Jump to content

tehol

Members
  • Posts

    1,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tehol

  1. yaas answering to get notification when pip is uploaded so I can figure out how to get it
  2. Your response to me is fair and correct in all respects. The situation was similar in some ways but different in more important ways, namely: (1) NLON had also pulled out of truce early, which D1 has not done here (2) NLON's war was a down declare. I'm referring to this thread:
  3. Lol, didnt literally this exact same thing happen last year in reverse? NLON declared on another aa, D1 accused them of trying to avoid a war?
  4. Our CLAWS are better but these are neat
  5. It's possible I'm mistaken on the "2 days" item. But I seem to recall it being an issue between NLON and D1, I thought. D1 won round 50. Look at the prizes: Peak Nation Strength - 51481.07 - Scotlando ruled by JirosMost Government Bills - 173,783,283.91 - Jack and Bean ruled by JimBundyMost Popular - 56 Senate Votes - Ithaca ruled by UlyssesMost Land - 4,359.16 - Killie ruled by bunnetMost Nuclear Launches - 102 - Gilas ruled by hagdang batoMost Destructive War - 49,974.70 - The Cell Games Arena vs AngmarAlliance With Most Soldiers Killed - DEFCON 1 - 10,718,721 KillsMost Attacking Casualties in DEFCON 1 #1 - 301,019 Casualties - Carpet Beetle ruled by Carpet BeetleMost Attacking Casualties in DEFCON 1 #2 - 292,062 Casualties - wapayabass ruled by l Tosh l It's not a down-declare if you are defending in the war. It's fighting back against an updeclare.
  6. Oh, sorry there is one more thing actually, about HG's Round 50 comments: despite our alleged unfair tactics that round, D1 still destroyed us. Hence my signature quoting Lyanna "I have never seen someone get so mad about winning".
  7. I believe all of the above speaks for itself, except I would add that I've previously seen HG claim the minimum time between wars was 2 days, which I dutifully respected.
  8. The funniest thing about this is how HG and Mitten are effectively the mascots of each D1 and D2: they share a near perfect ability to deny facts that don't conform withtheir crocodile tears, a mirror image reflection in each.
  9. Oh, and special thanks to NLON! From saving us from D1's side swipe while we were responding to D2's spy ops during "peace"
  10. Round 55 has been ... eventful so far. AW started the round, howling from the gates: In that thread, D1 admits to starting the dirty op dumpster fire (specifically, Bato conducts dirty ops, AW asks D1 to stop or we will be forced to retaliate, and HG refuses). Meanwhile, SToR offers to help attack D1 with AW on a specific day in the future. But, curiously, is "held up" by a single rogue. With some diplomatic prowess demonstrated by yours truly, the "rogue" (in reality a cultist who was merely tasting some waste) offers peace to SToR. Nonetheless... SToR delays, thus prompting AW's DNS attack: AW agreed to peace with D1. HG asked for a period of peace: and AW said "fair enough", and offered a suggested deal: Which was agreed to: And then violated: Not only was the peace violated, it was violated while AW was at war with SToR and OP. Despite AW's inclusion of NLON in its DNS Attack, we truly have a soft spot for the historic alliance. So it was with some consternation when we saw SToR not only continue to ignore D1, and not only ignore OP, but also to hit NLON, who was still recovering from the DNS attack. This prompted our second attack on SToR. At this point, our suspicions that SToR is really "D2" are becoming more and more clear: Regardless, we peaced out with D2 eventually: And shortly thereafter, we agreed to peace with D1: And yet, spy ops, dirty spy ops from D2 continued, despite agreement to peace from D2's leaders. And AW responded: Of course, we never actually wanted to fight D2 this round. Our focus has been on D1 (and it remains so). But D2 would not agree to peace, and it slowly became unambiguous that there *is no SToR*, there is only D1, and D2: Especially once D2 removed the facade: Of course, we were blind to reality, and tried to reach peace on reasonable grounds anyway: Of course, instead, D1 simply hit us, as requested by D2 I would presume. And then when we asked for peace, with a truce period as previously requested by D1, peace was rejected: Although D1 was not willing to agree to peace, D2 was: And yet, as hostilities with D1 continued, D2 has decided to again join the fray: And here we stand.
  11. Today, Alpha Wolves declares war on SToR. Or ... did they declare war on us? It's not really clear, to be honest.
  12. I will remember this next time you're under attack from a third party.
  13. For the record, neither I nor anyone in AW ever asked BC to attack anyone. I did ask BC (specifically, the stallion) to stop attacking SToR so that SToR would help join fight against D1 as suggested by SToR approximately day 3. And later I publicly announced my thanks to BC for fighting the good fight. But BC's attacks on D1 were actually a wrench in my plans. I would have preferred they left D1 alone earlier on so we could have handled them. Had they, say, attacked OP instead, I might not have foolishly agreed to a period of peace that D1 broke. It's also possible we would have roughed up D1 better. But BC are good fighters these days it seems and I respect BC's choice of targets and their pursuit of "taste the waste".
  14. Shortly after AW made its DNS attack: SToR decides NLON is a good target: However, what about poor OP? They haven't had a war all round. AW seeks to remedy this injustice: FIRST, by declaring war on SToR for attempting to steal AW's XP farm; and SECOND, by declaring war on OP, for its lack of involvement in any wars to date in round 55. That is all
  15. I mean, we did just declare on basically everyone except boognish. I suppose it wasn't strict "you"/D1 though and to be clear, I *dont* think we're that good. I literally just said that you, Defcon 1, might yet win again, despite getting rocked so far. Because I think *you're* that good.
×
×
  • Create New...