Unknown Smurf
-
Posts
3,022 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Unknown Smurf
-
-
On 6/25/2016 at 10:56 PM, Rayvon said:
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result ...... Every single time you do this TIR gets attacked ... Have you not figured out yet? When you take your alliance, the one that was not hit, then you are acting in aggression not defense ... Doesn't matter if your protector got hit, their actions then become defensive. You, not being them, are acting in aggression to go in defense of them.
YOU are leading Defense gov; Ace is second-in-command of TIR -- your gov status makes your movements a TIR-condoned action, and just like nearly every other ghosting alliance you get hit.
TBF, Sengoku and others protectorates have done the same thing as TIR yet are held to different standards.
-
7 minutes ago, Auctor said:
Of course you haven't been allowed to surrender. You claim to be a government member and as such are being held responsible with the others.
I've said I'm open to speaking to Murtibing or sgt gus as well, just not to you because you're a dishonest person and I have no idea what you're empowered to do and I don't really care to negotiate with you regardless. The other alliances governments have *always* been allowed to contact me if they wish to obtain peace and so far, only TIR has done so. They balked at surrender and no reentry, so yeah, there really hasn't been a lot of interest in playing games with it. If any of the other alliances think the starting point is going to be something different, they're delusional.
I've never spoken once to Emperor Mic, so that's news to me.
1) Please learn to read. I said Mic and dozens of others in NEW/SP&TR/Kaskus have approached you ingame or otherwise (IRC) about individual surrenders, this has nothing to do with me.
2) Where did I ever claim to be a government member? At the start of the war I was in TBC.
3) You demand to speak to those that have no experience with CN negotiations for individual surrenders? Why would governments of certain alliances be involved in individual surrenders regardless? It is clear that you are demanding to speak to inactives/others who have decided to quit in order to hold others who want to keep playing CN at perma-war.
-
3 hours ago, Auctor said:
At no point have any of these nations approached me for an individual surrender. They've either sent intermediaries, which I don't accept, or simply left the AA and declared themselves free of it, which is unacceptable as well. Given the very real concern about the lack of autonomy of some of these nations, some level of proof that the people we're letting go aren't the people we are still fighting is reasonable. To date, none of them has bothered to provide it or even seek peace for themselves.
So either $%&@ off or do something about it.
Pure !@#$%^&*.
Sengoku, Oculus and Auctor specifically have denied dozens of nations that have approached him and others. I have logs. They have been blown off with statements such as "peace comes from within," "not my problem," "I understand where you are coming from but it's not my decision and I don't know whose decision it is," and so on and so forth.
This war has been going on for almost 4 monthes now. Other wars have started and ended, but Oculus, Sengoku and Auctor have basically sentenced our entire sphere to PZI.
Auctor has stated that he will only deal with Bones* -- including on issues such as individual surrenders for NEW, Kaskus and SP&TR nations who have never interacted with Bones.
* = Not to mention Bones has been MIA except in game for months.
EDIT:
When Mic approached Oculus government they said "Who are you?" when he asked for peace. When he linked his nation to them (IRC) he was ignored on 3 separate occasions. On the fourth occasion he was told that Bones, Vibi and a few others were saying that they were going to quit the game after they ran out of WCs so Auctor and others in Oculus have sentenced the other 89 nations on NEW/SP&TR/Kaskus AA to PZI, for crimes commited by a nation on the Mongols AA.
-
This is relevant to the state of the world today.
NSOs allies were deadweight. Any potential coalition to Oculus would be made up of deadweight. All those Oculus is only x% NS of the world are bull.
-
5 hours ago, The Warrior said:
It sounds to me like it is the Mongols that intend to keep Addaff at war for the next 6 months or more then.
Why is those handful of DK going rogue related to Mongols war? Honest question.
-
2 minutes ago, berbers said:
Good stuff, great to see you guys sticking up for yourself and fighting back after being raided.
Oh wait crap, the people that attacked you get off scot free while you join a bandwagon against someone who already has 11 alliances on then.
At least your priorities are in order.
They have 3 people in range.. barely. 2 who were hit a week ago by Cuba and 1 in peace mode.
-
8 hours ago, Mogar said:
As someone who frequently works alone, it is fairly easy to work out individual surrenders that can be agreeable with some negotiation, I am curious to know how much personal negotiation you had partaken in before the terms were agreed to.
At the time of this post: individual surrenders are not allowed by Oculus.
Even for those just honoring treaties.
