Jump to content

mattski133

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,252

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mattski133

  1. mattski133
    Kashmir has no treaties. All things are optional, including attack, defense, or neutrality. It really is as simple as, would Kashmir defend us? In any odds? Will we defend them, regardless of the odds? We've considered it kind of a political experiment, and as in any experiment sometimes the results are not what you'd expect. Things change over time, as anyone who's spent time here understands.
  2. mattski133
    NSO finds themselves torn between us and their good friends on the other side. we can hardly expect them to make a choice.
  3. mattski133
    We got to witness our continual efforts against rogue antagonists eventually leading to those people running to daddy for help. If anyone thinks Hardin's group, SDitS, or you were not specifically targeting us hoping to get a response they are deluded as the evidence is obvious and readily available. Saying we failed diplomatically because we retaliated against someone for attacking us when our diplomats were met with "roll kashmir" is amusing (still waiting on that mask). Oh ok, we're just gonna go be diplomatic with Non Grata, this should be effective. They're dicks to their own allies, I know, having been one at one point. I don't think anyone over here is shocked at any of this. Rogue groups have been standard at Kashmir for a long time, but this time they happened to be supported by Non Grata. Christ you're weird.
  4. mattski133
    bravo to our buddies for calling it like they see it.
  5. mattski133
    i think everyone is already aware that you guys just wanted a shot at us. i mean, we're at war and it doesn't seem like it'll be over soon, so I'm glad it only took 5 pages to get to this point. not sure why you involved polar though.
  6. mattski133
    my god are we going to have to hear methrage cheering every alliance you're gonna have to bring into this now
  7. mattski133
    Jack Layton (a nation) attacked Limitless Nexus. Limitless Nexus then immediately declared war on Kashmir. Sigrun declared war on Kashmir through some kind of oA I guess. Non Grata declared war on Kashmir chaining in on Sigrun's chain. NpO declared war on Kashmir by chaining in on NG's chain of Sigrun's chain. i think.
  8. mattski133
    this isn't about us, or you, guy.
  9. mattski133
    Day 3, grasping at straws has begun. Day 4, straws not cooperating.
  10. mattski133
    keep feeding the logs into the woodchipper!
  11. mattski133
    same comments, different war!
  12. mattski133
    the kashmir - methrage coalition feud can't end. what would we do with ourselves!
  13. mattski133
    relevant in two ways here.
  14. mattski133
    You'll have to understand our reluctance to play into our perceived enemies' hands. if we're gonna get rolled it might as well be on our terms. I enjoy getting this hostile response from IRON and Nongrata though, definitely makes it seem like it was he-said she-said and not a real threat.
  15. mattski133
    methrage posts a DOW on the forums, GATO meets us in private and we resolve things amicably. two different approaches, two different results!
  16. mattski133
    you are technically correct. ooooooooh is there cause for concern
  17. mattski133
    How dare you accuse us of such haberdashery, we who took the high road and led an alliance away from your warmongering and into the Kashphere, a haven of intellectualism and peace. How dare you sir.
  18. mattski133
    We will not stop until the last libertarian, laying beaten and blood soaked upon the field of battle, draws his last breath and farts his last utterance upon this world! We will not stop until no libertarian brick stands atop another and each grain of libertarian concrete has been painstakingly separated from another in our libertarian concrete crusher. You will know us by the four or five formidable fighters we possess, riding roughshod over your heathen ranks, whooping this way and whopping that way. Oh yes, you will know our fury, as we allegedly CONSIDER things like brokering PEACE and share INFORMATION with the INTENT of sending AID to someone we have no diplomatic ties to or communication with. You've been warned, libertarians; we are on the cusp of doing nothing! BEWARE.
  19. mattski133
    I have discovered exclusive imagery of Methrage creating another post. that is all. peace in our time.
  20. mattski133
    You guys fought very well also. I missed out on a lot of the last war so this was a nice shake up. I find myself strangely agreeing with what you've said here.
  21. mattski133
    You're just another in a long line of rogues in disagreement with us, and we will endure it as we have before. Clearly we disagree on how you left the alliance, and what point is there in arguing it? We're fighting it out finally and it seems to me that was the only outcome we could have ever had. So let's just enjoy dropping bombs on each other.
  22. mattski133
    I think it is fair to say we expected a better class of rogue from someone as well advertised as and by yourself. For a second there I thought you had actually built a coalition of sorts but it is much more fitting that are in fact just facing you, as there is probably no one that could tolerate your presence long enough to effect a crushing defeat. anyway, no amount of words is going to settle this, so let's just take it to the logical conclusion...when we are able.
  23. mattski133
    There seems to be a lot of emphasis on how fair we should be to these people. TIR attacked us without provocation, grossly down declaring, throwing together something from years ago to justify it, and after 5 days it seems they have thrown in the towel because a couple nations entered against them. Nevermind that Lord Caparo ghosted in to turn things to their favor in the first place. It is easy to say we are the larger alliance, but it is equally easy to say that your top 3 nations were much larger than ours, and that is, as time has shown, what really matters. Acting surprised that measures were taken to counter this reveals another of your circle's interesting political strategies; trying to make war a fair fight, and decrying those who don't buy in. War has never been fair and it favors those who prepare themselves in every way for it. I am still trying to figure out why Kaskus has not apologized to us or started any diplomatic discourse with regards to TIR, their "protectorate" so to speak who has gone rogue. If anything, the onus lies on them to make things right here as it would with any other responsible party. And yet I understand the only reason this has not escalated further into a complete slaughterhouse is because Kaskus is actually considering intervening should this go further. Not counting Kaskus member Lord Caparo, who has indeed entered already. You guys need to start putting something together that is serious if you want peace, not some ridiculous in game proposals.
  24. mattski133
    Man you can't just bushwhack someone out of the blue, with much larger nations than them, and then get upset when their bigger friends show up. I mean, you can, but then you can't laugh it off and say the war is over and expect that anyone cares. Here's what's gonna happen for a while: we are going to continue the war until you and sirwilliam come to some kind of agreement. And, uh, probably Hershey too, and if anyone else shows up, them too. Because you have an alliance, and you attacked an alliance, and you are experiencing the tip of the diplomatic dong right now.
  25. mattski133
    because you were the only nation to experience loss in that war. i'll relay that to those who burned for you.
×
×
  • Create New...