/b] but if he is trying to start anew and isn't recreating the alliance that everyone hated, I can't see any issue. The very least we can do is let him exist, if he fails, he fails. If he succeeds, he succeeds. And if it turns into the old TGE, we kill it... with fire. Edit: clarification. [/quote] I agree with this post besides the bold print. You don't need another alliances permission to start your own alliance.

It would be really cool if all these zombie alliances just merged into one zombie alliance with a zombie theme.

[quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1309837069' post='2749072'] Do you believe in valid or invalid CBs? If you do then there is where you're not understanding what a CB is. There are no such things as vaild or invalid CBs. In this case of Legion accusing Varianz. That is the act or the CB that NSO could use if it wanted to go to war. It cannot be argued to be valid or invalid. You have a CB. You won't use it though will you. [/quote] Look at the Pacifican saying CB's don't need to be valid [EDIT]or invalid[/EDIT]. [quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1309836905' post='2749070'] Oh look an attempt at being clever against a person's AA. Mighty original.[/quote]

[quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1309836905' post='2749070'] Oh look an attempt at being clever against a person's AA. Mighty original. [/quote] I try my best to impress. Please ignore me and carry on with your very original thought provoking CB validation/tech raiding discussion.

Maybe it would be wise if members of VE stayed out of any discussions about spy operations and their potential for escalation.

[quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1309829247' post='2748932'] Well if it means that much to you that he made a grammatical error, then by all means go for it. Im gonna withdraw from this conversation now, it went from arguing about spying to arguing about who completed English 101. [/quote] He didn't make one grammatical error. His post was a train wreck. Like I said, he took the first pot shot at our ability to read. I'm only following the direction you guys are leading the argument. Sorry I interrupted the great debate going on here. Here, I believe he left off at, "Learn to read. I'm stupid? NO U comments are stupid. U are stupid for using them." Please continue...

[quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1309828404' post='2748918'] This is not English Class. Your response to his argument is that he has grammatical errors... In your own words "Do something about it." [/quote] I'm not one for pointing out grammatical errors. However, if someone's going to base an argument on the fact that we can't read, I am certainly well within my right to ask him to make himself more clear by presenting his "argument" properly. He took a shot at us about reading comprehension first. I don't feel bad about making fun of the fact that he can't write in English.

[quote name='nutkase' timestamp='1309826753' post='2748894'] I believe that the situation is funny, not I. [b]Learn to read and process correctly.[/b] Telling me to shut up, [b]weird coming out of a member from [s]a[/s] AN alliance[/b] advocating freedom of speech within this very thread. I among a lot of other people dislike certain alliances and/or people, [b]yet you[/b] don't see the same amount of dedication that NSO is currently displaying. Also for the future, learn to rebuttal rather [s]then[/s]THAN a NO U comment. [/quote] First of all, go ahead and master using proper grammar before telling people to learn how to read and process information. Also, telling someone to learn not to use "NO U" comments in a post that utilizes multiple "NO U" comments is a bit detrimental to the point you were attempting make. [quote]Telling me to shut up is trying to pressure someone into censoring what they say, therefor basic denial of freedom of speech.[/quote] Telling someone to shut up is using freedom of speech to tell someone to shut up. It's like a paradox. It's not worth arguing.

[quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1309823631' post='2748856'] U mad? Then avoid each other. [/quote] Yeah, avoiding alliances you dislike. That's worked out for NPO in the past.