Ozymandius

Come get rocked by this thunder STA

o/ GOD

Go AR! GOD o/

o/ NPL

o/ GOD o/ CRAP o/[s] Communism [/s] 'IMerica

For SF o/

You know Sardonic CSN is a little bigger than 40 people.

To our awesome new member. o/ SF

lol Anathema, really? What have they ever done besides getting shut down for trying to make a new Vox?

[quote name='Aloop' timestamp='1323579236' post='2873217'] Heck with that, I'm obviously the best choice for Dark Lord. I do the tall, dark, and menacing look better than anyone else in GOD. Plus, I love annoying people, so you'd have no trouble convincing other alliances to use us as a punching bag for the next 2 years or so. [/quote] Ha. I do the tall, [b]dark[/b], and menacing better than you.

[quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1323556114' post='2872910'] We've rolled people for less. [/quote] But you'll have to wait two years first.

o/ NPL o/ GOD o/ Ozy

[quote name='Diabloz' timestamp='1312386989' post='2770963'] Oh look at me , i am methrage no one gives a damn about me.. i need attention! [/quote] This. Really Methrage quit with trying to ride everyone else's drama coattails.

[quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1309899853' post='2749654'] Oh c'mon. Granted, I know leadership is time-consuming and difficult, and I was never in MA.. but give me a break. Whenever KaitlinK left MA had something around 230 members and was well into the SR. Granted, KaitlinK must've brought with her a large cadre of active members, but it was only something like 15 (I would have to look at the ASR to get more accurate numbers here). Inheriting an alliance of 200+ people is not at all a bad gig to be put into. Why you couldn't manage to recruit to replenish your numbers or grow your alliance through a copious amount of tech deals, I think, is reflective of how a government manages to lead an alliance. Don't have a full-time recruiter? Do it yourself until you can find one. Inactive? Try bringing your existing and new members onto IRC as much and effectively as possible. Be innovative and exciting. etc. After a certain point, you gotta only blame yourself, as you let MA decay to a 1/3 of its size before you threw in the towel. KaitlinK didn't do that. [/quote] Though when suddenly most of the infrastructure of your gov up and leaves it tends to be a cluster $%&@. People who are experienced and know what they are doing don't just pop-up. You need people who can show them what to do and how to do it. Though when those people leave it makes it hard to do anything.

[quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1309899853' post='2749654'] Oh c'mon. Granted, I know leadership is time-consuming and difficult, and I was never in MA.. but give me a break. Whenever KaitlinK left MA had something around 230 members and was well into the SR. Granted, KaitlinK must've brought with her a large cadre of active members, but it was only something like 15 (I would have to look at the ASR to get more accurate numbers here). Inheriting an alliance of 200+ people is not at all a bad gig to be put into. Why you couldn't manage to recruit to replenish your numbers or grow your alliance through a copious amount of tech deals, I think, is reflective of how a government manages to lead an alliance. Don't have a full-time recruiter? Do it yourself until you can find one. Inactive? Try bringing your existing and new members onto IRC as much and effectively as possible. Be innovative and exciting. etc. After a certain point, you gotta only blame yourself, as you let MA decay to a 1/3 of its size before you threw in the towel. KaitlinK didn't do that. [/quote] Though when suddenly most of the infrastructure of your gov up and leaves it tends to be a cluster $%&@. People who are experienced and know what they are doing don't just pop-up. You need people who can show them what to do and how to do it. Though when those people leave it makes it hard to do anything.