Jump to content

ReadyFireAIm

Members
  • Posts

    158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ReadyFireAIm

  1. Just for the record, I have no idea why Lazaraus is getting involved in this thread. He is in no way affiliated with The Abyss and we did not know of his rogue plans. He was not put up to this by Confusion, at least as far as I know. If there is evidence to the contrary you can private message me here or message me on irc. Otherwise please take talks about rogues to a separate thread please also, well fought match to LE and NB. I don't believe in revenge or grudge matches since it is better suited for SE, so those expecting any kind of revenge will be disappointed. I will give them credit though for spying away a large number of nukes and catching us off guard. We certainly did not expect a Monday war
  2. [quote name='Frostfirefox' date='17 July 2010 - 12:43 AM' timestamp='1279345367' post='2375548'] This goes for many comments here as well-http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=88948 I'm prone to agree the war was highly dis favorable to The Abyss, by over 100k NS. For those who think it was close, your as ignorant as ReadyFireAim assuming the reasons for the DoW. But there is a point, when one is too blind (those who simply jump in to repeat what a few have said to many times already). Assumptions of other alliances (or other people in general) is stupidity. But stating that The Abyss was largely out favored in the war is nothing more than a fact, and denying this shows your amazing math skills =3 (sarcasm, for what its worth). Many of the posters are now just acting childish. Like a schoolyard bully. That kid threw a rock at that other kid, so let's all do it! 'Bawling' could be true, to a limit, but you guys are 'Bawling' over their 'Bawling', so it makes 0 sense. A curbstomp is a curbstomp, if you want to do it, do it. But don't try to lie and say it's not, or rub it in their face like you are the champion of Steve. Fools. [/quote] It's pretty sad that you're the only one who sees it this way considering you're a pain. Actually, a few see it this way too, but most just dislike CDT or me and hate to admit it. The war is over. That is that. But yes, these opponents of ours were going for the curbstomp here. There's no getting around it. It was either let us grow for another week and become way too powerful, or take us out now (and hit us extremely hard) so we can't come back later in the round. It was as tactic they did well. But was it honorable? It might not matter anymore.
  3. [quote name='Fizzydog' date='16 July 2010 - 04:22 PM' timestamp='1279315320' post='2374996'] Yeah, only one problem: Danzig continued attacks. http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1002258 To: Josef Bieber From: Danzig Date: 7/16/2010 12:04:12 AM Subject: Battle Report Message: You have been attacked by Danzig. You lost 2 soldiers and 0 tanks. You killed 2 soldiers and 0 tanks. Their forces razed 8.212 miles of your land, stole 2.014 technology, and destroyed 5.525 infrastructure. Their forces looted $226.61 from you and you gained $0.00 in your enemy's abandoned equipment. In the end the battle was a Defeat. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. To: Josef Bieber From: Danzig Date: 7/16/2010 12:04:04 AM Subject: Battle Report Message: You have been attacked by Danzig. You lost 3 soldiers and 0 tanks. You killed 5 soldiers and 0 tanks. Their forces razed 8.554 miles of your land, stole 2.014 technology, and destroyed 5.756 infrastructure. Their forces looted $238.53 from you and you gained $0.00 in your enemy's abandoned equipment. In the end the battle was a Defeat. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. To: Josef Bieber From: Danzig Date: 7/16/2010 12:02:30 AM Subject: Cruise Missile Attack Message: Your nation has been attacked with a cruise missile by Danzig. You lost 0 defending tanks, 1.01 technology, and 2.84 infrastructure. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. To: Josef Bieber From: Danzig Date: 7/16/2010 12:02:16 AM Subject: Cruise Missile Attack Message: Your nation has been attacked with a cruise missile by Danzig. You lost 0 defending tanks, 1.01 technology, and 5.03 infrastructure. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. :/ So much for peace. [/quote] Danzig is not, and has never been, a member. I'm not sure where he came from.
  4. [quote name='Burning Glory' date='16 July 2010 - 03:40 PM' timestamp='1279312797' post='2374956'] Thats right, you did hit OP the round before....Forgot about that, but didn't they just come out of a war or was already waring with another Aliance, either way, it was the only war all round you were in Also you never hit TPF, BUT yes you did hit TPC but as stated in my post only after we were at war with 2 or 3 other AA's, and you waited 3 or 4 days to make sure you had WC's and a healthy build up of troops. Not to mention you had more nukes than us, you know the same very thing your complaining about now. Only difference is they didn't wait till the war was mostly over before the other alliance jumped in...Call it honor No worries though, I don't hold grudges as what I said, "What comes around goes around" besides I think we won that war anyway,lol! Really though, lighten up its only a game. BG. [/quote] I'm not that started bringing up stuff from previous rounds. I try to start over each round. Just for the record, CDT did attack TPF about 3 rounds back, when we went to war with GDA and then TPF.
