Jump to content

Fernando12

Members
  • Posts

    1,751
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fernando12

  1. [quote name='Style #386' timestamp='1294206479' post='2564047'] Poking fun is not permitted. To the re-education spas with you! [/quote] You do realize it's TimLee, I'm quite sure it is permitted. It's only natural Okay, now I'm done here Say sup to TimLee for me if you see him on IRC.
  2. [quote name='Style #386' timestamp='1294206196' post='2564038'] I don't see the relevance of trade circles to this announcement. Your awkward attempts at insulting GATO are best made elsewhere. [/quote] Insulting GATO? Look Style #386, poking a little fun at my buddy TimLee is not insulting GATO but I still think an ODP cancellation is no big deal.
  3. [quote name='Mathias' timestamp='1294205076' post='2564006'] [font="Georgia"]NNK, based on the large amounts of negative PR you've received in this thread, I suggest you backpedal right now and reform.[/font] [/quote] It amazes me that I must agree with Mathias. NNK must reband so that Mathias and I can go back to our normal relations of nit picking each others posts. Pleeeeeeeeeeease NNK, reband!
  4. [quote name='TimLee' timestamp='1294205354' post='2564013'] Sad to see this come to an end. [/quote] I'm sure your former trade circle partners felt the same way. Anyways, it's an optional treaty. No big loss.
  5. Look it, your lone nation is not an alliance. An alliance is 2 or more nations. Others would require you to have 10 or more nations. My requirement is for you to have 2 nations on your AA to use the word alliance. Okay, so your getting whooped but you should learn the ways of our world and quit your complaining. What are you like premadonna perfect? Schatten[b]man[/b] control your savages
  6. This !@#$@#$ sucks. Not Accept. NNK cannot disband, NNK must reband!
  7. [quote name='Mirreille' timestamp='1294195983' post='2563821'] If you are going to criticise the people on the outside of the power structure, then you should be even more willing to criticise the people on the inside of it, since they actually have power to change things.[/quote] What would those currently in power ever want to change? They are in power, what would that change be? Their job is to hold on to power, they just need to maintain the status quo to keep that power. [quote name='Mirreille' timestamp='1294195983' post='2563821'] The people on the outside would have to fight just to get into that position in the first place. Most of the people on the outside now are doing the same things they did back when The Hegemony was in power; [b]keeping their heads down and trying to survive[/b]. Starving people have much simpler priorities then looking to the horizon. [/quote] Many alliances aren't ready for a fight but it's only because most alliances on the opposing side of those in this OP are quite honestly not very good or well built enough to be effective. They don't have large enough upper tiers to win a war. They have had an equal amount of time to build but haven't. Sure MK and others have had reps to help build their tech levels, but that excuse only goes so far. It's been almost a year since Bipolar, yet many alliances haven't made much progress in building up their tech or military wonders. They are indeed just surviving and existing and keeping their heads so far down they can't pick themselves up.
  8. [quote name='youwish959' timestamp='1294191313' post='2563711'] What is up? [/quote] Pezstar and Ardus are going around in circles about stuff and Voytek found out he isn't the most respected or trusted MKer.
  9. [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1294186793' post='2563611'] Yes. You do. If you don't want to share then you don't have to, but don't play dumb. The only former allies we have any complaints against are Polaris and yourself. You may now return to your regularly scheduled press conference. [/quote] What complaints against Polaris? That they honored their treaty and took pressure off MK in the last war? Yourself? Just Pezstar or STA?
  10. [quote name='pezstar' timestamp='1294182422' post='2563534'] We were halfway hoping that would blow up and be a Big Deal. We know that a few of the alliances in power are gunning for Polaris, and there was basically no way that conflict could have turned into a NpO beatdown. [/quote] Which are these alliances you consider to be gunning for Polaris?
  11. Devils Advocate... Peggy and her bunch are fighting a war. Is it ok for her to disrupt alliance communications so she and her bunch could coordinate their attacks while their opponents scramble? Not to get this off topic, but I'm assuming it would definitely not be ok for her if it wasn't "her property" to actually hack the forum and have done what she done...something like that could be criminal? Good luck to UPN getting everything back. My suggestion would be to use free forums so that when a founder or alliance leader leaves or steps down or is not re-elected they turn over all Admin powers to the incoming government and nothing is lost. Be sure to check all Admin accounts so that no extra users are masked that could be old govs accounts.
  12. [quote name='Garrow' timestamp='1294100900' post='2562431'] I have Iron & Furs Put me into a trade circle plz, no color preference. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=437305 [/quote] I can get you in a RED 3BR, but no uranium. Your nation is small and I'm sure if you are IRC active you can easily find a temp trade once you fully join Legacy. Below is my nation link, message me in game so I know you read this and are willing to join and be on RED Team. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=333444 [u][b]***Also, GET A HARBOR ASAP***[/b][/u]
  13. [quote name='TimLee' timestamp='1294073590' post='2562008'] Good Evening, [b]Assembly Chairman:[/b] TimLee [/quote] TimLee, I would expect you would have had a little more class than to dump a trade circle without notice. Thanks alot. $15mil/250tech NAO!
