Jump to content

Old Major

Members
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Animalism
  • Alliance Name
    Basketball Ninjas
  • Resource 1
    Cattle
  • Resource 2
    Uranium
  • CN:TE Nation Name
    Animalism

Old Major's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. What is this? Oh, formalities. Guess it's nice to have it on paper. Thanks for the omic, Jack. And congrats on the first official treaty, new bn leadership. I'll ignore the fact that it was a complete layup ;P
  2. Your dedication has been unbelievable, and i'm sure you know BN wouldn't be what it is today without you, in any shape or form. I'm glad that you're going to get to enjoy playing at a more manageable pace now. Good luck to our new 3! Hope you've had your parenting lessons.
  3. Schad will be sent to the yards for a few rouns wth bc, surely.
  4. Nevermind, BC addressed it as I thought for too long...
  5. If a navy is useless, don't buy it and let it bloat your NS. If you have 4 nukes and 20mn, you should have bought more nukes. Everyone we declared on was a top ranked nation, and that's how we chose targets. That, along with alliance hoppers/war avoiders that we felt deserved getting hit. It feels like a total ******* move by us because it was meant to be. No more hiding, no more BS, per our DoEEEEE this round.
  6. I do understand the frustration and irritation, that was half part of my own goal here. What I don't understand are the calls for us to confess to something, as if we are lying about something. BC lays it out in the first post: this is a **** move so that we can have fun at your expense. Finally, if you're complaining about a nuke and NS differential while sitting on 35mn, calm down. Go buy yourself some troops with that massive warchest and hit back.
  7. In general, we are strongly encouraging you and all of your alliance mates to indeed hit the aggressors and the rest of PS back. We want wars.
  8. [quote name='NeoGandalf' timestamp='1321852078' post='2847796'] According to your post, PS combined has twice the NS of whoever they attacked - and those that were attacked are in many separate alliances (harder to coordinate). Additionally, a nation with the same NS as another one but in nuclear anarchy and no cash is a different story from one that has been building for weeks. As far as flag running initiatives go, I don't think you need to be hitting two alliances that just peaced out less than 24 hours ago. [/quote] No, PS has half the NS of everyone else we attacked.
  9. 18.5k declaring on 16.2k is a bad down declare? And as BC said, the overall NS is drastically in favor of 'them'.
  10. [quote name='dealmaster13' timestamp='1320794576' post='2841886'] [size="3"]much like the alliances OP, PS and LE in that particular order[/size] [/quote] I take issue with this. At least if we were at either end of the list, we could make unapologetic assumptions. But you had to stick us right in the middle.
  11. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=105275
  12. [quote name='Victor Von Doom' timestamp='1319543713' post='2832050'] Didn't realize just how heavy a "Destructor Fleet" was until I had to carry it for 4 days. Why couldn't you guys have thrown TPC in the mix with us? Scared? [/quote] This post. Just, bravo.
  13. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=470753 Fish/Marble
×
×
  • Create New...