Jump to content

IYIyTh

Members
  • Content Count

    4,454
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About IYIyTh

  • Rank
    Straight Up

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://cn-mi6.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Caligula
  • Alliance Name
    Black Tea Matters Movement
  • Resource 1
    Oil
  • Resource 2
    Water
  • CN:TE Nation Name
    B
  • CN:TE Alliance Name
    Is there NO ONE ELSE?

Recent Profile Visitors

3,633 profile views
  1. You should do a report on when they were the only interesting thing to happen for the time they existed.
  2. Same, only I can't even be bothered to poke it with a stick anymore. Basically it's the same weirdo's who ruined the game occasionally making really odd posts on the OWF. The games age was kind of unique for its time. Bringing in folks from all over the world where the internet hadn't so co-depended everyone that the type of interaction we have now (Discord, social media, et al) was still possible for you to never know your opponents or friends. I don't think you'd find too many young folk interested in the current iteration of the game. The mechanics would need tweaked but as has
  3. The people responsible for the death of the game know who they are. The overall community was never truly at fault. A handful of shortsighted folks lacking imagination and too happy to just churn along with OOC friendships rather than understanding the rise and fall of all is what made this game great. Really just came back to wave to all of the folks I've seen posting their buhbyes.
  4. I keep checking back twice a year hoping to see some decent prose in declarations of war, but it seems it's about the same as it has been for nearly 5+ years. Still remember reading logs of the goons 1.0, \m/, continuum days, schattenman leaks... and being so utterly disappointed at the lack of bredth in alliance leaders much later. This game was most fun on the individual alliance level, as OOC friendships tainted most of the global politics and was not as nuanced nor easily surmountable as internal politics. Being in alliances with vibrant personalities and semi-democ
  5. Walshington is still an ass. hold the presses.
  6. i still have u beat with gophergate 2014
  7. There's nothing scary about a bully
  8. Now you just have to clarify what a multi is, because based on your current policy and its application I'm not finding a clear definition anywhere.
  9. They don't have the technology to support such an undertaking.
  10. Or if multiple nations disappeared overnight.
  11. I have no interest in investing thousands of hours of work in a nation simulator to attempt to break up what amounts to OOC circle jerking for the amusement of a handful of people. That card isn't going to work. It's not 2006 and I'm not 18 anymore with too much time on my hands. Folks have repeatedly gone out of their way to kill the game -- advocating for "change," (re: proposing that large nations become even more powerful,) that has lent its current shape -- a diminishing pool where most "new," nations fall into the wonderful "multi," rule. None of these nations have any impact on the ga
  12. Totally with you. The "leaders," of today -- if you can call them that -- are completely unoriginal.
  13. Operation Goliath to take back tech importation supremacy from Umbrella must be initiated.
×
×
  • Create New...