EgoFreaky

You compared this to 2 members that left Int for R&R. So either you feel they are similar incidents which I don't appreciate, or you don't in which case your post was totally unrelated to the topic and R&R was just used to detract from your mess which I also don't appreciate. Nor do I appreciate R&R members being compared to spies. Your alliance already dragged our name through the mud once based on lies, slander, faulty comparisons and half truths. I would appreciate it if you didn't involve us in your latest drama in any way. Ktnxbye.

Only we didn't send them, they didn't come from R&R but left Int to go to R&R, and they didn't spy.. for the rest exactly the same.. You might want to watch out who you compare your spying actions with.. One might get offended. Also if we send a dozen spies to screw over int, they probably can't do half the job you fuck ups do on your own

If you can't protect your PoW's you shouldn't be taking surrenders. As for how anyone can protect their PoW camp, personally I usually just say that people attacking the PoW AA will be kept at war after peace has been reached. But for that you have to be in a position where you can make good on such threats and kaskus.. isn't.

o/ NATO!

Reading over the MDAP discussion I wonder, why are treaties even written? Apparently we should just have posted 'we signed an MDAP' and let the world fill in the blanks.. However we didn't so I guess we're stuck with the treaty we have (which by the way isn't a full fledged MDAP because it's basically set up like SF was (So this isn't the first bloc like this). Which is a MDoAP bloc which needs a majority vote to make it a full MDAP. Anyway some points to touch on: 1. We haven't been signing treaties all over the place and our FA is pretty unified. We did all however have treaties before the bloc and yes some of those don't match exactly. 2. How can people say 'You should be your own master' and 'You should have alligned with one side' in the same post. We are our own masters and therefor don't care about what the sides of the day are. 3. Us isn't divided in the least, we all agree on the actions made, NATO and TIO are defending an ally that has been attacked and R&R supports them fully in this. We also agreed not to enter this conflict on an optional clause and both Fark and NPO were told this when they asked about it. 4. Yes we had an ally on the other side in Fark, they haven't been attacked so thats not an issue here. Really its all not to hard to understand when you can read. ps. stealthy stop making such posts or i'll really make you emperor.. and we both know you don't want to be in charge :P

Did you hit your head or something? 1. We only have one ally on the other side so far 2. We don't hate NPO, we have had friendly relations with them for years now. 3. We're not defending NPO. 4. We're not even fighting yet so how are we a meatshield? 5. Yes there are alliances we dislike on the NSO side of the war, we also have alliances we dislike on the other side, must admit kinda good to see them bash each others heads in. Would we rather not have our bloc fight our former bloc? Obviously, but life is all about disappointments and so far the ones we've had are rather limited.

And i doubt a bug /wants/ to say *squash* but it's what happens when a size 14 jackboot steps on it.

Awesome way to select a government. Incoming fail in 3...2... oh wait its already here.

You tell someone you dislike their actions and suddenly they feel all important. Berbers is right though, HB will /never/ play a part in any decision R&R makes.

Sad to see this but hard to avoid. Good luck NATO/TIO o/ Us

What can I say, I like ruining your fun :P

No thats COMECON, the former alliance R&R forced to change its name.

Unless they changed the XX treaty since we left they have a sphere clause in it. So there really wasn't a need for them to wait.

Lol @ NSO Do you guys really believe your own story at this point?

o/ Fark, have fun out there :)

Would the person that took a dump in our topic please clean up after themselves.

Because an announcement that we like each other and might act on each others behalf would be so much better than an announcement that we might act on each others behalf right?

Been a long time, but it feels good to re-sign with you guys :) o/ ODN

We picked our targets, when they were fair game, that they decided to hop onto other AA's is their business. Even if they legitimately joined another alliance let's say DBDC in this case, they're on our lists. Any alliance out there knows things like this can be resolved with a civil conversation in which will be made clear why someone is on a target list and how they can get removed from said list. Cuba however chose to use threats. We didn't respond to being threatened by DH and their allies and anyone that thinks we will be threatened by DBDC is delusional. DBDC can either start up a civil dialogue to resolve the issues, or act on their threats. Either way is fine by me.

That you kidnapped Garion proves you're insane so good post US

Awww, shucks, well I still kinda like you as well (Actually still like several people in Int.. but what's CN without a decent grudge). That said, I have to dispute your claim because i'm pretty sure this was only my 3rd OWF post about it.. once during the cancellation, once during the war and once in this topic. I really don't spend that much time thinking about it. I just wanted to wake up, whoever it was I replied to, from his dream.

Aww, don't be like that, there were times you loved incredibly dumb shit and were its main representative. LOL Though I can applaud Int for this move and think they made the right decision for themselves.. thats not gonna happen. A knife in the back doesn't disappear just because the one telling them to put it there has slightly less influence over them now. Even after the LEO disbandment, we tried to uphold its spirit the best we could, so did FOK until their end even though we weren't a bloc anymore and even when it was politically inconvenient.. but Int used this against us and instead of just saying straight out that our treaty was inconvenient they lied and twisted intentions trying to justify their own actions. The international we once loved is dead to us and frankly we don't really care about this shell thats left.

Good to finally see this happen, congrats to both parties :)

Good to see that theres a neutral alliance out there not afraid to stand up for their beliefs. You just became my favorite neutral alliance :) Good luck on the battlefield.

sigh... another 10 minutes of my life i will never get back..