Jump to content

TOLWYN

Banned
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    218

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by TOLWYN

  11. THE DARK LORDS SURRENDER

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Believland' date='06 July 2010 - 12:39 PM' timestamp='1278441524' post='2361291']
    Is there anyway we can contact you?
    [/quote]

    all i want is peace from draco. and to the facepunch alliance guy who i anarchied sorry but thats what happens in war. i kno i did a lot of damage and nothing really good came from it. now im wondering if war is even worth it in the first place cus everything just got destroyed and i lost a lot of money.

  12. the gremlins

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by TOLWYN

    [quote name='Pomiel' date='06 July 2010 - 11:23 AM' timestamp='1278437000' post='2361222']
    lmao

    no, you definitely shouldn't read that thread. you'll probably get bored halfway through page 2


    Basically, NpO didn't like \m/ so they started a war. Then as that war came to a close, The Order of the Paradox (TOP) declared war on the Complaints and Grievances Union ([url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Complaints_and_Grievances_Union"]wiki[/url]) because they thought CnG were planning to harm them or some crap ([url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=79441"]DoW[/url]) . Shortly afterwards, several of TOP's allies, including IRON, DAWN, TORN, and others also declared on CnG for similar reasons ([url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/TOP-C%26G_War"]wiki[/url]) . The Gramlins under Ramirus Maximus recently adopted a "paper-less" policy in which they don't sign treaties, and support people they consider to be their friends. Despite this, they still maintain (?) a treaty with Mostly Harmless Alliance, the Harmlin Accords, which basically states that Gramlins and MHA are the same alliance ([url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/The_H%C3%A4rmlins"]wiki[/url]). Thus, the Harmlins declared IRON ([url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=79461"]DoW[/url]).

    Eventually, most forces on the side of Complaints and Grievances Union agreed to cease hostilities with the TOP side in the Easter Sunday Accords ([url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=83752"]forums[/url]). Ramirus Maximus, and the Gramlins, however did not agree to this, despite their brothers in MHA's name appearing on the document. This is where things get really controversial: Ramirus wanted IRON et al to agree to unconditional surrender, which would basically allow Gramlins to dictate whatever they wanted as terms after the surrender. Ramirus maintains that this was only to force IRON to concede that it was wrong to begin the war. Many were vehemently opposed to this as they believed Gramlins could abuse this power. Thus, the Gramlins continue their fight against IRON alone, to this day.

    Ramirus claims that this course of action is better suited towards the Gramlins beliefs and ideals laid out in the Codex of War and that because of this, the idea of abusing the unconditional surrender wouldn't happen, and claims that if IRON had accepted unconditional surrender when first offered, IRON would be free from terms before the ESA were passed. People are mad because they believe Ramirus is running what was once a very well respected alliance into the ground. The Gramlins one had 80 (?) nations in their prime (I don't remember cause I was MIA for about a year), and now they only have 19 (?) last I checked.

    Ramirus believes that IRON is continuing ideas that were fought against in the Karma war; the idea that you can attack anyone for any reason as long as you're strong enough. IRON and most others believe that Ramirus was setting a precedent for allowing unconditional surrenders which could easily be abused. Additionally, Ramirus is kind of a dick sometimes and talks down at basically everyone playing the game. He uses real life concepts that probably don't have any place in the game and this makes it hard for anyone to sympathize with him.

    /summary

    edit: /biast probably

    edit2: /some of it might be wrong too...
    [/quote]

    thank you for that well written explanation, its very informative. sorry to the mod about making this thread cus i didnt kno it wasnt allowed. just please dont ban me.

  13. THE DARK LORDS SURRENDER

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Fizzydog' date='06 July 2010 - 10:38 AM' timestamp='1278434295' post='2361189']
    TOLWYN, will you ever try again? If so, you have my support. You are one of my favorite users. It makes me sad that you aren't allowed to post in caps and you surrendered.
    [/quote]

    yes well sometimes we have to swallow our pride. i failed in my mission but nothing is guaranteed.

  14. the gremlins

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by TOLWYN

    im sorry but i tried to read that and i was confused right from the start. it would be nice if someone could just explain in a meaningful way wats going on. why is there even a war in the first place.

  17. THE DARK LORDS SURRENDER

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by TOLWYN

    sadly i have failed in my task to reunify the black team. the enemies of reunification were too great and too many, and the resources of a humble nation such as mine are not infinite. as such i surrender to the enemies of black reunification, especially facepunch alliance and order of teh sword.

    i have failed in my mission and am very sad. please accept these terms and dont make fun of this thread. i just want the war to end.

    sorry to those nations on black who were going to see real change from the normal but i guess that wont happen now.

    signed,
    tolwyn, leader of the dark lords.

    also mods close this thread once they agree to my surrender please.

  20. The Sword gets Federated

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    yeah so what its easier for you, you have 400 more infrastructure than i do. and you were at the max strength in my range to declare on me. all in all im doing pretty well considering the fact i have limited resources and im outnumbered three to one against enemies who are bigger than me (well two of them are i already took care of the other one lmfao)

    i am winning battles due to my sheer military wit, which can not be matched up against no matter how many cruise missiles you use.

  21. The Sword gets Federated

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    cowards! you sent a nation after me with 400 more infrastructure than i have. but that is of little importance, as i have bested him in battle so far. too afraid to fight somebody bigger than you? i have also anarchied one of your nations. i am doing so much more damage to OTS than they are doing to me, yet they insist on continuing the war.

    even though im outnumbered three to one i continue to inflict massive damage and gain huge profits. i will be expecting your request for unconditional surrender soon.

  25. A LIST OF DEMANDS

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by TOLWYN

    [quote name='Penkala' date='03 July 2010 - 03:25 PM' timestamp='1278192287' post='2358977']
    You're annoying and unfunny.
    [/quote]

    CLEARLY YOU HAVE MISSED THE POINT. MY INTENTION IS NOT TO ANNOY, NOR TO BE FUNNY, BUT TO UNITE THE BLACK TEAM. AND ALSO TO GET BACK WHAT WAS TAKEN FROM ME.

    I DONT UNDERSTAND THE RIDICULOUS SARCASM IN THIS THREAD. IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE SERIOUS THEN PERHAPS YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SHOULD GO AWAY. I AM TRYING TO UNITE THE BLACK TEAM YET YOU ATTEMPT TO UNDERMINE OUR PURPOSE.

×
×
  • Create New...