trimm

I see no reason why we should determine what our relations to GPF, whatever they may be, are based upon the opinions of others.

Aren't you clever.

[quote name='GulagArchipelago' timestamp='1327288276' post='2905177'] How about Argent release a list of those they are protecting and let Planet Bob have fun with the rest of em? [/quote] We'll get right back to you on that friend.

Let's just say that it wouldn't be prudent to simply hear one side of the story here and leap to dramatic conclusions from it. People are getting a tad too excited, which while not surprising given that this is the OWF, is still not called for.

We will protect our interests regardless of other people's bad blood, and you can be assured of that. I'll echo what Otter said, folks need to slow it way down here.

Then that would be an unfortunate choice on the part of that coalition.

Folks need to slow their roll here.

While the Spartan nations I fought covered themselves in glory, I'm not sure I'd go about bragging on your overall performance this war.

UE more than carried their weight, they have as much right to have signatures there as anyone.

Finally. Good luck to Sparta in your future.

I wouldn't say that FARK and FAN deserve any leniency from NPO, but good for them taking the high road. That being said, don't be surprised that when you turn down white peace once, it doesn't get offered again.

This will end well I'm sure.

Congratulations to the Legion on your hard earned victory, and it is a victory despite how your foes might try to spin it. MK/VE...well, congratulations for managing to avoid embroiling yourselves in a real CF there guys.

That sounds about right.

Ohhhhh, now it all makes sense!

If anyone complains about Polar doing this anywhere in this thread, they are officially full of bull.

The fix is in! Oh, wait...

I think you should all hang for such a monumental wasting of everyone's time. Fail alliances are fail.

Maybe, maybe not. Our actions have consequences, whether we try to duck them or not.

Yknow, you should probably be rolled yourselves for this nonsense, among other things.

Given the DoW that was posted, it's pretty flipping hard to argue otherwise, yknow.

Once more unto the breach etc...

War is good for business, even a frakking stupid one. No hard feelings STA, I still have a lot of respect for you guys.

Because certain people believe that it doesn't matter what the letter of a treaty says, or what the actions of your treaty partner are, that an alliance should go to war just because a treaty makes them "friends". Give me a break folks.

Not to mention that the validity of the CB is not by any means airtight, nor is it the most airtight one even recently. And even if I concede the CB, neither ConC or DBDH are obligated to defend ActTi, and Battalion certainly didn't do any reasonable amount of diplomacy to bring them into the fold. In fact, I daresay he did a worse job of diplomacy with his allies than his enemies here.