Vanilla Napalm

[quote name='Enamel32' timestamp='1341960761' post='3008076'] How is [i]you[/i] encouraging a war, where we ended up at odds [i]our[/i] choice? Your post gives the illusion that you believe we are going to disregard all our treaty partners to bandwagon the winning side. Clearly you convinced Umb that was ok, but that doesn't fly in our book. [/quote] Oh man, i am eagerly awaiting an NPO members response after reading this.

You'll be back. They always come back.

[quote name='Stonewall Jaxon' timestamp='1341292930' post='3002327'] See what I mean, Archon? TIme to do this sad song and dance VN, you're insulted I named Neo Uruk the worst poster on your side instead of you, aren't you? That's cute. I'm sorry I overlooked you, a snubbing of that sort won't happen again. [/quote] Oh man, LOVING THE MONIKER! Tight. Don't worry, i'm sure someone will come in and discuss your 'MK killed thought in CN' line of reasoning. It will be glorious, i'm sure.

[quote name='Stonewall Jaxon' timestamp='1341291979' post='3002305'] That's a failure of your tenure as top dogs, Archon. When NPO's side sent out posters, they conducted themselves with a sense of self-respect, and long-winded discussions were as meaningful as they were enjoyable. I had a blast being a provocative Vox/FAN poster and arguing everything from CBs to Continuum/Initiative dealings of old. With your lulz brigade, all the opposition gets back from our posts (typically) is a ludicrous one-liner, which when challenged is met with "I guess my sarcasm just went over your head." Have you seen some of the people posting on behalf of DoomHouse (see: Neo Uruk)? I fully agree with you that discussions here have devolved into practically nothing, but I maintain that your way of doing things has been the root cause of it, so I have no idea why you look down your nose at me. Your posting here has been probably the only time I've been seriously engaged by an MK member, and though you've been very petty in your arguments, resorting to lazily crafted insults, I've at least appreciated the change of pace from your alliance's normal MO. Hell, as a CoJ member I encouraged OsRavan to post more because I at least enjoy the sport of discussion. However, at the end of the day all you do is break off, and instead of respectably retiring from the conversation, you can't help yourself from making an empty, unjustifiable condescending remark. I can see where your subjects get their thickness from. [/quote] Well, There we have it. Not only have MK redefined the game 08-onwards, they have effectively redefined the human capacity to communicate. People used to say "NPO won the game", but god damn if they were just a drop in the pond compared to the current eternal hegemony. Congrats MK, you are not only worse than NPO but you are literally Hitler.

[quote name='Courland' timestamp='1334656628' post='2954779'] Unknown Smurf fought bravely and with honor in a war he volunteered for. If half the people who post did one quarter as much as he has, GOONS would have ceased to exist sometime in March. [/quote] Especially if three-quarters of GOONS had three-forths of a fifth before the designated half did their quarter. Might just be me though.

[quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1334648761' post='2954747'] There was extenuating circumstances regarding my surrender. [/quote] Gotta love the Sparta defense. Warchest start getting too low, champ?

[quote name='Courland' timestamp='1334397649' post='2953058'] I take it back. Both GOONS leaders AND membership is crap. [/quote] Wait, what now? Is this another mistaking me for GOONS govt. thing? I hope so.

[quote name='Courland' timestamp='1334396508' post='2953049'] Actually, I have utmost respect for their leaders. It's their membership that is crap. [/quote] Well that's just mean. After i broke one of your nations 3 million casualty cherry too. We were happy. Now, i just don't know anymore.

You know, i am certain that many of the posters in here condemning NPO have more than once rolled out the 'treaties should be political, not just BFF' line. Food for thought.

[quote name='the rebel' timestamp='1333896293' post='2949979'] You can if they're reasonable to the other side [/quote] Is it really 'force' if there is no resistance? [quote] and/or you have the military might to force it.[/quote] Oh lawdy, you'll be telling me you can force alliances to disband next.

[quote name='the rebel' timestamp='1333886258' post='2949935'] Last I heard they were 500 million combined *shrugs*. So obviously my previous point still stands on GOONS having difficulty enforcing any reps over what kaskus/mongols are willing to pay, otherwise this conflict would be over no? [/quote] OMG YOU CANT FORCE AN ALLIANCE TO ACCEPT TERMS. I feel dirty making that arguement, but you always try anything once i guess.

Oh god. After reading your little hissy-fit at Timberland, i really didn't think this little absurdity could get much better. But yeah, you just went and did this. I love it.

[quote name='Canik' timestamp='1333611421' post='2948567'] I think as far as GOONS is concerned MONGOLS attacked by aiding that nation. I would be interested to see proof as to whether not the aid was purposefully. If it was, then GOONS's argument has merit. If not, then GOONS were going out of their way to be the aggressors. It may have already been posted somewhere and I may have missed it but all I've seen is claims that it was purposeful by a GOON or two. [/quote] Despite the fact that i really dislike the whole 'aggressive defender/passive initiator or visa versa' crap, it really should be pointed out that the sent deals included aid of money, tech and soldiers. Hardly the innocuous tech deal.

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1333447742' post='2947764'] /b/ecause they will make it unusable [/quote]Silly Alterego, you're as clueless on our affairs as you are on our culture.

