Ttaagg

The terms state: How do the Karma forces intend to enforce this if issues arise? Consider the single GGA member to be in breach? Or would you plan to take action against the recipient, also? I'm wary that your terms are not simply terms for GGA, but rather for all of Bob. While I really don't expect to receive aid from GGA, I have no obligation to return that aid, unless you are supposing that this pact, to which neither me, my alliance, nor even close allies are signatories, is applicable to me.

"Unimportant" announcements? But, but....

mhawk and TPF, I salute you.

Bonus resources: Steel, construction, fine jewelry, affluent population Marble - salithus Lumber - pinchazi Iron - pinchazi Aluminum - Gold - Silver - coldfff Coal - Darth Andrew Gems - Darth Andrew Fish - TTaagg Wine - TTaagg Furs - coldfff Whatevs* - pigs: salithus What you get, disregarding the wildcard: -39% infra cost -18% infra upkeep +13% citizens +$10 citizen income +10.5 happiness -5% tech cost +28% soldier efficiency -$3 soldier cost -8% aircraft cost -5% tank upkeep -5% land cost +15% purchased land area x3 natural growth of nation +10 aircraft limit If you want in, either post here, or send me a PM (on these forums or in game, doesn't matter). Harbor is required for this trading circle. Also, our wildcard slot is already filled, so both of your resources must match things needed. Since the current people in the circle are all blue, preference will be given for blue nations or those who are willing to change colors.

Or make it a soft-cap. It progresses by the current rule up until 5, and then by some new rule with a slower growth rate.

They are like the ultra-longshot, 476:1 payout horse. I'm a bad gambler, but man, think of the crazy payout!

We needed to make an announcement about the applicant AA and wanted to add something substantial to it. But, I must sincerely apologize. The OP was crafted entirely to appeal to the wit of you, Uncle Stalin. Apparently, we were off by a little bit. I'm going to go crunch numbers through our "Uncle Stalin Ultimate Comedy Kombobulator" and see if we can find a better OP for you.

Maybe you should check out Bob Janova's thread. He's already got a list of treaties, and a lot more (a "tension" factor based on how people are aligned, and a great piece of software to look at the messy messy web).

I was gonna vote FAN, but they aren't on the list. So I went with Vox.

Not just a meat shield. I remember the meat ship. Ugh, too much bacon.

Give this man a prize. Atheist Republican. His name barely fit!

I thought of something to add. jk *TTaagg goes to find legitimate additions among all the new war threads.*

I read the evens. But not the odd pages, heh. Anyone read them?

Better question: are there bandwagoners in the war already? (In reference to "big dogs" I meant simply the entire other side of the war, as I can't think of a large alliance that is bandwagoning, though I could be wrong.)

Haha, this is awesome, MHA for lyfe yo! No, seriously, avoid going to war with the big dogs because you're too afraid to lose some NS or something. But then fight the "bandwagoners" to "uphold" your treaty. I'd call you classy, but I think the sarcasm would be lost.

Dear, Tru Hart Brak N, Who are you? -Sincerely, TTaagg. Must be an old goon...

Indeed, "very", two. But the first and last had four. (Something with five sylls)

This shows good effort; but don't think you get haikus. It's five seven five.

Is Random a god? I thought Admin was the One. Polytheism.

Vague antecedent. Is it GOONS or another? Puzzling. Please fix it.

Ooh, its storytime! Who is this B A P S? (Sorry, I'm new here.)

G O O N, huh? Good sir, did you intend goon? Or, member of GOONS*? *GOONS, dead alliance. Not the new sexier group. <some S A catchphrase>

Holy &#33;@#&#036;buckets! The gloves are coming off now. Pal, them's fighting words. (I suck at haikus. *thinks of a better reply* Nope, I got nothing.)

I suppose I do. Are there any in specific that you think ridiculous or unjustifiable? Perhaps I did some hand-waving to get the result that I desired. I'm having a hard time conceptualizing peace under your definition of stably existing, but I suppose that is precisely your point. And I'm not sure my friendship derail was relevant to our discussion of peace, but I must ask whether you think the nature of a friendship is perspective-relational or there is an absolute descriptor. (So if I consider X to be a genuine friend, but X just chills with me because its politically convenient, does that make the friendship genuine from my side, or absolutely 'fake' friendship, or possibly something else?) OOC: Oops, thanks for the reminder. OOC2: Apparently the name of another browser game I referenced in my previous post is censored. Heh.

Honestly, I think that this is a terrible idea. On paper, it sounds pretty decent, stopping espionage and all. However, just like everything I've ever bought on an infomercial, it fails to live up to its promise. As noted above, the average member isn't usually given much sensitive information in a political sense, so the biggest threats of spies don't lie in the rank-and-file, but in the priveleged members (squad captains up through the government). Granted, you might catch a spy or two, but they are likely to be nothing more than low-level, unknown-to-both-sides sort of spy, which deals no harm other than nominally. But by launching this counter-espionage offensive, you reassure dangerous and experience spies of their safety. IP addresses are easy to change via a proxy. If I were a spy, I'd definitely run all connections through a proxy just to take away the most obvious identification. Meanwhile, by signing up for this, there is at least an implicit idea that this helps to prevent and expose spies. Anyways, I'm off to start a lucrative spying career.