Jump to content

Lamorak

Members
  • Posts

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lamorak

  1. Fancy words of propaganda. You know full well both of it is basically fully impossibly while we are opposed to the Doombirds.
  2. Oh please, stop that posturing. It's not like we have much of a choice. Basically we either kiss the backends of DBDC or stay a mid tier alliance. Unlike you, most of us prefer the latter.
  3. Like getting raided every few months by the same group of nations?
  4. I am not arguing against you because of any pro-/anti-DBDC stance, but because your very premise is unlikely to happen. Everyday the opportunity you speak of is getting smaller and smaller as the risk to fight DBDC rises. In the future it will even be more attractive for most alliances to fight "Dave" and "Roll Polaris" like war than before. Unless DBDC antagonizes most of the top heavy aliiances, which are left, at once, I can't see the formation of any opposition that might have a chance to take down the Doombirds.
  5. That's a matter of opinion, personally I don't see anything interesting ahead. Basically you are trading one stagnant political state of affairs against another without much happening to shake the landscape.
  6. Well, you tell us. Your DoW didn't contain many informations about your reason(s).
  7. Most wars, most damage taken and second most damage done. Yeah, totally hiding in PM.
  8. Well, my mistake, I entered "DT Probes" in the forum search and only this thread came up.
  9. Maybe you should have put up an announcement that DT Probes is part of your alliance, if it really is. But im probably asking too much from alliances that prefer to use one-liners as DoWs, if they post them at all. Or use ominous crimes one alliance supposedly commited some unspecified time in the past as a justification to attack another alliance.
  10. Supplying nations with tech that are at war with us is the opposite of uninvolved.
  11. Best logic ever. "I am totally for imposing terms, but I don't like those imposing terms for imposing terms"
  12. Yeah, hitting us would be a change for once. :rolleyes:
  13. I give you a hint. Again. Considering from where it started that's actually quite impressive.
  14. 3 nuclear battles, I am totally impressed... wait I am not. You are fighting in a tier your side has the advantage in a war your side has the advantage. Talk is easy in such a situation.
  15. If you like fighting that much, maybe you should try to get into the range where most of the fighting is taking place.
  16. It was clear who would win once the first DoW was posted. So we could have stopped right there.
  17. Tell me more about it, it's not like your side is doing basically the same with all the treaty chess going on. Edit: Also, a nice shift of argument. At first we are the ones declaring an all out war then we weasel out on declaring wars.
  18. First of all, I am sticking to the actual words in our Declaration, anything else is an interpretation, your side's interpreatation, meaning your side is doing the spinning. Secondly, I wonder how a rather unspecific thread ("we reserve the right to add any nation sending tech to DBDC to our target lists and they may be attacked at anytime.") is worse than actual attacks against our nations and those of our allies in the past half year or so? Thirdly, wasn't it common practise to consider those nations aiding alliances you are at war with to commit an act of war?
  19. Now, did we declare an all out war against any alliance or did we threaten war on any nation sending tech to DBDC? I'm a bit confused as those 2 things arent exactly the same.
  20. I wouldn't really call it internal conflict if 2 people are arguing on a public forum about stuff from god knows how many years ago that's unrelated to their current alliance.
  21. I am sorry we help out our allies if they request our help. As to the rest, obvious propaganda is obvious.
  22. Where did Dajobo ever make this certain reprisal of "eternal war"? Also stop trying to make fancy words and try to use arguments instead.
  23. You keep using that phrase, I do not think it means what you think it means. How is it "threatening eternal war" when there are exit options that arent really that far-fetched? Edit: Also funny how you needed to quote AlmightyGrub to show how Dajobo personally threatened someone with eternal war.
×
×
  • Create New...