Jump to content

Timmmehhh

Banned
  • Posts

    1,018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Timmmehhh

  1. [quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1298277622' post='2640478'] No. He is a ghost, no more no less. He is no member of GATO. [/quote] Is this guy a ghost? http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=117939&Extended=0 Because he was the guy who fled GATO and became a POW shortly after, according to Alterego's post. Surprised to see a lot of alliances still allow deserters back in their alliance. I saw MCXA doing it but I thought they were an exception.
  2. Apparently the guy who became POW is now back in GATO. It's a large nation too. Not some clueless noob.
  3. I thought this thread be a DOW to help against the evil forces of Dark Templar. I am disappointed it's not.
  4. LOL, Myworld keep up with the attitude, it might backfire immensely.....
  5. [color=#00BFFF]•[/color] [img]http://i48.tinypic.com/1442r0g.png[/img] 14 [379] [color=black](+0)[/color] [color=blue][b]New Polar Order[/b][/color] : 25.81 --> 25.27 [color=red](-0.54)[/color] [color=#FF8C00]•[/color] 17 {173} [color=red](-1)[/color] [color=orange][i]FOK[/i][/color] : 24.04 --> 24.50 [color=green](+0.46)[/color] More scars
  6. [img]http://i51.tinypic.com/2m5fbs6.jpg[/img]
  7. [quote name='bakamitai' timestamp='1296934240' post='2620794'] What about CCC? Did I miss the thread, or are you guys still going at it? [/quote] We are still at war with CCC and NpO.
  8. [quote name='Veneke' timestamp='1296576021' post='2614708'] I see you have yet to conquer the concept of time. Allow me to give you the short version of it. Ragnarok and the 57th declared war against Poison Clan, stay with me now, [i]at the same time[/i]. This means that they moved together, as a unit to declare war on Poison Clan. When that happened, it was only Rok and 57th hitting PC. So to claim that the 57th "jumped them" while Rok and Polar were fighting PC is just plain ridiculous. In fact, it boggles the mind. Ah yes, the day long war Fok had by declaring on a single member of the 57th... Want to know what's really amusing? The backpedaling that your alliance did when we talked about it. [/quote] Yeah FOK is afraid for the mighty 57th Overlanders
  9. Can you do another "where is the nuclear heat map" That's my favorite.
  10. FOK is grateful for your help Guru Order. Thank you
  11. [quote name='Robster83' timestamp='1296570244' post='2614637'] It is called strategy. When you go in for the long haul ready to be curbstomped you tend to put a significant amount of nations in PM. They want to stay and fight for their allies. I really hope that MCXA's views do not reflect your own... Furthermore you signed the agreement to stay out of the DH - NPO conflict... So that is you letting yet more allies down. I am not one to criticise people when they surrender, but your reply is just disrespectful and totally absurd. [/quote] Yeah it might be a strategy, but it is also pretty lame that your alliance is mostly hiding in peacemode, while your bigger ally is taking all the hits. Also alliances who just sit in peacemode and stay in it the entire war contribute just as much to to the war effort as the ones who have surrendered. There is certainly a point to be made that alliances who use this tactic could be considered as surrendered alliances ass well. I fought MCXA before, they did hang in a long time while losing huge amounts of NS when they fought us, but they stayed in nevertheless. Now with no allies left in the conflict it makes sense to get out and let Polar fight their own fights.
  12. Good to see PC and Athens fighting together We also helped PC a bit against these people who conveniently jumped them while they were fighting Ragnarok and Polar. Also the big talk from 2000 NS 57th overlanders nations is quite amusing
  13. Good to see peace, well done everyone. Basketball Ninja's seem solid fighters.
  14. A total of 5 DOW's, wow that's bad Schattenman, the influence your cult will have in this conflict is close to 0 if you only declare 5 offensive wars with micronations. Seems that the only reason this alliance exist is so you can make his crazy announcements in alliance politics instead of world affairs.
  15. [quote name='xoindotnler' timestamp='1296103029' post='2604318'] Got to love the peace mode jokes, its not like iFOK has some people in it or something like that. No sir. [/quote] The iFOK'ers who are in peacemode are almost all in nuclear anarchy. I somehow doubt if it's the same with Legion.
  16. [quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1296146445' post='2605727'] It's actually closer to the IRON-Gramlins strategy, IMO. Dominate the lower tiers and gradually begin throwing higher nations into the grinder. [/quote] Gremlins died because of inactivity not because some great strategy was used to beat them, remember they were outnumbered like 10:1. Good luck bringing hundreds of WRC powered nuclear nations down, it just won't work. There are several cons to peacemoding high tier nations. First of al your highest nations who you don't peace will still be fighting nations with like 130% their strength. Also if you go mass peacemode it's easy to see who are inactive because those are the guys who aren't in peacemode, those nations will get slaughtered. As last thing I wanted to mention is that for alliances like Legion who have used peacemode as a flee and hide tactic in the past it's hard to get all those nations out of peacemode to fight because a lot of these nations are used to staying in the peacemode untill the war is over. You will get a "why should I fight if the rest of my alliance is peacemode" mentality. In FOK we always have the topnations fighting and leading the way. Just to set a good example.
  17. I saw this post, checked the wars on GOONS and realized that Doomhouse, FAN and allies have already won.
  18. Timmmehhh

    I give up

    Yes we (FOK) asked assistance from MK the moment CCC declared on us. All our toptier was in anarchy so we needed help to counter the attacks. We are very happy with the quickness MK came in to defend us
  19. CCC are hitting FOK, not iFOK.
  20. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1296083789' post='2603479'] The same alliance that was literally targeted "for fun". What did they do to deserve what was done to them? [/quote] You are mistaken, we have more than enough reasons to hit NpO beside the spy issue. If you want to know you can hit me up on irc.
  21. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1296083368' post='2603451'] It wouldn't matter. IAA was nothing but nice to MK. We supported all of their decisions over and over again, but still here we are in a bad position. [/quote] You can blame Polar for that.
  22. Wow, great piece. This is exactly what I have been thinking. Also we could have chosen to deploy just 10 alliances on the New Polar Order and take them out without escalating it but were is the fun in that? I am looking forward to a good fight with NpO. It should be a close one.
×
×
  • Create New...