  14. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1294100250' post='2562426'] The problem is Sirius isn't shooting to control the world. This is a color unity bloc. We're not out to make the blue team control the world. [/quote] Color Unity? Yay!? You're right, not shooting to control the world is the problem with Sirius. Blue team unity? You're really more dividing blue than uniting it. Blue anything will never be relevant without NpO, so what's the point? Blue team unity is not really a good rallying cry, it's boring tbh.
  15. [quote name='DictatatorDan' timestamp='1294100195' post='2562425'] [color="#FF0000"]*sigh* So back to my question, because Altergo's writing is lacking, but is obviously meant to bash the predominant alliances in the world, what is so bad about this hegemony as opposed to the old one?[/color] [/quote] It isn't the old one. When the power switches ask the same question, the answer will be the same...it isn't the old one. If your not in power it's bad because your not in power. You are right that the only way to change things is to line up allies that can take on the alliances in the OP. Until that happens, this group will remain the main power.
  16. [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1294098445' post='2562404'] Strength doesn't always come in numbers. [/quote] Can you tell me the last war that was won with fewer numbers or a very small upper tier? What you say sounds nice, but it isn't practical to think that way. I wish your bloc well, but you need to build a large upper tier.
  17. [quote name='Tarikmo' timestamp='1294096788' post='2562376'] My god, your right, at this rate the bloc will be as bad as your posting! We'll address this issue as soon as someone cares, thanks for the input. [/quote] Your bloc would carry more political weight if it was more obligatory defense and if all member alliances had at least or near 100 members. 2 of the alliances don't even have 25 nations. The bloc looks good on paper, but has lots of work to do. I will give you guys credit for acquiring SCY and Keve69.
  18. [quote name='Londo Mollari' timestamp='1294093375' post='2562315'] No alliances in that group have power to do anything other than stagnate the world because none will or can wield it first in any capacity. [/quote] Individually no, but when that group moves as one yes. The problem is not the new hegemony. It's those (us) on the other side that sit on our asses and just complain. To all that see themselves opposed to the alliances in the OP: What are you doing about it? I see nothing being done besides these type of topics that accomplish nothing. What should we do about it? Get over ourselves and join together to reach the one political goal that unites us? Yes, otherwise every time a war breaks out the result will be the same. Either an alliance will fall on their sword and be praised for taking the curb stomp alone or the entire coalition will be curb stomped because many alliances stay out or only fight on fronts where they cannot lose or will be given white peace. The failure is us alliances that can't seem to reach out. MK went out and got TOP. Big task yes, but they did it. Can anyone name a similar achievement that any of us on the small end of the treaty web has had? Nope, just the same BS and the same complaints. Waiting to see if SF and PB tear each other apart could take a long time [i]IF[/i] it even ever happens. Forge new political alliances. NOT friendships, the $%&@ with that. You don't need to be all cuddly with every alliance in a future coalition. You just need to have the same goal. What's the goal? Easy, to not be dictated to at every turn. To not be told to pay $15mil/250tech for a damn trade circle gone bad. To not be rolled for $6mil. Sounds like a silly goal, but making topics like this and making claims from a freaking Toad Stool, or some stupid idiotic Carlos Accords ain't gonna get it done. Open up your FAs and seek out like minded alliances for $%&@s sake.
  19. [center][img]http://www.cyberpresse.ca/images/bizphotos/435x290/200902/19/49403.jpg[/img][/center] Have a seat for a second. Look it, I have never seen a bunch of alliances look so !@#$@#$ down when something bad happens. What are you alliances? Like prima donna perfect that if you can't $%&@in' handle adversity? So !@#$'s not going right. It's not $%&@en' working the last two years. !@#$@#$ get your heads out of your ass and !@#$@#$ make it work by outworking this hegemony. You kill two !@#$@#$ blocs (Citadel/C&G), and then we stand around and watch while they !@#$@#$ form Pandora here. !@#$@#$ yous come to the OWF like $%&@in' this and when the power PR play it's not working so you're trying to stick handle, you're looking like this and not standing. Outwork the !@#$@#$ hegemony alliances! If you want it, don't just think you want it. Go out and !@#$@#$ want it. But you're not looking like you want it, you look like you're feeling sorry for yourself. And nobody !@#$@#$ wants anybody that's feeling sorry for themselves. You got time. You're down by one !@#$@#$ shot. Surely to $%&@ we can deal with this.
  20. [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1294031509' post='2561591'] I'm not moving at all. I'm sipping my coffee and mumbling something about the 'damn kids'. Maybe mustaches aren't funny to some people....who knows. [/quote] I had a similar mumble while drinking out of my sippy cup, something about old people trying to be cool when their really not.
  21. [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1294030457' post='2561571'] Amazing. A thread that has me agreeing with Fernando. [/quote] It must be the new year. I wonder though, are you moving closer to me or am I moving closer to you? Politically speaking of course.
  22. I have no sense of humor apparently. This was stupid when the "accords" was announced and this is even stupider. And not really funny.
  23. Congrats to LoSS and this term's government. Also congrats on the amazing growth. 128 new members in 50 days is awesome.
×
×
  • Create New...