OverlordShinnra

Also would be nice if you attacked whoever the spying alliance is :)

I believe TTK will use their best judgement on what PZI really means. Forcing players to delete is not healthy and is a worst offense in many regards then spying.

moar

Congrats.

I love it.

Meh, any alliances are aloud to have any ties they want and it should be valid. But I do agree that people need some ambition. There are few alliances that drive politics. It would be great if there were more. I'm not claiming one bloc has a monopoly on moving politics or making the game interesting. But I am claiming that these politics moving alliances are few and far between and a lot has to do with the apathy and lack of ambition alliance leaders have.

The first wars were going for the full week since 5/6. Don't see the point.

See either all of those alliances were winning at the time they were number 1 OR there is no purpose to this game. I believe the former because being in a dominating position is as close as you will get to winning in this game.

Respectable imo

What was 3 days?

Then what is the purpose of this game?

Take it as serious was the correct answer.

If people think my definition of winning is off or doesn't mesh with yours. I invite you to give me another one.

I have heard this thought that alliances that don't do anything and aren't out for world domination should be left alone. I couldn't disagree with this philosophy more. It is a very simple argument to make -- Cybernations is a game Games have winners To win in Cybernations you want to be in a dominant position (Be in a High ranking) Currently Neutrals and Neutral-Lite alliances have a pretty firm grip on the higher rankings whether it be alliance-wide (GPA, WTF) or Nation Wide (Hime Themis) There is a pretty significant block of NS that has a political philosophy that doesn't mesh well with rolling the above alliances (SF/XX/Polarsphere) Therefore the next predicted war is just a precursor to the above plan

confirmed and reciprocated.

This is certainly interesting.

You've had twice as much time to buy stuff as I have so I would expect you be there. :p o/ Lady Shinnra

If you really want to get in an epeen contest (Which we aren't interested in). I have more casualties then the top 3 Misfits combined. /discussion

you must be a newb.

o/

I don't think we need to argue about it any longer. It's not really on the top of my "to do list" to get rid of your treaty, I'm just letting you know that it's stupid. As some fun though, I can see that you guys are indeed prepared.

The "And you will" portion didn't refer to myself really (though it could have been). It referred to the fact that a lot of alliances in TE are determined to keep this game as TE and not SE. For that reason these alliances prefer fair fights, no treaties, war fought often and attacking whoever is number 1 (in nation rankings, not so much alliance rankings). So it was a threat in a sense but not from me directly so much as this notion is going to nip you in the butt sooner or later.

We respect your decision but we do not acknowledge your summary of our summary of your war to be accurate. We think treaties are dumb We think down-declares make the game less fun No where in there do we say activating a treaty is dumb. Just dumb to have it in the first place. (Clarification)

lookin good sexies

It's mostly RIOT who deserves to be bashed here. They are the ones who asked for the down declare. NLoN probably can't find their way in a war let alone their way to the OWF but I'll butt out anyway seeing as my job here is done. Anyone who is anyone is aware of this.