Jump to content

Jerichoholic

Members
  • Posts

    172
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jerichoholic

  1. I'll add those two changes once I verify them. I didn't forget them. They were under 10 nations when I was removing all the micros. My drop line is 10 nations and my add line is 20 nations (so I don't have to keep removing/adding nations that are right around a certain number.
  2. [quote name='John Warbuck' date='18 February 2010 - 12:05 AM' timestamp='1266469514' post='2188911'] Troy surrendered and white peace was given to all else that did not limit anyone's ability for re-entry. Read much? [/quote] [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=80222]White peace = surrendering?[/url]
  3. Those men weren't brave, they were mercenary scum who deserved a quick and brutal death!
  4. Considering they just screwed around with your nation a bit and didn't do things like attacking the nations it declared on, etc are you sure it was a CN player that compromised your account and not somebody from somewhere else? If you weren't using the same password for all of them, it's likely they got your email address first and then saw what you were registered to (forums, cn, etc) and went from there. If they got a bunch of different accounts that are on separate emails which don't have common passwords, it's likely you're infected with a keylogger and they got all your stuff that way. It could still be a CN player, or it could just as easily be someone you know on facebook, someone you talk to in irc or other chat programs, another forum you visit or you just downloaded and ran the wrong executable somewhere. Good luck.
  5. I hear you on the curling subject, Gopher. Curling is pretty much the only olympic sport I care about and can stand to watch. [quote name='Iamrecognized' date='18 February 2010 - 01:08 AM' timestamp='1266473333' post='2189037'] MHA, Sparta, etc will all gain a bit pretty quickly at the end of the war. I know I plan to buy back most my lost infra immediately, and we've got the cash to do that and load up our lower level nations with tons of aid. So, expect some gains there. Plus rebuying all the nukes pretty quick. That combined with the usual neutral drops after a war (when the people who joined the neutrals to stay out of the fight leave) will probably keep them out of 2nd. But you never know. [/quote] Judging by the lack of surrenders on either side, I doubt this war is anywhere close to being over.
  6. You really need to upgrade. IE8 is out or (even better) get Firefox or Opera. IE8, Chrome and Safari all have unpatched vulnerabilities which make them a target for exploitation.
  7. Taken from the wiki, blah blah blah. You know the drill
  8. o/ OoJ Have fun out there. NEW are great people to war with.
  9. Apparently omploader redirects some images from forums.cybernations.net/* to the "you are gay, lols" image. I started hosting on imageshack instead.
  10. Some people see that, I don't. I have no idea why it's doing that
  11. eh Jan 28: [code] TOP: 56.44 IRON: 52.71 MK: 35.23 [/code] Feb 13: [code] TOP: 36.16 IRON: 30.88 MK: 22.92 [/code] Difference: [code] TOP: -20.28 (-35.93%) IRON: -21.83 (-41.42%) MK: -12.31 (-34.94%) [/code]
  12. [quote name='Ivan Moldavi' date='12 February 2010 - 09:35 AM' timestamp='1265985353' post='2177560'] Actually, to be fair, in some circles that is a common groupthink. If you are "king of the hill" then there is always someone planning to push you off, right? In this instance I believe they went about it the wrong way but it is a fairly easy analysis that lends itself to the war eventually escalating to the point at which CnG would have entered opposite TOP at some future point. Prior to the pre-emptive declaration the talk was that Athens wanted to declare on Polar very badly and was being held back but if IRON had declared on Fark and the chain would have continued through that process (which is what I believe should have happened) the "sides" would have stayed almost exactly the same overall with a few notible (and sizeable) exceptions. But ultimately, whether through natural progression or this pre-emptive strike TOP and CnG would have been on opposing sides had escalation continued unchecked, as I believe it would have. Note: That does not mean I believe the pre-emptive strike was justified as it was handled, just that the end result would have ultimately been the same most likely. Although the sides would have been a bit more even overall I imagine had they made the progression correctly. [/quote] If IRON declared on Fark, wouldn't that make SF a bigger threat than C&G? Seeing as, ya know, they are a member of the SuperFriends and all...
  13. Only a couple additions this time around.
  14. Listen NEW, just because we're warring TFD doesn't mean we want to stop warring you. Maybe we can all get together sometime and come to an understanding NEW TFD RoK
