Ponderas

o/ us. Or is that tacky?

[quote name='monkeybum' date='26 April 2010 - 04:45 PM' timestamp='1272314683' post='2276339'] This whole debate has seemed to outlived its usefulness. I see no point in continuing arguments over semantics. [/quote] Agreed. Best of luck to the new alliance. I'm still a bit confused over the name thing, but Erik and Joamer are still my friends regardless of this debacle, and I wish them luck.

[quote name='baskan' date='25 April 2010 - 03:58 PM' timestamp='1272225482' post='2274684'] does that clear things up? Im always at the right place at the right time [/quote] Were you also in #ucn just now? o.O.

[quote name='TheFlyingLobster' date='25 April 2010 - 02:22 PM' timestamp='1272219736' post='2274539'] I'd just like to point out that it seems the remaining government of UCN was attempting to go through some softer ways of breaking this bombshell onto the UCN membership, and this thread was not started by UCN government, but in fact a general member/membership flip-flopper. This greatly effected to disbandment. Such news was not meant to go mass-public for another day or so as everything was put in order. But it seems some of the membership couldn't wait until it was all worked out and posted this thread. [/quote] Hmm, it seems like I need to join into this conversation now. I was the ex-Minister of Finance of the UCN, and did not resign, but was displaced by the disbandment. Moth is right. Zara had resigned before the disbandment and therefore had no authority to post the official thread. But no use crying over spilled milk anyway. To those of you who say stuff about how the government was acting out of line, keep in mind, there are less than five people who openly disagree with the disbandment at this time. We were trying to act in the best interests of the membership, and this move would help the majority of the membership. The AA of the United Commonwealth of Nations is now currently down to 55 total members, well under the peak of 128 in February. Now, half of the peaked membership has already changed AA's, which signifies a passive acceptance of their elected government's decisions. Only two people are currently struggling to keep UCN together. It's clear the government had the general consent of the membership of the UCN. I'm probably going to get uber-flamed for speaking up now, but I need to put in my two cents. GOONS, your waiver is greatly appreciated. I believe we still owed $39 mil in reps, and this move is like a gift from above.

[quote name='suryanto tan' date='06 February 2010 - 06:46 AM' timestamp='1265456806' post='2164253'] It is my view that when an alliance cannot longer fight, they should admit defeat and surrender honorably. There is nothing wrong with admitting defeat. In fact, it is very honorable act, but it shows lack of competency in term of military readiness. I humbly encourage those criticizing The Immortals to give them a fair treatment. I agree if you say that they are incompetence (to fight this large scale war), but you cannot claim that they are in disgrace for surrendering to the enemy. If Nusantara cannot longer fight, we will admit defeat and surrender to the enemy. Part of the sport is admitting defeat when it is due. An alliance that decide to surrender is much more honorable than an alliance that insist to stay in the war but with 90% of the members hide in peace mode and inflicting almost 0 damage to the enemy, but keep singing the heroic song clear and loud that they are the most honorable folks for holding out the longest. I have no respect for such kind of alliance. They are only posturing, not fighting, but they pretend to be toughest. Gentlemen, you have pointed your finger at the wrong direction. The Immortals is just fine in my opinion. [/quote]What he said.

[quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' date='04 February 2010 - 12:43 AM' timestamp='1265262206' post='2158175'] Let's go! Candy and Blues Clues for all! [/quote] Oooh, Me, ME!