Jump to content

Darth Volcaniz

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Darth Volcaniz

  1. [quote name='Tornado' date='09 March 2010 - 10:35 AM' timestamp='1268160033' post='2219472'] I don't know why but I picture this as Wadoflint making this announcement: [img]http://photos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs448.snc3/25682_377342770638_354862355638_5359968_7582046_n.jpg[/img] [/quote] LOL
  2. Only the weak are tainted by power. o/ NSO and the dark lord
  3. lol you obviously dont comprehend the situation:: its simple, 1 person says that IAA is not 3 years old, another says it is. the facts: 1) IAA disbanded 2) the core memebers (as well as, in theory, other members) maintained communication and association outside of cybernations 3) after 11.5 months of being disbanded, the leadership behind the disbanded IAA decides to get back together and after a few months declare the 3 year anniversary of its original inception 4) " If anyone had a right to reform IAA, it was me. Please, learn to read up on history before deciding to just go around unsuccessfully debating us in every thread we make." - chimaera Reforming an alliance is not the same as revitalizing an alliance. Reforming IAA is what you did, you took a dead and disbanded alliance's membership and brought them all back into a new alliance with the same alliance name. Revitalizing an alliance is taking an alliance which had, in the past, a large membership (such as the old IAA) and for whatever reason the bulk of the membership left and coming to it and getting all its old, or new, members and replenishing its deminished ranks. Unless you can show me that there were members of the old IAA that kept the IAA flag and aa after the disband, then i CAN NOT believe that the 2 IAAs are 1 and the same. P.S. Please do not misconstrue my opinions as hostility, i have the utmost respect and love for my imperial counterparts
  4. so i can blow you up, rebuild you(with a different head) and and say your the exact same thing? WOW, i never realized the simplicity of the logic
  5. my request for an seniority of 650 days or more was a response to: I should have mentioned that. ..
  6. Im NOT questioning your sovereignty, nor your right to rule. As i said earlier, community does not equal the alliance. 650 days is not 3 years, true, but it is also far longer than the 14ish months that IAA was disbanded. . . IF someone were to have that seniority, then it can be justified that you are the same alliance, reborn from a single cell, much like a star fish. HOWEVER, if you do not have this seniority, then i am lead to believe that you are a clone of the old, ALMOST identical, but still different (think the dinosaurs of "Jurrasic Park") Also, let me put it a different way: the egypt we know today is not the egypt we knew some 5000 years ago. . . when the slaves of egypt got up and left into exile, egypt effectively got "disbanded" and had to "reform" to survive. ALSO, i was thinking, if you are the SAME alliance you were before, why hasn't NPO resumed hostilities? as far as i know, know peace treaty was ever signed between IAA and NPO. . NPO disbanded to prevent this, and now has reformed? i see a little scape-goat here. ..
  7. This forum has become a pissing contest of who and what were the causes of the original IAA. BUT the forum is really about the IAA being 3 years old. NOW, if the IAA wants to prove that it is the same alliance, and thus proving this thread's legitimacy, I request the link to 1 nation that has an alliance seniority to IAA with 650 days, or more
  8. I have read all the pages read all the PoVs, and i would like to point something out. The OP IMPLIES that the old IAA and the new IAA are 1 and the same, omitting the 14 months of disbandment. 14 months of disbandment, thats over a year that IAA DID NOT exist. also, while the new IAA may have been founded my much of the same members, the very fact that it's charter was not written by the same exact people, that it does not have the same exact leaders, and the same exact charter, it can not be called the same exact IAA, and therefor is not 3 years old. The core and essence of the old IAA may have survived, and may have comeback together under the same name with the same values and ideas, may even have the same principles, but it IS NOT the same. It is similar, almost identical, but it can never be the same. NOW, had 1 or 2 original members maintained and stayed in IAA, and been low-profile and rebuild the IAA, bringing in all the old members, THEN i could justify that its the same alliance. but 14 months of non-existence makes this new IAA, a new aa, and not an old aa. You can continue to argue that since its the same community its the same alliance, but the sad, un-sugared, truth is:: same community =/= same alliance
  9. the only apology i will ever issue to a jedi is as follows: "Im sorry you were allowed to live. Let me rectify that"
  10. WHO STEELS my plans for an imperial-themed wedding? i will slaughter them with my lightsabers
  11. an apology for Order 66 WILL NEVER HAPPEN. . . i think its safe to say that, despite our differences and opinionated stances, this is something NSO and IAA can agree on
  12. was using the cannon fodder/cavalry as a metaphor, but i guess the meaning was lost. .. oh well
  13. Umm, I beg to differ. IAA = cannon fodder NSO= elite cavalry
  14. the rule of 2 was established by Darth Bane. It dicated that there would only be 2 sith, a master to embody power, and an apprentice to crave it.
×
×
  • Create New...