Given the first two sentences id say the second clause of the last sentence depends on the first. Or put another way, can anyone demonstrate to me how the reescalation isn't III% sided alone?
Small alliances are risky. Big you know who has a target. you also want mass (as opposed to eleat) if your asking Leaving out NpO and Mi6 as targeted you shuld look at NPO, Iron, GPA (if you don't like war), VE, or ODN.
I had an Idea:
What if you used the sum of the starting strength of all alliances in a coalition (on the day it is a stranthlost page) as a starting strength and used that as the starting strength of the coalition.
In the end, it doesn't matter what the intentions were: the fact so many of the rank and file came to that conclusion means the trust nessery for MDP has failed but I wold have liked to see a downgrade not cancellation.