Jump to content

In Tyler We Trust

Members
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by In Tyler We Trust

  1. Nice issue, Sir Paul. These burgers are the only thing keeping me going against the collective forces of Karma You crave attention so badly don't you
  2. Its like a Bird/Bird on blue back ground. I can't quite wrap my head around it. Maybe its a good thing I can't bend my skull though
  3. Awesome Have fun Sileath and BTA lol. (spelling )
  4. Sorry if you think the fact that everyone in NPO thinks that that term is !@#$%^&* means that we're brainwashed drones. I'd invite you to read everything I've written since joining to show you how wrong you are at least in my case, but I'm afraid diplomats can't see those things. I'd love to go on a treasure hunt and be proven wrong that you don't want to make 90% of our nations switch to war mode for two weeks, but I'd rather not spend hours digging through 200+ page topics. Unless the term that requires 90% of all nations to be in war mode for two weeks changes my point will remain the same.
  5. Maybe, as it stands we've gained score today too
  6. Two days in a row with gains for NPO
  7. You realize that the only reason we are still at war is because we have 230+ nations "keeping their strength instead of throwing it away to make a point," as you put it. Your post completely encompasses the attitude of Karma in that in the long run they do want to make us weaker by forcing those nations to throw away their strength. We aren't interested in making a comeback an uncertainty, Karma is by removing nearly all of our nations from peace mode and blasting them for 2 weeks once we get 90% of them into war mode. Sounds to me like you would refuse the terms we were given as well if you knew what was going on...
  8. Those needed to stay in the pan a little longer.
  9. I don't think we're complaining (at least I'm not), I think declining would be a better word
  10. It still doesn't mean we should accept whatever terms are given to us and I don't know anyone who has said that they would accept those terms (granted I haven't bothered to read through this thread ).
  11. Brain washed =/= loyal or honourable Just saying B)
  12. I'd accept it under some circumstances. If there is a pre-existing relationship between nation rulers and one just says, "hey, want to join my alliance?" I have no problem with it. Mass messaging nations from other alliances with recruitment messages, though, I am not a fan of.
  13. I appreciate your concerns CoalchestersKing, but the NPO leaders are doing everything they can to achieve peace terms, the ones presented were just not right for us. We don't need to pressure our leaders because they are already working extremely hard for us and we are very thankful and fortunate for everything that they are doing to end this war with what they have been given.
  14. He died less than a week ago. If you used any Billy Mays image at least make it respectful rather than sarcastic.
  15. I really like the IAA flag out of those ones.
×
×
  • Create New...