Jump to content

Sir Dingly Dang

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Sir Dingly Dang

  • Birthday August 12

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    The Moment
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Izzardia
  • Resource 1
    Coal
  • Resource 2
    Water

Sir Dingly Dang's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1302538264' post='2688590'] Exactly: [i]In vino veritas[/i] [/quote] I thought it was "In Jägermeister veritas"
  2. [quote name='Il Impero Romano' timestamp='1302534844' post='2688566'] Log dumps from me inebriated after getting home at 5am from a long night abroad from Il Impero Romano are certainly indicative of my person.[/quote] Well, to be fair....
  3. [quote name='youwish959' timestamp='1295548136' post='2586757'] Those treaties were not conflicting until you declared war. Unless, what your saying is you have specifically been targeting Polaris for sometime. [/quote] Actually, spying on VE is what made the treaties conflicting ; regardless, as soon as war broke out, RoK was in a tough position because of those treaties, which is what sucks. Once there was a CB, RoK was put in the middle of two allies. Had NpO declared on VE, RoK would have been mandated to defend VE. When VE attacks NpO, they are mandated to defend NpO. There only other choice is to ignore/drop a treaty, which isn't any better. And as my original post said, [b]after[/b] this war, they should look at their existing treaties, because now the one with NpO and the one with VE are in conflict.
  4. [quote name='youwish959' timestamp='1295546864' post='2586717'] That is outrageous. Attacking an ally's ally puts allies in untenable positions. Especially on such short notice. [/quote] Not without the conflicting treaties.
  5. Did I miss Rok declaring on VE? I thought they merely declared on an alliance who hit their MD partner. Disappointing, in that VE would prefer to be fighting along side Rok instead of on the opposite side, but expected, as VE too would come to the defense of a MD partner who was attacked. They didn't pick sides, they activated their treaty and declined to pick sides in conflicting treaties (NpO and VE). Until I see a Rok nation hitting a VE nation, good luck on the battlefield Rok and I personally hope you review your treaties after this war and decide which ally is a better ally. If you decide it is Polaris and not VE, then so be it. But conflicting treaties suck, they put allies in untenable positions.
  6. [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1294296157' post='2565542'] I don't care if you think we are harboring the Anti-Christ himself, you tell us first. [/quote] I think we're harboring the Antichrist.
  7. I'm still trying to figure out why a nation over 1000 days old with nuclear capability needs protection against tech raiders.
  8. [quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' timestamp='1293503859' post='2555753'] Then challenge his protection notice. [/quote] We don't raid.
  9. He appears unaligned by choice. He's sending out tons of aid, and he's a pretty big boy to have 13 days seniority in his one person alliance. This isn't some new nation needing protection because the ruler doesn't understand life on Planet Bob. He's been around for 1063 days. He needs protection why, again?
  10. [quote name='Vivi' timestamp='1292748529' post='2544226'] VE has updated their image. [/quote] Uh, no we didn't, at least not by anyone approved. What the heck happened?
  11. [quote name='Smooth' timestamp='1292723373' post='2543392'] The pot. [/quote] Can't we be both?
  12. [quote name='Bill Wallace' timestamp='1282661504' post='2429433'] You're not going to find 300 sycophants mindlessly following a cult of personality in the VE. [/quote] Damn, I missed the memo. o/ Impero
  13. [quote name='HeroofTime55' timestamp='1281720429' post='2414498'] I don't recall you talking with the Sith after the aid was sent. I recall you making yourself scarce up until the DoW. So pray tell how the Sith could have told you anything? Or perhaps I have my information wrong... Can you provide proof that you were in talks between when the aid was sent and when you declared war? [/quote] Doesn't the second log of the OP show communication after the aid was sent?
×
×
  • Create New...