  5. [quote name='Prozenz' date='15 July 2010 - 11:04 PM' timestamp='1279253037' post='2374099'] Any stat of this war? [/quote] Stats would be inaccurate at this point. The opposing side had higher numbers all around, and any losses on their side were diminished by the high number of nations joining them after the start of the war. Mostly the Betamax and LE Cadet nations.
  6. [quote name='Burning Glory' date='15 July 2010 - 02:58 PM' timestamp='1279223888' post='2373334'] snip [/quote] CDT fought a 1v1 war with OP two rounds ago. And a 1v1 war with LE last round. You're just sore that CDT also happened to attack TPF (and I think TPC once) in previous rounds. Seriously, you're the last person that should be calling others out for this.
  7. [quote name='Son of Taeper' date='14 July 2010 - 03:10 PM' timestamp='1279138222' post='2371390'] If we count the members up it might look a bit fairer. Cadet only have 6 members, Abyss have 93. Is it 6 on 93 you are complaining about? Would it have been better that we merged forces prior to the war (like another alliance did) just so we could fight 1 alliance v 1 alliance. You seem to be suggesting it would be fair for RE or TPC to attack Trouble just because it's 1 alliance v another. Why stop there? RE could just attack a one man alliance and that would be ok? To be honest, I would rather fight in a 50 man alliance war than be a member of a 100 man team spread across 4 alliances, but that's just me I suppose. [/quote] You guys claim the numbers were similar at the beginning (even though they weren't) yet you have no trouble with having more nations join you during the war to partake in the curbstomp? And seriously, you allude to our merger with PU? What does that have to do with anything?!? We are allowed to merge with whoever we want. In fact, the merger was being discussed for the beginning of this round and was delayed for separate reasons. And the reason I bring up all 4 alliances is because your alliance keeps trying to paint this as some sort of fair war, yet both LE and NB have gotten members from other aa's to help them. Not so much LE (they have gotten a few), but NB are definitely going for the curbstomp by having Betamax nations join them and declare. This is how you want LE to be known? As an alliance who helps out flag chasers and carries out curbstomps for grudges from previous rounds?
  8. [quote name='commander thrawn' date='14 July 2010 - 12:58 AM' timestamp='1279087094' post='2370578'] This is the nonsense I am going on about. You are whining cause we used tactics. [/quote] Go back to playing SE if you think 4 alliances vs 1 is a good tactic (Le, LE cadet, Nordic Ballers, Betamax). Around here it's called cowardly. Enjoy the nuke
  9. [quote name='commander thrawn' date='13 July 2010 - 08:59 PM' timestamp='1279072774' post='2369995'] Dude, seriously let it go. No one cares, your whining will not make everyone bow down before you or want to be your friend. Yeah your alliance got attacked. It happens. It is your fault you guys are getting beat down. If you are weak in TE the effect is magnified because there is no aid to make up for your mistake. Whatever the motives for the war it is happening and you calling out the motives won't change a thing. So please just stop. [/quote] Haha, we were weak? That is why you needed two alliances, both with a combined higher strength and nuke count, to take us on? Good luck getting a flag this round
  10. [quote name='MNG Debo' date='13 July 2010 - 01:54 PM' timestamp='1279047263' post='2369467'] For the record, CDT did not beat us last round. So, did we win? Not quite, but in an important aspect we did. LE Total NS Loss: 120,856.54 CDT Total NS Loss: 127,660.06 Why didn't I post this last round...because I was busy in that part of the round, which also explains my lack of presence in your DoW thread. After having a slight statistical disadvantage and not to mention getting hit by the initial blitz, LE came back hard. Look at it however you want, but in the end it was a good fight and that's all we wanted. You keep assuming that LE wants revenge in this war. Take a look at your DoW thread last round. Any whining or anger coming from our side? Of course not because there was nothing to complain about. Why would LE want revenge? Your only proof is Bacon's one liner. Doesn't tell much of a revenge story especially when CDT's DoW thread comes into play. "return the favor"? Return a good fight, perhaps? It could have many interpretations when used in a nonspecific way, both good or bad. And yes, Abyss is not CDT. We get it now. Now move along... [/quote] Look, you may think this war is not about revenge for last round. But Bacon has made it very clear he equates CDT to Abyss, and sees this as revenge for last round. [quote][00:59] <+Bacon[LE]> think what you want. You guys arent avoiding a major war for 80% of the round this time [00:59] <%Dexomega[USN]> WHO DOES THAT? [00:59] <~crazypeople> haha [00:59] <~crazypeople> what?!? [00:59] <~crazypeople> again? [01:00] <~crazypeople> this is a new alliance dude [01:00] <+Bacon[LE]> CDT is where you're from[/quote] Your alliance members may have been civil throughout last round during the war. But your current leader definitely had the CDT-LE war in mind when he planned this one. I've been playing this game for a long time, and I was around when LE was still a very small alliance, and when Genesis merged with LE to create a very strong, active, and powerful alliance. Things have not been good the past few rounds. Yet, people still admired LE for defying all odds and going after alliances much larger than them (OP vs LE 3 rounds ago, TPC vs LE 2 rounds ago). Lately, you guys have sought curbstomps. You would rather preserve victory rather than challenge yourselves. How things have changed.
