Jump to content

Martijn

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Martijnland
  • Alliance Name
    FOK
  • Resource 1
    Gems
  • Resource 2
    Water

Martijn's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. [quote name='Bob Janova' date='25 February 2010 - 06:20 PM' timestamp='1267118667' post='2203168'] The issue here is that FOK has declared (through their choice or MK's) on an old friend and that shows a lack of class. [/quote] If TOP hadn't attacked MK, FOK and TOP would now not be fighting. It's as simple as that. Of course FOK did not want to go to war with TOP and as Divi and many others have already gone out of their way to explain, FOK is not happy with this situation at all. But having said that, treaty obglitations are not to be taken lightly. FOK's signature on an MDP means something and that is why we are now meeting on the battlefield. If that isn't classy, I don't know what is.
  2. [quote name='Bob Janova' date='25 February 2010 - 02:31 PM' timestamp='1267104920' post='2202958'] ... except that it states three times in their DoW that they are not. [/quote] It is completely irrelevant if TOP's attack is a seperate war or part of something larger. It changes nothing to the fact we have a treaty with MK and not with TOP, making the defence of MK against TOP the only possible option.
  3. [quote name='Mussolandia' date='24 February 2010 - 07:49 AM' timestamp='1266990807' post='2200686'] There is definitely a pattern. It is the second time FOK declares on a former ally a short while after the end of obligations. [/quote] Funny how you leave out that each time, the former ally aggressively attacked one of FOK's allies. If there is a pattern, it's a pattern of FOK honoring their treaties, even when the choice is a tough one.
  4. Ironically, this is exactly what happened to NPO. Their loss is not caused by their lack of military readiness, but because too few alliances were willing to defend them.
  5. Congrats to Fark and GPA for taking over NPO.
  6. NPO just dropped below GPA in score too
  7. NPO is only 4 points from being desanctioned. Even though loss of score is indeed declining, Pacifica still loses about a quarter of a point and a handful of members on a daily basis, while all other alliances are gaining score. Even by the most positive forecast, NPO will be without a sanction within a month and probably a lot sooner than that. That's not propaganda, that's just facts.
  8. Exactly. CN is a slow game. You shouldn't be suprised or annoyed that alliances retaliate for something months or even years later. That's what you get with a game at a pace of only one tick a day.
  9. I'll remind you to just "get over it" when Pacifica takes their revenge on Karma in two years.
  10. It was posted here by your own leader.
  11. I would accept peace with NPO if every single member of Pacifica would post an apology on YouTube. I would require no further payments or anything. Just one topic with 707 704 YouTube links in which every single member would sit in front of their webcam to say he/she is sorry for all this.
  12. I voted for "Western Europe". I think it's the most accurate description of where the Netherlands is located, taking the options of the poll into account. In RISK, it's in Northern Europe though
  13. As far as I know, these alliance still have active DoWs on NPO: VE, Athens, GR, R&R, RoK, MOON, INT, Orion, DiCE, Vanguard, Avalanche, GOD, GUN, FOK, Sparta, UCR, =LOST=, Fly.
  14. Nice to see the gap between NPO and GPA closing. Their positions should be switched by the end of the weekend.
  15. Intersting to see so much monarchies. This is never the optimal government for my nation: my nations is capitalist when I pay bills or buy infra, when I collect taxes my nation's a democracy and when at war, my nation uses communism. And what's this religion thing you speak of?
×
×
  • Create New...