Jump to content

Azural

Members
  • Posts

    149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Azural

  1. I liked you guys. Hope those of you who joined IAA will enjoy it there.
  2. So this only affects those who attack a raider who is in an alliance? Also great job on taking our name.
  3. [quote name='Merrie Melodies' date='04 April 2010 - 07:01 PM' timestamp='1270425650' post='2248048'] There are many reason so many nations suffer infant death syndrome, tech raiding is just one of them. [/quote] So since it's only one of the causes to the problem we shouldn't do what we can to help prevent it?
  4. [quote name='Mr Damsky' date='04 April 2010 - 04:37 PM' timestamp='1270417044' post='2247867'] The only person who can tech raid someone of fifty nation strength is another nation of fifty nation strength. Plus international law dictates a nation receives one day to train its soldiers before it may be attacked. That's plenty of time to mull over your options for an alliance. [/quote] Because one day is just so much time.
  5. [quote name='Mr Damsky' date='04 April 2010 - 04:27 PM' timestamp='1270416415' post='2247858'] And for the love of admin, don't tell me new nations don't know about alliances. [/quote] Sure, they get flooded with recruitment messages. But why should they have to choose to join one of those alliances quickly if they don't wish to be destroyed?
  6. [quote name='Chief Savage Man' date='04 April 2010 - 03:56 PM' timestamp='1270414586' post='2247815'] Everybody wins. [/quote] Not those who decide to quit because they were repeatedly attacked.
  7. [quote name='memoryproblems' date='04 April 2010 - 02:57 AM' timestamp='1270367803' post='2247379'] As for the larger picture, it seems strange to me, how far are you going to take it? Are you going to try to stand up against alliance raiding policies, or are you just going to bully the unaligned who raid other unaligned? [/quote] That depends on which alliance is helping the particular victim and how they choose to enact the article quoted below. [quote]ARTICLE III: Raid Victim Assistance *An optional agreement to come to the aid of non-aligned nations that are the victims of piracy through an application of optional diplomatic, economic or military force commensurate with the strength of the offending pirate and according to the attackers alliance status or lack thereof.[/quote] That could mean contacting an alliance who's member is raiding a unaligned nation to try to find a diplomatic solution (say if the nation who attacks refuses to peace out). It also means that military force may be used at the signatory's discretion if they so choose. Though I find it unlikely that that particular option will be used against any alliance. It's much more likely to affect those unaligned nations who refuse to stop attacking another. I'm not sure how you figure we'll be bullying anyone.
  8. I doubt any of us were worried about you attacking in the first place.
  9. TJO stands for The Jedi Order. The Jedi Council is simply our collective body of Jedi Masters.
  10. [quote name='DogeWilliam' date='31 January 2010 - 02:27 AM' timestamp='1264926471' post='2147168'] Umm, no. You probably wouldn't see a single TOP post if they had given no reason. But, Doitzel is quite the attention grubber. So he has to bring out some dirty laundry that he has no claim to so that there will be multiple pages to this thread. [/quote] And here I was thinking we all agreed on the reason to go to war. Who knew this was all about our Grandmaster wanting to be an attention whore?
  11. [quote name='Sal Paradise' date='31 January 2010 - 02:14 AM' timestamp='1264925676' post='2147157'] If TOP no longer wishes to continue this conflict, perhaps they can relinquish their claim to our members' rights to be cocky. You'll have to take this up with our government, of course. [/quote] I don't see any reason to start peace talks yet.
  12. [quote name='Timberland' date='31 January 2010 - 01:34 AM' timestamp='1264923282' post='2147089'] I was just stating that Doitzel was wrong [/quote] Somebody stated it earlier. It just so happens that all of us either didn't see the announcement of the upgrade or couldn't remember it. There are a lot of treaties to keep up with.
  13. TJO declared on TOP and TSO, not on TORN and TSO.
  14. [quote name='Methrage' date='31 January 2010 - 01:05 AM' timestamp='1264921555' post='2147021'] Your declaring on them because of an old log with Saber stating an opinion? Seeing as you seem to be unrelated to TOP's other wars it will be interesting to see if this brings in some of TOP's allies, considering this is clearly offensive and bandwaggoning onto a war that doesn't involve you. [/quote] I'm sorry, why did TOP declare on C&G again?
  15. [quote name='Metal Shards' date='31 January 2010 - 12:54 AM' timestamp='1264920886' post='2146987'] Welcome to the battlefield. [/quote] [url=http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?searchstring=Declaring_Alliance,Receiving_Alliance&search=The%20Jedi%20Order&anyallexact=exact]It's kind of small right now. [/url]
  16. [quote name='avernite' date='31 January 2010 - 12:02 AM' timestamp='1264917775' post='2146885'] Though, it should be noted, Lemeard really has nothing to fear in TJO. We aren't gunning for ski11585 these days, either. Unless of course he goes on about his true paradoxian thing. [/quote] We Jedi have nothing to fear.
  17. So the Force wills it. So it shall be. Snce everyone who's in my range is in hiding, it would be nice if some of you could come out and [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=321379]say hi[/url].
  18. I like the theme. The new banner on the other hand...
  19. The Jedi Order does not endorse this message.
  20. Thought we were on here already. The Jedi Order (TJO) - #TJO
  21. Some of them actually learn the error of their ways. It's good to see a decent outcome.
×
×
  • Create New...