  11. [quote name='kong' date='13 July 2010 - 05:44 AM' timestamp='1279017879' post='2369201'] THE ABYSS's leader's whingeing is embarassing even to read. Just fight. TE=Fight Stop complaints please. You are supposed to be a tough Leader, role model for your own people. o/ to all fighters (not talkers) from LE,NB and Abyss [/quote] Things are different when you have to lead an alliance. Even as one of three government members. What you see as whining (since you are part of the attacking party), I see as making sure the reasons for war are made public. This is a union between flag chasers (NB) and a guy who wants revenge for stuff done last round. Go ahead and keep denying Bacon or your other leaders have not targeted us because of stuff some of our members did last round in a different aa. He's already provided enough evidence that LE is involved partly because of stuff done last round. IT happens. War happens.
  12. [quote name='Frostfirefox' date='13 July 2010 - 02:07 AM' timestamp='1279004848' post='2369112'] I don't mean to drag this on any further than necessary (only posting because I fought in the last rounds war), but your quoting a single IRC line out of context (if any applies). Do you think I'm a moron? 'Our turn to return the favor this round' is an easy statement to form into your own words, so you'll have to do better. Why would LE want revenge on a war that ended with both CDT and LE on the biggest losing alliance list as 1 and 2, and vice-versa depending on the day and hour. Bacon posted his reason, and your 'response to the DoW' is very incorrect..., which was my only point I intended to make. [/quote] Please read what Bacon wrote above. I'm assuming that's Bacon, right? [quote] I'll counter Point #1 with this. LE likes a good fight. You gave us one last round. Nation Count, NS etc all fairly even. We're returning the favor. (I've got our last round leader looking the full stats up to confirm.). This round. NB+LE also fairly even with The Abyss. Take a gander at the stats readily availible.[/quote] You gave us one last round. "You" refers to CDT. He is referring to last rounds war. I think even you can admit that. Returning the favor is getting revenge for last round. Now, you are saying that the current war isn't motivated by wanting to get back at the CDT members who fought them last round? Look, do all the fact checking you like. All I'm going off of is what Bacon said in our irc room, what he's said here, and what Lonewolfe said in some chats. The Abyss is NOT CDT. It is okay to fight a war, but LE's reasons for going to war are just wrong. Next time LE should fight a war because they want a good fight, not because they were hurt in a previous round and want revenge.
  13. [quote name='Morte Vallta' date='13 July 2010 - 01:34 AM' timestamp='1279002844' post='2369088'] I'll counter Point #1 with this. LE likes a good fight. You gave us one last round. Nation Count, NS etc all fairly even. We're returning the favor. (I've got our last round leader looking the full stats up to confirm.). This round. NB+LE also fairly even with The Abyss. Take a gander at the stats readily availible. And you're right. This wasn't a random target. Look at the stats. Not a stomp by any stretch of the imagination. No other targets were availible; due to pretty much everyone else getting involved in the earlier festivities. So please; continue to think it's revenge if it makes you feel better. As to the merger. Bad timing. War was already greenlit when it happened, especially given no formal announcement of the merger. Now let's get back to a good nuke-laden fight. May we all glow with that healthy green glow[/quote] We gave you nothing last round. 1/3 of the Abyss is CDT members. Get that straight. This is pretty hilarious given that you originally were targeting us before the merger. LE + NB were much larger than Abyss before the merger. Don't think we'll go down easy, but give us a few days and we would have been at least finished with the merger. Here was essentially your train of thought: Gah, I hate weekday wars. But if we wait another few days, they will be even bigger! Anyway, you wanted revenge. Bacon wanted revenge. Lonewolfe wants his flag. That's about the entire motivation for this war. You can claim other things, but it's pretty clear to all. And like I said before, bad precedent for your alliance to take.
