Hello planed bob,
i have some simple questions for you, which i'm sure will receive many witty remarks and a $%&@ton of flaming but i will persist
Why is it that every day here on bob that an alliances word is taken over a single nations word?
And why is it that it is not as honourable to fight for your own nation on your own then to fight an alliance with hundreds of other members who dont understand why their fighting another alliance?
why is one single nation not expected to succeed, unless of course said nation is a member of an alliance he did not help build?
Why do alliances send out mass messages to non-AA's promising them protection from raiders, but they raid themselves?
you may say that alliances are friends that help and protect each other, but then the same person may say it is foolish to sign treaties signifying friendship, isnt that the same thing? isnt an alliance just one big treaty between its members?
all this being said, why isnt "cybernations"-"cyberalliances"?
you may commence flaming, and trying to pick apart my logic with your cruel and witty remarks.....