Jump to content

Gurney Halleck

Members
  • Posts

    783
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Gurney Halleck

  • Birthday June 22

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://ordoparadox.com/top/index.php?showforum=13
  • Yahoo
    Don't do Yahoo, either.
  • ICQ
    666
  • MSN
    Nope.
  • AIM
    What is AIM?

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Chess, American college football, politics, healthcare, destruction of Inner Shermania.
  • Location
    Faubourg Marigny
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Arrakis
  • Resource 1
    Lumber
  • Resource 2
    Lead

Gurney Halleck's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. Every thread should be about Tecumseh, the villainous swine at UPN. From From Bob's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I fling my last nuke at thee (if I had nukes). Ye damned Bucknut!
  2. Every thread should be about Tecumseh, the villainous swine at UPN! From Bob's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I fling my last nuke at thee (if I had nukes). Ye damned Bucknut!
  3. [quote name='Rocky Horror' date='03 March 2010 - 06:32 PM' timestamp='1267662961' post='2213125'] Still, if it burns down a warchest a few hundred k quicker a week, it's a pain. Not to mention, buying infra and military would be more expensive. [/quote] Well, it would have an economic effect (you would lose some happiness), but picking up your trades on none would still give you the military discounts.
  4. [quote name='Rocky Horror' date='03 March 2010 - 06:05 PM' timestamp='1267661358' post='2213103'] Not sure what bills are like with no trades, not so good I guess. [/quote] You pick up trades as soon as you're sanctioned (unless you've voted recently). You just go to "none" and pick up trades there. Besides, when your infra is 1000 or less, it's pretty cheap regardless.
  5. Meh, sanctioning those in a never ending war just forces them to go to none, or do the secret trades for a bit. It's not like your collections amount to anything in nuclear anarchy anyway.
  6. [quote name='Quiziotle' date='02 March 2010 - 05:29 PM' timestamp='1267572795' post='2211885'] TOP has impressed me the most this war. I figured they would do somewhat well, given that they have (perhaps "had" would be better word choice) an extremely powerful upper-tier, but even still, they surpassed my expectations. [/quote] Thanks. We like you guys, too, as opponents. We should totally war more often.
  7. [quote name='Franz Ferdinand' date='02 March 2010 - 04:07 PM' timestamp='1267567880' post='2211739'] So... does this mean we can Tech Raid him with no repercussions at all? [/quote] Oh, I can guarantee that there would be repercussions.
  8. Well, it is certainly within their rights to delay working on peace.
  9. I'm torn. I love to see people with the courage of their convictions and who would rather leap off a cliff than to go back on their word, but on the other hand I hate to see Ivan step down. Nonetheless, congrats to the Sith on peace (even if peace is a lie).
  10. War is hell. Fok had to make a tough decision here. I can relate. o/ Fok
  11. [quote name='Roadie' date='24 February 2010 - 01:23 AM' timestamp='1266996431' post='2201067'] It's almost as if they [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=79847&st=0&p=2152238&#entry2152238"]said[/url] they did, but didn't mean it. 10.We are committed to ending this war as rapidly as possible, preferably by a white peace agreement for everyone engaged including but not limited to TOP, IRON, C&G and SF and all their related friends and well wishers. I can not however stand idly by whilst my comrades are in deep trouble on our behalf.[/i] [/quote] Whose words are these? (edit: nevermind. Found the link; it's late, sue me)
  12. Fok did what they felt they had to. Tough positions are made in war. As far as MK bringing in #22, totally understandable. War isn't fought by queensberry rules. They aren't looking to make this a 'fair fight.' That would be silly. Besides, neither side can peace out yet. We still have nukes left.
  13. TOP has long been an alliance of bloodthirsty and incorrigible warmongers, hellbent on aggressively attacking alliances who posed no real threat. They are known for recklessly throwing their nations to the wind to attack without even the slightest provocation. It is their brand and trademark. Why, if you grant them peace now, they'll just continue back down this path as they have for time immemorial. Kidding aside... As far as peace terms go, we have to be presented terms before we can turn them down or (admin forbid) accept. I will say this about reps: We (TOP) have accepted them before. They aren't all they're cracked up to be. <in before "sure, you say that NOW!">
  14. OMFG, to the man, are great folks. Glad you've got some peace and prosperity coming your way. [i](tell Nobby I said hello) [/i]
×
×
  • Create New...