  15. I have no idea why it did that, but I thought it was hilarious too... I use graphing software on one of my servers. I get declarations off the wiki, it wasn't there when I made this You're added in for the next update (as is SLCB's new declaration) Ha, I'll see what I can do
  16. [quote name='Penkala' date='11 February 2010 - 11:00 PM' timestamp='1265947259' post='2176428'] Are you seriously going to try to turn an offer of white peace into a claim that Karma is as bad as the Hegemony? [i]Seriously?[/i] [/quote] If Sparta had any honor they would...give crippling reps? I guess? [quote name='Lincongrad' date='12 February 2010 - 01:38 PM' timestamp='1265999936' post='2177863'] While I'm not quite as paranoid as my brother there, Athens hasn't exactly given us a lot of hope for the future. His paranoia isn't coming out of the blue here. [/quote] As far as I can tell, nobody in Supergrievences/Karma/Hegemony 2.0/whatever we are this week has been trying to be world police.
  17. [quote name='Methrage' date='09 February 2010 - 11:39 AM' timestamp='1265733551' post='2170700'] That was showing they had chosen a side and were in a coalition. I can respect that GOD was upfront about it and just declared, what I'm tired of is revisionism by some that CnG was neutral and an innocent victim. I know MK isn't stupid and doesn't march into war blindly, in order to win alliances coordinate and declare where needed. TOP/IRON just decided to skip to it rather than fiddle around with treaties to justify something that was going to happen anyways. [/quote] You can fight on the same side and not be in the coalition. See: TOP during Karma [quote name='Buds The Man' date='09 February 2010 - 01:00 PM' timestamp='1265738440' post='2170823'] IF C&G win there handling of the peace will truly state whether the KARMA war was just or was it simply an oppurtunity to take out NPO and the rest was simple propoganda. Time will only tell. C&G was a threat to the coalition that TOP/IRON were in. [/quote] How so? Even if they were preparing for an attack on one of their allies (I'm not in CnG so I don't know), that doesn't justify attacking them. Since when is simply being allied to somebody you are going to attack a CB? [quote name='Buds The Man' date='09 February 2010 - 01:00 PM' timestamp='1265738440' post='2170823'] Im not the log dumping kind of guy but I know for a FACT by admission from a CnG govt member they were set to counter IRON/TOP where ever they entered. That is why they were in PM. If that doesnt make them part of the coalition I dont know what else does. TOP/IRON werent even involved yet and were being targeted. It didnt matter where they came in with GODs blanket DOW it would have chained back to CnG. Now CnGs motto is take one of us take us all no one stands alone. They are very adimant about that so why would anyone think any different so by Declaring on all of CnG it just saves time. CnG placed them selves in this war and were waiting for TOP/IRON. They were just beaten to the punch. [/quote] This argument is completely without merit if you aren't going to provide proof. Anybody can say "I know for a FACT by admission from a <insert alliance A here> govt member that they are going to DOW on <insert alliance B/bloc here>", it doesn't mean it's true. [quote name='Buds The Man' date='09 February 2010 - 01:00 PM' timestamp='1265738440' post='2170823'] Sure it could have but it still doesnt change the fact that CnG had alliances waiting for TOP/IRON to enter the war. NOPE TOP/IRON went out in a coalition effort. As soon as peace was signed all that had to be done was an offer of WP and walk away. No real damage had been done yet everyone could have gone home. I didnt see any offers from the other side, they wanted this war, and by Archons request that as soon as these forces enter to take the peace they got exactly what they wanted. NO im not saying all this was a plot to take out IRON/TOP what I am saying is there came an oppurtunity and it was utilized brilliantly by C&G. I can do naught but tip my hat to them. [/quote] So what you're saying is that a bloc which had none of its members fighting in the war was part of a coalition? Your attack was simply to try and destroy a bloc because of mutual dislike. DITT didn't do it to protect their ally or the coalition, otherwise they would have attacked alliances already involved. Hell, you didn't even bother to attack the bloc that already had 3 members involved in wars against your "coalition"
  18. Forgot to post this yesterday
  19. [quote name='heggo' date='09 February 2010 - 04:18 PM' timestamp='1265750317' post='2171152'] Yeah, but Polaris is also engaged on another front I hear, so they can only give so much support. [/quote] NpO/GOD wars: 54 NpO/TOP wars: 7 http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?Page=2&searchstring=Declaring_Alliance,Receiving_Alliance&search=darkness%20polar http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?searchstring=Declaring_Alliance%2CReceiving_Alliance&search=paradox+polar
×
×
  • Create New...