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1333202582' post='2946124'] Its unavoidable, but judging by their actions over the last few years they want to be obliterated rather than just defeated when it comes. Its the only explanation for the actions of their aggressive hegemony. [/quote] Aww, and i was rather looking forward to the changing ends after the third quarter. Score an orange slice and watch the 'here's new boss, same as the old boss same as the older boss' routine.

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1333184757' post='2946048'] Quotes lke this, others like it, the pip showing DH as 3 divisions of the same group and interchangable membership will make a defeat of each of you a defeat of all three. When all three allances are defeated they will end up paying 9 times the reps. GOONs defeat - GOONs, MK & Umbrella all pay reps. MK defeat - MK, GOONs & Umbrella all pay reps Umbrella defeat - Umbrella, MK & GOONs all pay reps. It could break the $50 billion mark in combined reps of money and tech. [/quote] Nah, we'd probably end up getting peace after two weeks and then spend the next few years whining like !@#$%*es about the new hegemony.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1332998176' post='2944814'] So you're using your own alliance incompetence to build a upper/mid tie as an excuse to need help while your comrades trash talk other alliances, bravo. [img]http://oi47.tinypic.com/1e5p3o.jpg[/img] [spoiler](excuses for no having a upper/mid tie coming in 5, 4, 3...)[/spoiler] [/quote] Your 'arguement' here. It's interesting. "You don't have an upper tier because you suck... inb4 any other reasons for not having an upper tier." We do have an upper tier. They're just [i]too[/i] big. Our talent for building superior upper tiers is something of a curse, so we had to use Umbrella's mediocre upper-tier to fill the gap. Extreme competence does have its draw backs.

[quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1332994915' post='2944777'] I think your stretching this by comparing it to you guys needing help with war tourists rather than needing help fighting two micro alliances. If you really think these are NEW tourists, then maybe you guys should be declaring on NEW. [/quote] Considering the lengths by which you have pointed out the MK tourists on our AA i find this train of thought surprising. Consistency and all that, embrace the buzzword. As far as fighting NEW goes, i'm in two minds about something like that. On one hand i'm quite fond of NEW, which does mean that i wouldn't be turning around and fighting them. On the other hand i do enjoy their mellow approach to war, and it would create an avenue for me to engage in my atrocious pigeon Indonesian. I don't really know how to feel about that.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1332992590' post='2944756'] Let me open your eyes then: because is ironic and hypocritical the fact that you are mocking the war performance of one alliance in the same thread that one of your allies announce that you will help your alliance to fight two micro alliances. [/quote] Let me open your eyes; This is nothing other than a declaration upon war tourists. Looking over the results of this declaration, I'd consider it a bit of a stretch to interpret a NEW tourist being hit after hitting 1 MK tourist and 1 Umbrella tourist as 'helping your alliance to fight two micro alliances'. The Kaskus/Mongols vs. GOONS is pretty incidental at this point.

[quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1332849693' post='2943696'] Another DH? How original, maybe you guys can fight it out over who gets the acronym with all caps. [/quote] Don't worry, we're sending a few guys over. Eventually they'll reach high government and will cancel the treaty, leaving VE/Deinos open to getting their just retribution. It is only a matter of time that they will feel the wrath of karma.

[quote name='Phineas' timestamp='1332566437' post='2942518'] Okay, if I throw napalm on your alliance, this makes me just as bad as your throwing napalm on whoever you want to? Am I getting closer? [/quote] But... that's further away. You just added a needless analogy...

[quote name='Phineas' timestamp='1332566103' post='2942513'] Calling someone bad now makes me bad? This changes everything! [/quote] Oh dear. I think you skipped a stop on that train of thought.

[quote name='Kzoppistan' timestamp='1332225886' post='2940573'] ... I'm generally reluctant to show myself on video or the airwaves, because, one (1) I'm hideous and two (2), I sound funny. That should be enough to convince a normal person to avoid those mediums. But I am not normal, and have no such desires of self-preservation. [/quote] But you've been working to change that, right? The 50 pushups each morning, 50 pullups. No pills, no more bad food, no more destroyers of your body. Sure, you don't believe that one should devote their life to morbid self-attention, but surely becoming a person like other people is what counts right?

[quote name='KenoCore' timestamp='1332078314' post='2939659'] ^ that kind of war does sounds pretty yummy :3 and very true though i personally hardly consider this GOONS anywhere near like old GOONS (which ironically contradicts my original statement) this GOONS is like the ugly retarded incest filled cousin of the old GOONS. at least the old one was Classy and trashy about being bullies . OOC: I miss Shark week :l [/quote] We'll remember to charge 40k next time, i guess. EDIT: You know, I kinda missed the Methrage approach to political interpretation. The dark unpleasant splotch of words you tend to leave around make our more reasoned opponents seem almost positive.

[quote name='NoMercy' timestamp='1332075797' post='2939645'] "We charge reps to anyone who attacks us aggressively" is just dump if not meant in the technical sense. (meaning to actually post the first DoW, and hit you). If you don't see it in the actual sense, you can extort this definition to every war and every CB that ever existed on this planet. If you are really serious with it, you also must admit that NPO was aggressively attacked by GPA etc. etc. So please use the "we are the bad guys, and bad guys are cool; and yes we can, so please stop us" argument to save us all some time. [/quote] That has to be the saddest argument I've ever seen. I really do hope you made it in jest, because this attempt to extrapolate our 'we get attacked, we charge reps' to some spurious potential interpretation of anything is ridiculous.