lamuella
-
Posts
17,586 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Blog Comments posted by lamuella
-
-
hardly worth the effort, really. As irritations go he's minor.
-
I don't want him to quit. I don't want him to stay. I don't want anything from him. I find him and the people who dislike him irritating in equal measures and would love to be able to mute all of them.
-
could you guys have this argument or whatever it is somewhere else?
-
I'm flattered.
-
Great post, good to read something interesting in the sea of boring crap. It's also enlightening to see a realistic take on what's going on, beyond all the slanted/biased arguing going on in OWF right now. I also enjoyed the paragraph you typed about "Mike Miller" HAWWWWWW..........
good stuff, keep it coming, dawg.
d'oh. I'll go back and change it. There's a comic artist called Mike Miller and I was getting confused.
-
How is it impressive again?
Just avoid any global wars that are actually a threat to your nation, have soft targets, and click "create my nation," about six years ago. Assuming you aren't deleted or run into any other trouble, it's a matter of game mechanics more than skill.
There should be a way to scale damage at lower NS's because this nonsense where only the two people nuking eachother with an ungodly amount of tech being considered " a serious war," is boring.
If you want to set up a top 10 list where that happens, please don't feel like I'm in any way stopping or discouraging you. I'm just trying to draw slightly hyperbolic narratives out of fairly dull statistics, I'm entirely happy for you to ignore it if you want.
(also, Commander Bean is less than five years old and has total war casualties close to four million. Not really the mark of someone avoiding wars)
-
point taken. oyababy is layething the smacketh down.
-
You can never go back. It's not that you want the game to be how it was when you started playing, it's that you want to be the person you were when you started playing.
-
Riddle's Right! Again.
-
I'm very well aware that this is the plan, Barron. Whether it works or not is up to you and Umbrella, and a little bit off topic.
-
if you're talking about a particular nation, go to their profile, click on the wars tab, then choose from the icons under their listed wars.
-
I get mine from Wars Across the Globe.
-
good idea, but maybe you should do another where the complete seven days of a war are counted
I plan to do a new one every day until I can't be bothered any more.
-
Plus i just relized this, but your title should not include earth, because this is Bob, not earth. So your title should have read "The Chorched Bob Top 10: The Most destructive wars in the world"
"scorched earth" refers not to the planet but to the fertile ground. Per Wikipedia "A scorched earth policy is a military strategy which involves destroying anything that might be useful to the enemy while advancing through or withdrawing from an area. It is a military strategy where all of the assets that are used or can be used by the enemy are targeted, such as food sources, transportation, communications, industrial resources, and even the people in the area."
It derives from ancient military tactics that involved burning everything to the ground so your enemy could not regroup.
Also, as I refer to the game as a game several times, it's fairly clear which side of the OOC/IC line I'm on.
-
RnR's highest position was 64:
The Mooch (RnR) vs US Marine (Orange Defense Network) 27,259.51NS destroyed (44%/55%)A pretty decent scrap that ended at update. The Mooch scored a narrow victory on this one, destroying marginally more infra, tech, and land. -
you can pull it from the "wars around the globe" page and then get further details from the war details. I'll put it up later.
-
Bye then.
-
I think you're misinterpreting my conclusions. How the game is played constantly changes based on how alliances decide they want it to change. Politics is consensus. I gave a pretty clear example of that with the shift from white peace only to surrenders being acceptable.
My argument is that Equilibrium have demonstrated how they want to play the game by their actions, and it's remarkably similar to how it was played before. It's not that they couldn't play another way, it's that they aren't playing another way.
-
Even before I opened this I knew it would be a goon complaining. goons can do 3 things well1. ride the coat tails of allies2. beat on alliances a fraction of their size3. complain or cry
I wasn't complaining, I was mocking. You might note there's a difference between the two.
-
Farkistan is an example to us all in this matter. I applaud my former brothers for their brave stance.
-
I have a question for you:
Jean is shorter than Brutus but taller than Imhotep. Imhotep is taller than Jean, but shorter than Lord Scotland. Lord Scotland is twice the height of Jean and Brutus combined but only one-tenth of the height of Millsy. Millsy is at a constant height of x − y. If Jean stands exactly one nautical mile away from Lord Scotland, how tall is Imhotep?
-
oh good, this talking point again.
-
hero, you're such an angry man. I mean, I know you don't have much going for you, and that if you were being honest your rage is really directed inward, but I think there comes a time when you need to let go, accept the world as it is. Learn to love yourself again. Own the rage and forgive yourself, you'll feel better.
-
"you'll get yours" is the best game ever. It doesn't end until I win!
Everyone's lost their mind
in Bowwow's Blue Blog
A blog by Bowwow in General
Posted
I hate all of you, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU, for making me agree entirely with Schattenmann.