Jump to content

Supreme Emperor Daeg

Members
  • Posts

    190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Supreme Emperor Daeg

  1. I think I'm mostly neutral about rolling the neuts, though I do consider their crimes against bacon (in 2018) to be sufficient reason to raid them.
  2. Lets see what's the most complicated answer possible. Unofficially official response is that SW raided GPA in a raidy raid that was raidishly raiding. What we have now is a cross roads.
  3. If anything I will have less. But its okay, I wouldn't know what to do with a proper war chest even if I had one. GPA is at least a respectful opponent, I like that in both friends and foes.
  4. I recognize this written attack and as such have to possibly consider the recognition of your recogniziation of our raid. Also I'm willing to go on the record that its whatever kinda war you want it to be, defensive, offensive, verbal... Were flexible.
  5. Wait Starwars themed announcement, with one of them New something something Order types... Whew, its Jedi and Pacifica. I can heartily approve of that.
  6. Friendly raiding sounds nicer than hostilities, but okay. We do rarely post treaties, I think we did a post for joining cng... but that was the exception not the rule, all our treaties have a wall o' text that goes with them we just dont clutter the owf with it. Enjoy your hostilities, we will enjoy our raids, casualties for everyone involved. Have fun everybody.
  7. Let us see what if I have found it acceptable or not... status: Accepted. Okay, I too find it acceptable.
  8. Clearly we need Franz to weigh in on this... its not official otherwise.
  9. I think SLAP had a variety of valid CB's 1.) Alexio, the best CB of all time good for any occasion 2.) Accepting a nation at war for those who like a more traditional CB 3.) oA clause in our treaty with AM means our entry with ally is valid. I could keep going but I think it is enough to know that yes there was a collection of CBs all presented on a silver platter. Absolutely, if they had stuck it out for even a couple of rounds they could have got us to do white peace. We like short fun wars, but surrendering in less than a single round is a bit too short. I admit I hadn't even read the terms, but I don't read the opening terms in most negotiations. Seriously who takes the first offer? At least make a good counter offer... In any case, I wish OoT well going forward.
  10. It is vital that one makes sure that one's Ojwardsc is pointed in the right direction, always point your Ojwardsc in the direction of victory.
  11. Indeed... For Alexio is the great CB of our time, may he lead us Ojwardsc to victory!
  12. For Alexio, we have to ojwardsc them all to death.
  13. Too late, we already started to ojwardsc to victory and now we don't know how to stop.
  14. Good sir, while I may not speak on behalf of A-team I can assure you that we here at SLAP have a policy on raiding, If we raid you that is good and proper if you raid us... we kick your teeth down your neck, as is good and proper. I would think that A-teams actions also would indicate a pro-raiding leaning, as they seem to be raiding as we speak. I wouldn't wish for there to be any confusion as to our stance on a matter of such import.
  15. So you're saying it's just a case of bad lighting? Oh well then, A-team better turn up the lights...
  16. This reminds me a bit of a tragic play written by a bard. Act 1, Scene 1. YOLO Nay, as they dare. I will spit at them, which is disgrace to them if they bear it. WillyPete Do you spit at us, sir? YOLO I do spit, sir. WillyPete Do you spit at us, sir? YOLO (Aside to Sir William) Is the law on our side if I say ay? Sir William (Aside to YOLO) No. YOLO No, sir, I do not spit at you, sir, but I spit upon you, sir. Jalap Do you quarrel, sir? YOLO Quarrel, sir? No, sir. But if you do, sir, I am for you. I serve as good a man as you.
  17. Congratulations on getting a good deal TMG. Glad to see that is settled. Hails for the generous alliances that gave TMG a second chance.
×
×
  • Create New...