Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fernando12

  1. [quote name='Voytek' timestamp='1294886839' post='2573679'] If A Joke Is Funny Once It Is Always Funny (Forever) [/quote] No. I laughed at you once, but no longer. So no a joke is not always funny (forever).
  2. Having NpO help out with tech agreements is certainly a plus, having their friendship is priceless. Congratulations, keep growing, and have another great 90 days.
  3. Happy Birthday on this epic day GATO and many more.
  4. [quote name='potato' timestamp='1294834441' post='2573082'] I don't care. [/quote] Yes you do and Archon does. It's the purpose of this topic. Make it easier for MK to be sanctioned ITT. You care, stop lying. Lying is bad.
  5. [quote name='potato' timestamp='1294832517' post='2573065'] You don't seem to get but let me repeat it once more. We do not want the sanction. [/quote] I don't believe you.
  6. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1294815883' post='2572906'] [i]We don't want the sanction and nobody sane would ever want it except for the flag[/i] [/quote] I don't believe you. You are lying.
  7. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1294815254' post='2572885'] ^ hahahahahaha of course [i]you[/i] don't get it either Once again you prove your utter illiteracy. Seriously, what is wrong with you? We don't want the rule changed specifically for us, we don't even want the damn sanction. The requirement was already lowered before and it should have been again years ago, as the population continued to decline. It doesn't matter if it's MCXA or RIA who gets the sanction from us, the point, which you have again missed even after having it pointed out to you so directly, is that five alliances are being skipped over. [/quote] Once again you prove your utter illiteracy. Seriously, what is wrong with you?I haven't missed the point. You are missing the point. If you and those five alliances that are going to be skipped over want the sanction then you and they need to recruit. It's been pointed out several times in this thread that you all need to recruit to keep the sanction, go do it and quit your crying. EDIT - Mods, I was typing as the post above mine was made. I didn't see it until after I clicked to post.
  8. [quote name='Epiphanus' timestamp='1294815058' post='2572874'] OP makes a good post and a good point about an inherent flaw in the game mechanics. People read what alliance makes said post. Baawing ensues. But really, why do we even need a limit? If alliance score is what an alliance is ranked on, shouldn't it also be the sole factor to determine which alliances are sanctioned? [/quote] No, it should not be the sole factor.
  9. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1294814447' post='2572862'] Literally the only thing that matters is the flag. Beyond that having the sanction is actually detrimental to your alliance. Now that we have two flags, it's not really an issue. Anyway, why are so many of you missing the (incredibly basic and clear) point? It's not some kind of hidden swipe at MCXA or something, it's saying that the requirement is outdated and terrible. [/quote] Why don't you go tell Admin to change it then? Because you guys are really only attention whoring and taking jabs at an alliance you deemed not worthy should you lose it. The MK pattern is well known. Be it arbitrary or not, the requirement is the current rule. You guys aren't special enough to have it reduced. Gnite.
  10. [quote name='TheNeverender' timestamp='1294812096' post='2572813'] The 19th ranked alliance in the game, the MCXA, is next in line to get a sanction. Nineteenth. Ranked. Alliance. [/quote] STA signs a big treaty so you come up with this to attention whore and shoot insults at MCXA. Stay classy Archon.
  11. [quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1294801681' post='2572616'] Excuse me but "Hell Freezes Over" should be reserved for parings such as an MK/NPO MADP, a GOONS/FARK MADP, NpO/\m/ MADP or some such. Either way good luck with this treaty, you're going to need it. [/quote] It's taking you all some time to come up with a fabricated CB so you all can launch a "defensive war". When is it exactly that they will need it. Might as well let us all know so we can plan and skip school and stuff for such a great event.
  12. Congrats, this is an excellent treaty. I think this awesome occasion calls for Tyga's Siberian Cub Avatar!
  13. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1294786618' post='2572325'] More of this !@#$? If only it was you two fighting, mutual destruction would be fitting for you both. Although, aren't you supposed to be under terms? [/quote] I think Damsky thought he would win and use his gains to pay all the tech he owes under the terms that were given to him. He'll end up losing alot of the cash that was sent to him to buy the tech for those Celestial Being terms and not have any cash left to purchase the tech to send out. Hope his owners in CB are lenient towards him.
  14. [quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1294792044' post='2572417'] If you think this is how treaties work out, you're more disillusioned than I had originally anticipated and that is if it's possible. Fyi, most are rooting against you this war including myself. Not that it matters, just wanted to let you know most would rather see you burn rather than see you continue on. [/quote] Yes, I was entirely serious about the treaties or you're a bit dumb. Most rooting against me? So be it. It's not really a war though. I wouldn't dare insult all the real wars that have been fought and call this a war. If we burn we burn, but not likely against Damsky.
