Jump to content

Gondor

Members
  • Posts

    311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gondor

  1. The changes in the first solution sound good, not so much the next 2. I love being able to attack anyone, anywhere, and anytime. Not be going "well, is he in my attack range...?"

    The main problem is, that your solution won't really fix the problem. For example, you say too many people are on black. Why? because RE is on black! It has 480 nations in that alliance alone. So whichever sphere the major 3 (RE, Frostbite, MHA) choose, will have a higher number of nations than the rest of the spheres.

  2. As in all games, I

    seriously though, it is all about having fun. If you have fun always being beat up in a 6v1 war, have at it. All you have to do is wear a none AA. If you enjoy diplomacy, found an alliance and work with other alliances trying to get treaties. If you have fun just growing your nation, join a large AA and just collect infra. If you have more fun working with others to achieve a common goal, join a random midsized alliance and get involved. You'll meet new people, possibly some from the other side of the polarized fence of SE.

    In any case, it takes all of these types of people to make the world go round. How boring would it be if everyone was always in anarchy and didn't have enough money to actually do anything? How boring would it be if everyone formed their own alliance and there was this massive treaty web that prevented any action from ever happening? How boring would it be if everyone just sat there and grew their nation, not interacting with anyone else? How boring would it be if everyone were in the same alliance?

    The thing that makes TE special is that one can have a lulz war here and not ruin what someone has worked on for years. Everyone starts off on an even footing every round so no one can complain about never catching up to the epically huge nations in SE.

    This is a game, and everyone knows it is a game. There is nothing immoral about using the the built in war feature. Is it immoral to make another player go bankrupt when they land on you in monopoly just because they have little money? Is it immoral to eliminate another player in Risk just because they are smaller? What's immoral is cheating, just like in any other game. And the mods crack down on that very well IMO.

    My only point, is be open minded. There are a variety of ways to play this game to reach the end goal, which varies from person to person. So quit whining, and play the game!

    If you read nothing else in this thread, read this post. It sums up TE better than almost every other post I've read about TE.

  3. I think of TE has simply a much harsher version of SE. Where ZIs are more common and the reasons for war more shallow. Throw out the emphasis on diplomacy from SE. I DON"t think that it should be just mindless war. I tried that last round there was no fun in it. Rogues, Raids and ZIs are acceptable rather than being frowned upon heavily, like in SE.

  4. Why should SDF get involved? That's the question I asked myself.. I started it, not SDF. SDF is still rebuilding after a devastating war against two huge alliances. I won't force them to fight a war because of my mistakes.

    A leader is responsible for his actions. You are the No. 1 in SDF regardless of what is thought of it. Being a Rogue is a lot different from being a leader of SDF. Learn that soon.

×
×
  • Create New...