Jump to content

bcortell

Members
  • Posts

    843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bcortell

  1. TOP's been on a roll as of late. First, the Holocaust AA protection, and now leaks. At least they're keeping us entertained.
  2. When he says that they coordinated with us about it, it might not be blaming us, but it certainly implies we gave them permission or saw nothing wrong with it. Him mentioning us (TOP front) at all in the TLR hit/NG entrance is ridiculous.
  3. No one told me to do anything. I just didn't trust you and AI to run anything correctly- not when my AA's fate was to be considered. I think my concerns were shown to be more than valid throughout the war. You want to look that one up, too, Brehon? I would love to see someone say hey bcortell go do this before several weeks of already doing it.
  4. You read the slight, so it did happen, right? He corrected himself because he got told he was full of shit by hart. Have to save face after that. He wouldn't want to be called a liar.
  5. hart only thinks he holds my leash. Ask AI if they held my leash at any time ever (before, during, or after the war). It wasn't about Brehon corrected himself or not. It's that he doesn't actually look it up beforehand and just assumes it was me (or TOP front). He's now done it multiple times, and it's hilarious. He's been called out/corrected every time and only then says he made the mistakes. I didn't say you claimed to be without mistakes. We both know that isn't true.
  6. Are you saying Brehon or Rush made a mistake? And damn, I really need to stay away from this cesspool that is the OWF.
  7. I read the entire thread. I just find it hilarious and highly entertaining when you don't do your due diligence before you make a post. Instead, you just say it was the TOP front (clearly not right). Do some thinking before pressing post, and this wouldn't be an issue. Who holds the leash again?
  8. Rush, you reading this? Next time know what you're talking about. This is hilarious. Thank you for the entertainment. Can't run a war? Blame TOP front Don't know who wants reps (your allly)- blame TOP front. Don't know who told NpO it was ok to attack? ..Blame TOP front. in Brehon's mind, it must be TOP front's fault.
  9. It wasn't just him who posted about more war. I really wish the war forums were still up. They (AI) wanted more war up til NE changed his mind. Well before during and after people were saying what they were going to commit. Yes, their "current" government, not their government during the war. That is what is irrelevant. If you're looking at an event, look at who was in charge at the time, not who is now. I said nothing about IRON changing its mind. Make sure you know who you are responding to before busting out double standard bull shit. Either way, nice job with the cancellation IRON.
  10. Many in AI wanted more war. There was a sudden change in it by NE right before the final peace was done (after the initial talks and all). I'm sure there are suspicions as to why or who influenced the change.
  11. [url=http://cn-sengoku.com/forum/]Sengoku[/url] Our history- We came from a variety of alliance- BN, OMFG, TIO, FEAR, and others. Our community- We have an active forum and IRC community of mature, intelligent people. Who we're looking for- If you feel like you're a match for our community, willing to learn, and like warring, you might be a fit for us. If you would like to apply (you will not just be accepted) please follow these steps- 1. Go to http://cn-sengoku.com/forum/index.php?app=core&module=global&section=register 2. Create an account (please use your ruler name for your account name) 3. Go to http://cn-sengoku.com/forum/index.php?/topic/11-how-to-apply-for-sengoku-membership/ and apply for Sengoku Membership. 4. Message [url=http://www.cybernations.net/send_message.asp?Nation_ID=381201]bcortell[/url] or [url=http://www.cybernations.net/send_message.asp?Nation_ID=489788]hartfw[/url] that you have created an application. 5. From there, we will guide you on the rest of the process.
  12. I'm not surprised anyone in TPF (or TPF's gov) besides JudgeX and Roadie know anything, to be honest. They weren't allowed to do anything with other AA's. As for dirt, eh. I don't know if I would call any of it dirt. TPF already said they were trying to get tech, and we already said it was wise for them to back off from their demands.
  13. Didn't read the thread. Hopefully you can run a war better than Brehon. Or, I guess, depending on what side I'm on next war (right, Brehon?) maybe not.
  14. We weren't going to leave AI to burn..
  15. There were disagreements in what the people on TOP wanted. He didn't say there was an initial demand. He said there were disagreements, which there were. What you demanded was certainly unreasonable, and it was wise of you guys to back off of it quickly, especially considering what you guys were doing during the war. Nice Job.
  16. The writing seems to be on the wall for SF/XX, which seems foolish for NPO unless they want to play second fiddle to DH for the foreseeable future.
  17. TOP never had the option to redeploy on AI.
  18. Are you becoming one of its client states, too?
  19. I don't think I've ever seen so much talk about peace in a DoW before.
  20. You're like this little kid.. That's amazing.
  21. I'll just point this out (even though pretty much everyone knows). The above quote is from a guy who didn't have access to any level of discussion above member within PF. As such, he has very little knowledge of what was discussed. Also, it is true that TOP didn't want any PF AA's to have ties to AI (for a few reasons). I do believe at one point later in the discussion that the possibility of an ODAP was brought up, though.
  22. I know UE are monsters at war, but I think their NS might be a little off.
  23. Bumping this. Spoilers don't seem to work with Chrome. They do, however, work with FF. Please fix it for all browsers (or at least Chrome).
×
×
  • Create New...