  14. [quote name='Frostfirefox' date='13 July 2010 - 01:31 AM' timestamp='1279002658' post='2369085'] Take out the you guys. I am not more than one person. They share a similar motive, so they joined together. I personally do not think it matters if you title your alliance differently, it does not change those within. If your willing to claim victory to a war that was a draw, and then say CDT is no more so the war can not be finished, and somehow victory defaults to you, it clearly must be finished. But hey, I do not know their true intentions and neither do you. So you or I, or anyone who is not them, can not claim their cause of war off of assumption. [/quote] Sorry man, but Bacon came into our irc and stated it was a war for stuff done in previous rounds. The intentions of both these alliances is pretty clear, and it is what I stated before. [quote][00:55] <+Bacon[LE]> Our turn to return the favor this round[/quote] And no. The Abyss is not CDT. Look, The Abyss is made up of many other people. I am one of three leaders. You can continue saying it is the same alliance and thus revenge is possible. But it is not, because aside from 1/3 of the alliance, the rest are new members , new govt structure, new everything.
  15. [quote name='Frostfirefox' date='13 July 2010 - 01:10 AM' timestamp='1279001405' post='2369076'] "Beat" is a stretch for a war where both sides ended up on the ground. "Unfinished war" would be more accurate. [/quote] It would be unfinished if CDT even existed this round. They do not. The Abyss is a completely separate alliance. Does LE remember CDT ever having 80+ members? Seriously, you guys are setting a bad precedent here. This is a war being fought because you guys wanted revenge for last round. And Lonewolfe provided an avenue for that since his motive is to get a flag.
  16. Let me clarify a few things. First off, The Abyss have been declared on for two reasons 1. Some of our members, from CDT, fought LE last round and beat them. So LE is basically saying Abyss = CDT. And wants to get revenge for last round. 2. Nordic Ballers are the "guards" of a flag chasing alliance known as Betamax. Along with a few others. A few days ago, a few Abyss nations randomly found Betamax nations and raided them. We immediately offered peace after being asked by Lonewolfe. Now, for no real reason, Lonewolfe proceed to threaten The Abyss on two separate occasions. Likely due to his believe that we were interested in a flag. No, we were not. We told him to stop. Not in a pleasant manner, but essentially told him to stop threatening or else. Anyway, I don't mind a good fight. But would like to get the above out before people start believing we were randomly targeted. Also, it's not very nice to attack an alliance 20 hours after they merged with another
  17. [quote][00:55] <+Bacon[LE]> Our turn to return the favor this round[/quote] You're doing it wrong Bacon. I miss your old leadership. At least they knew how to fight a war on their own.
  18. Let me get this straight. 1. LE are attacking us for stuff CDT did last round? And this is their chance for payback? Ok. 2. Lonewolfe has a bunch of flag chasers that we raided a few days ago. We peaced out. HE then proceeded to threaten our alliance with destruction TWICE. We told him to stop. Ok. Good job folks. Neither of you know how to fight on your own, so you get help from others. At least the blitz was weak. And to LE, you guys fell for it. I know you don't care about flags, but the entire reason for this is to allow Lonewolf to secure a flag through his aa Betamax, and through others. I guess you guys are just sick of losing wars :/
  19. [s]I want a 20$ donation for my TE nation. Will pay you 15 million and 250 tech in SE. Message me here if interested: http://www.cybernati...ation_ID=378789[/s] all taken.
  20. I want a 20$ donation for my TE nation. Will pay you 18 million in SE. Message me here if interested: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=378789
  21. Plenty of flag chasing alliances you can join. Of course, you're not guaranteed to avoid war since it's TE and everybody fights.
  22. o/ war Have fun and use those nukes
  23. [quote name='infinite citadel' date='16 June 2010 - 11:23 PM' timestamp='1276748608' post='2340301'] Had to hit someone Also LE didn't even know I was hitting any CDT members so no blame to them, this was me and only me. Edit: Not to mention I wasn't even LE since the 3rd day of this round [/quote] Even though you were in LE all of last round yet went after us this round. Good to know how you feel about us. And cowardly of you to target me and two others with nukes even though we have been fighting for a week, and in nuclear anarchy. Coward. Anyway, good match all around. Wouldn't expect anything less against one of the best military alliances in the game.
  24. Haha, looks like one of your former members is deciding to help out with a few nukes. http://tournament.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?search=1000134&Extended=1 A shame since we were left pretty much undisturbed.
  25. CDT - 227,568 strength at the start of the war. Currently standing at 173,252. Lafayette Escadrille - at 209,343 strength at the start of the war. Currently standing at 140,951. CDT has lost 54,316 strength LE has lost 68,392. Both alliances now have an equal number of members (CDT has lost 3, likely ghosts). CDT started the war with 8 anarchies (from ghosts) They currently have 34 nations in anarchy. So about 26 as a result of this war. LE has 26 nations in anarchy. They started the war out with either 1 or 0, I cannot remember. CDT started the war out with 16 more nukes, and currently still has 16 more nukes. CDT started the war out with about 300 more aircraft, and currently have about 100 more aircraft. LE has 13 nations left with an ns above 3,000. CDT has 29 nations left above 3,000 ns.
×
×
  • Create New...