-
10 hours ago, white majik said:
The fact remains that no alliance outside Oc and DBDC has done anything in years to move/shape the game in ANY direction. It's been one global war a year and then nothing till the next. Don't be mad that no one in the game is willing to a make moves besides us, be mad at the people that still aren't making moves and just complaining.
I'm personally offended.
-
5 hours ago, Auctor said:
Let's play this out. Someone hits Valhalla, activates IRON, VE, Umbrella. Is it really fear of NG, NPO, AZTEC that kept them from doing it?
The inability to roll Val with NG backing is what keeps them from doing it. If you're gonna go for Val with those 3 defending you need others in your corner
-
14 hours ago, Rebel Virginia said:
NSO was dealing more damage to Legion than it received, and at the time Legion was twice NSO's size at the start of the war and was being aided en masse by NpO. Had MK and VE not intervened, NSO would have been able to secure a victory.
You think you know your history, but then again you would not be questioning my relevance if you did.
-
20 hours ago, Alexio15 said:
Im old fashioned and like to do it close
Or dumb and don't understand the 25 hour rule.
-
I had 48 thwarted against me in a 24 hour period (But 1 nuke hit in the middle, around nuke 26) -- 25 by the same person in a row.
-
I believe you can donate as much as you want; you'll just get the $30 bonus though.
-
You know we never really saw eye to eye, but this declaration proves that VEs conflicting treaty argument is just an excuse for their cowardice and for that I applaud you.
Edit: VE not Umb**
-
I mean drunkenly isn't the best.
But I hear you DN.
They attacked a protectorate of an alliance that was just honoring a treaty and then turned around and kept them at war for 3+ monthes without any attempt of diplo. Pretty $%&@ed.
I wish you didn't get involved, but if we're going out swinging, I appreciate you with me.
-
I was in CON.
Vladimir Stukov, gold trium still plays also.
-
Just now, Chunky Monkey said:
Because hitting Pacifica went so well for the last.... I lost count of how many coalitions tried that, but you're welcome to look at history and see how it turned out
Pacifica and IRON are the heaviest hitters in your/Spartas tier. Hitting them and forcing anarchies/not letting them cherry pick targets would've been ideal from an OOC perspective.
-
Pacifica must be so happy.
Not only do they win the world, they don't even have to take the brunt of damage.
-
I appreciate LHs posts. It's much better than nothing.
-
Looks to me like VE is just trying to pretend to care about Spartas predicament without committing anything.
Sparta/Dave is delusional if they think IRON would ever help them by hitting NpO considering the current state of affairs.
-
12 hours ago, Learz said:
Ok so, NPO attacks us, but they won't tell us why. I can accept that. But the thing that miffs me is, why didn't they roll Legion? I think this deserves an answer first.
Because the Legion is allied to NpO and real wars don't cure Frawleys boredom.
Replace DK with The Legion.
-
7 hours ago, hartfw said:
The idea of Umbrella and Iron defending an ally isn't really related to Oculus at all. They had those ties beforehand and would have defended beforehand.
Similarly, the idea of someone debating hitting an aa for lols without even a cb only to chicken out because they don't want to be hit by the aa's treaty partners isn't a new concept.
What you and Auctor are glossing over is Oculus' supremacy clause.
Without Oculus, a war could have been arranged on Valhalla even with Umb/IRON defending them. Yes it would've taken a bit of diplomatic effort, but I'm sure getting a coalition together wouldn't have been impossible. But when you take into account that all of Oculus would be entering on Val's defense as first line of defense that really defeats any coalition before it gets off the ground.
-
4 hours ago, Auctor said:
SUN wasn't declared on. This whole "Invicta's totally innocent because some of their allies weren't informed and possibly not involved" line of reasoning is neither here nor there.
What is here and there is the fact that you have yet to post any sort of proof whatsoever.
-
Pretty sure it's 10 days.
- Nations may not exit war mode for 10 days after exiting inactivity mode.
9 < 10
Let's Play With Scorpions!
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
1) No it's not.
2) "Unknown Smurf - Resident Kanye West" is clearly a joke about how much I post/how loud I am. Especially when you consider all the other signatures contain official titles (Ex: Executive Officer, Security Council Member)
3) Yeah.. like the messages they sent you multiple times asking about individual terms and being repeatedly ignored? If you want to actually post proof of ANYWHERE you ever acknowledged individual surrenders were on the table or you ever considered them, that would be a great first step.
But, as always you continue to brush off statements and spout bull under the implication of fact without any proof posted.