  15. I think the only way we will be able to defeat Damsky is to hope. I still believe in a place called Hope, a place called the treaty web. The United States - Federation of Allied Republics - New Polar Order - Ragnarok - SuperFriends - Complaints & Grievances - Pandoras Box It's the only thing we can do to defeat the [s]Brotherhood[/s] Only Child of Steel. To hope treaties get activated
  16. Sup Damsky, no where near your range but I'm sure you'll have fun. How am I a hypocrite? Which hypocrisy did I commit. I know I am a hypocrite so I just want to know which one you are using.
  17. That's gotta hurt like a well you known. What did this guy do again? Was he WTF at one point? I remember getting him in a trade circle.
  18. [quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1294724273' post='2571788'] The whole thing's a bit of a mess as far I can tell between RIA and UINE. Honestly, yeah, we lost nations, but the past 2 weeks alone, we gained 14 nations (I see you didn't include NSO applicant when you brought up that number). Of course we're rebuilding. We got stomped twice. At least we have the will to rebuild and still give a damn and produce something tangible for the rest of Bob, unlike you. That's a spirit that can never be killed in us, no matter how much bottom feeders like to try. [/quote] The whole thing between RIA and UINE is no big deal, Keve69 even said it should be canceled. How will you all rebuild if you guys admittedly don't know much about nation building? Your own members have said it and it's about the only thing I believe from them. Your first stomping was damn near a year ago. The second was 5 months ago. It's been long enough and yet no recovery. What that says is NSO doesn't enforce war chests and are lousy at acquiring tech. What is NSO producing that is tangible? UINE is at least doing something by joining a bloc and raiding small alliances NSO next big move is...getting stomped again?
  19. [quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1294722794' post='2571770'] Right, because the past month hasn't been a straight increase in our membership or anything, or a sizable overhaul in the way we run things, and our government turnover hasn't been lower since the times of Ivan, never mind the fact that our activity levels are comparable to the first few months since NSO's founding. Just because we're taking a more conservative approach right now in Foreign Affairs doesn't means we're pointless. However, logic may not be your strong suit, so I'll just say lolno. I'll be sure to let Heft know we should simply disband posthaste. I swear, do you ever say anything of substance? Anyway, let's get this back on track. LolUINE. [/quote] NSO lost 76 nations since the TENE/RoK $6million War, 170 nations going into the War, NSO has 94 now. NSO has not recovered any of the NS it lost. At the time of the war NSO had about 3.5mil NS. Barely over 1.5mil NS now. So for you to LOL @ UINE for losing a treaty is pretty stupid. And don't worry, you don't need to tell Heft, he already knows.
  20. [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1294715565' post='2571686'] [color="#0000FF"]The treaty ever existing in the first place does not, however. I am not sure why RIA ever signed a treaty with Stunt Blue Alliance (whatever number UINE is assigned). Really, it is a pointless alliance to even sign a pointless treaty with.[/color] [/quote] Are the stunts better on brown? Will they be better on white? Pointless alliance? When was the last time NSO had a point? Ever since Ivan left, it's been downhill with your membership leaving to better alliances. You guys should merge back into the motherland. You serve no purpose, you haven't for well over a year. I once had enormous respect for you all. Too bad only Ivan knew how to lead NSO.
  21. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1294712337' post='2571615'] Ok it's taking everything I have to not be a dickhead in this announcement. Congrats to Catland and SWAT, because he is awesome. Good luck out there RIA. [/quote] Don't worry Omni, I'll do it. This has to be the stupidest waste of space I've seen ever. It's so not funny and pathetic. This is our world I guess
  22. [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1294685872' post='2571210'] Perhaps you should take it instead as a sign that a fair number of people are sitting around drumming their fingers, mumbling "well, get on with it!" You do have something planned I hope other than waiting for another opportunity to attack Pacifica again or picking off a mid-tier alliance on a trumped up CB I hope. [/quote] It's not the alliances in power that need to "get on with it!" Did you ever think that they sit around drumming their fingers hoping those on the opposite side have something planned that would actually be a threat to them to where it would make things interesting and challenging for them. Boredom is caused by those of us that can't seem to put a damn thing together to challenge them. It's our fault they are still in power.
  23. I was serious about a CN fanstasy draft to get your allies for the year
  24. I think the best result would be to hold a fantasy draft yearly. Draft your allies for the year and no more calling out people/alliances for what they did the previous year. The United States has one ally and that is our protector. FAR's allies are awesome so I wouldn't want them to cancel any. I think a better question would be which enemy treaty would you like to see canceled that perhaps would clear up some of the treaty mess.
  25. Needs more Paburo, oh wait he's gone Congrats guys
  • Create New...