Naomh Fionnbharr

I surrender to TPF.

Ah, just like old times, 4 on 1 It is a privilege and a honour to be fighting TPF in this war. We are not surprised you have entered, but we do feel your timing is a little late we really did expect you sooner. We make no other promises then this, we will see to it many TPF nations have to re-rise out of the ashes and become a new after this war is over. Good luck TPF and we'll keep this fight clean I look forward to battles ahead with your nations. [img] http://www.bullz-eye.com/mguide/review_images/1948-2004/braveheart/braveheart_1.jpg[/img] [color="#0000FF"] [size="5"]YOU CAN TAKE OUR NATIONS, BUT YOU'LL NEVER TAKE OUR FREEDOM!!!![/size][/color]

The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round

Awwww, your so sweet! We love you too

[quote name='Balder' date='05 February 2010 - 12:02 PM' timestamp='1265392969' post='2161690'] That makes it better? So if I announce that I won't be joining the losing side of the war, despite all of my treaties being there, and then bandwagon... that's okay? [/quote] I'll now give you the official response from the WAPA membership. "Sticks and stones may break our bones, but names will never hurt us" I suggest you look at our history, we've been called many things, many alliances have attacked us and attempted to destroy us. They all failed miserably. No alliance and no coalition, no amount of bad and false statements and propaganda has destroyed us in the past. But if you feel you can, go ahead. Now have a nice day

[quote name='The AUT' date='05 February 2010 - 11:56 AM' timestamp='1265392578' post='2161679'] You are under a term which asks you to declare in defense of your allies. Your allies were NEW. Instead, you decided to exercise an oAP with 1TF and declare on NATO instead. The least you could have done was declare neutrality. I don't think the NEW treaty will last long, and for good reason. If Karma really exists, I'll enjoy your destruction soon enough. [/quote] I can see you have trouble reading, maybe this will help you. [size="7"] WAPA MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT IT WILL NOT HELP/AID ANY ALLIANCE ON THE IRON/TOP SIDE OF THE WAR, BY THAT IT MEANS TREATY PARTNERS AS WELL. WE MADE IT CLEAR DAYS AFTER THE CONFLICT BEGUN AND DAYS BEFORE WE WENT TO WAR OR NEW HAD ASKED US FOR HELP.[/size]

[quote name='Vespassianus' date='05 February 2010 - 11:47 AM' timestamp='1265392068' post='2161668'] You broke a treaty, that's so simple. If treaties worth !@#$ for you why do you sign it? You fleed from danger and left an ally. [/quote] We did not break our treaty with NEW. If we had, NEW would posted on our forums that they are cancelling the treaty. If we had felt we were breaking the treaty we would have cancelled it. I suggest you give up, your firing a gun with no bullets and are making yourself out to be complete fool.

[quote name='merdesa' date='05 February 2010 - 11:19 AM' timestamp='1265390356' post='2161633'] So you consulted them about not being able to aid them because of your stance, this being prior to your decision to even consider going to war. Did you consult them about your consideration of going to war? --Or the decision to go to war? Maybe you thought NEW would just see the DoW and that'd be that? If this is the case then it should be obvious why disappoint would arise from this. [/quote] Maybe you should pay more attention to the wording of our policy to the war that was released days prior to us entering the conflict. We stated that we would not aid any alliance fighting on the IRON/TOP side "directly or indirectly" That includes NEW. NEW then asked the impossible of us, that was to break our policy and enter the war on their side. This of course we rejected and we maintained our policy of not aiding the IRON/TOP side. We did not consult NEW on our decision to go to war along side 1TF against NATO for a number of reasons of which I cannot state as I do not have that authority.

[quote name='K1L1On1Mr4' date='05 February 2010 - 04:22 AM' timestamp='1265365350' post='2161285'] I;m sorry for wall of texts I'm interested on bolded statement And i'm notbackstabbed by WAPA, just dissapointed, days ago WAPA wanted to activate oA to engage Athens. Guess our luck was bad [/quote] The answer to your questions is this, "we would prefer" we did not say we would not use oA's in this conflict or that we would. Our preferance was not to use one, however our Firm made a decision on behalf of the alliance and the membership have answered it by rallying to war under the Satire. I answered NEW's request for aid in this conflict myself as I am the DMoFA. [quote]15[14:45] <Finner[DMoFA|WAPA]> Officially WAPA will not support the IRON/TOP side of this war. This is regrettable as it leaves NEW in a hard position. I regret to say that WAPA will be unable to aid or assist NEW by deploying its forces or aid through monies. 15[14:45] <Finner[DMoFA|WAPA]> I am truly sorry[/quote] NEW accepted this response without any official compliant on our forums or through the IRC channels. At least no record is written that I am personally aware of. WAPA did not "hang NEW out to dry" or "back stab" them, our stance was made very clear, prior to the Government considering going to war. Many of our members as well as myself are extremely fond of NEW and regret the circumstances to which we have found ourselves on opposite sides of bored. However it is my hope that this does not damage our relations for the future. God speed NEW I salute you.

I really do apologise but a different offer for a complete trade circle has come up. I am very very sorry to mess you around - best of luck replacing me. THanks

Put me down for Alu/lumber please. Currently on white but not fussed on what colour although would prefer not yellow or pink. Can you PM in game though please as not too active on here. Thanks

WAPA YA BASS!

Grand job, great to see this!

You leave our Andymac alone >.<

*sighs* I’m a raider and I know the majority of people on Cybernation’s sees my kind as nothing but Pirates, personally I like been a Pirate. I like the idea of coming out of the night and ripping another Nations heart out; its fun and gives me kicks. But I also know how to raid properly. The Raider who raided you did it wrong, your supposed to gather intelligence and see how much the Target has. What you’ve done is an extreme blunder. I understand what your doing, but you and the rest who are with you really should have thought about this a lot more. I’ll explain why, 1. Raiders across Cybernation’s had not heard of this "Silent Majority" but now they do. 2. You have proven you and your Organization are well funded; this has now painted yourself and your Comrades as a very large Targets. 3. Raiders now will increase funds for raiding operations. 4. Raiders will use Spies more often now to see money reserves. 5. If they see a Nation with that amount of money they will suspect them to be a member of "The Silent Majority". 6. The Raider will call in back up and Dog Pile the Target. 7. You loose everything, cash, tech and most importantly now, land. I suppose you didn’t take any of that into account, I’ve made it a long habit to only raid on my own when I know that if it turns into a war I can win. Otherwise I Raid in a group of 3 and have friends ready to support me and my raiding party with a cash flow. If you’d kept Silent like your organizations name says this trap you had could have been very successful in the future. But instead you’ve blown it sky high. I hope I find a member(s) of yours, I’ll be sure to take everything he/she has, right down to the penny’s in its piggy bank. But good luck to you and your Comrades.