TigerBaby

Simple avenue to demonstrate his superiority isn't there. Decom his 25 nukes then declare on 3 STA nations to put himself in an equivalent position to that you were in then "pound them all to hell" But I susepct everyone arpound here already knows that wont be happening. We're talking about a non entity who couldn't without nukes take on one alone far less the 3 nations you were engaged with while you had just two nukes a day to their dozens. I volunteer to be one of the 3 and if this non entity can prove his superiority in the fashion described I will demand you hand over STA leadership to him. And in fact fact it can be done. I have recently been handing ass kickings to multiple nations myself while they had dozens of nukes to my two a day. That's why both you and I are in the top group of damage handed out this war and that non entity loser isn't. But again I have given him a way to prove me wrong. But don't expect the courage to take that opportunity to be forthcoming.

Laughing my socks off. Tell me what sort of alternate reality does a babbling non entity like you exist in? Let me give you some statistics from this war. This is you, a total of 7 wars and a total 73,722 damage dealt. And this is Tyga, 21 wars against mu;ltiple opponents every time and damage dealt 248,177 which was more than the damage he took despite the fact he had nothing but two daily nukes the majority of which were thwarted. He dealt more damage than ALL nations in the war except for 10. Unlike you who is so far down the rankings and so irrelevant I didn't even bother checking the loser ranking you have. But continue with that type of absurdity because believe me everyone on both sides knows how ludicrous it is. And actually if you want come ahead. Come pound me to hell. You and me one on one. You have thousands more tech than I do and 25 nukes to my zero. Not even a contest right? How could you lose? Oh wait a minute I know how. Because then you would find out what it's like to be a REAL loser facing someone who has only one war against a loser like you despite the fact you're still outgunning them.

What does that even mean? His ambition is simply to stick to his word and assist allies he has enetered into an agreement with which he has done against the odds then that somehow refllects poorly on his convictions? That even makes sense to you? And out of curiosity what exactly is your ambition? Duck and hide unless you can get into a situation where you outnumber the opposition by 10 to 1? That's an admirable ambition? I doubt too many would see it that way and you are in fact welcome to it. For the bulk of this war most STA nations were reduced to 2 nukes a day against multiple opponents who generaly had just one war each and who were not being nuked at all on many days while the STA nations were being nuked every day and STILL kicking their asses. And despite that lack of nukes the 45 STA nations STILL handed out far and away the greatest average damage dealt per alliance nation in this war. YOUR lack of ambition and any conviction that could rationally attract any respect reflects poorly on you and your entire alliance though I wont go so far as to proclaim them all to be like you since i'm only responding to your frankly non sensical statement quoted above.

Confirmed 100%

Spot filled.

Immediate opening in a white trade circle about to lose a member to inactivity. Currently circle is a 5BR military setup due to current wars and will revert to 3BR population booster in peace time.

Confirming this is accurate. Good work and thanks for posting it so quickly.

Not sure now if I was messing it up but tried with ie instead of firefox and it worked. 100% effectiveness. Good job.

I m getting this on both base and colony.

Confirming that gives 100% effectiveness. Thanks.

Cancel that result, I just noticed I missed the negative in front of the latitude.

Anyone got any idea why I still have only 50% effectiveness even after changing the longitude and atitude in the URL to the same figure you guys are using?

What makes you think STA should be happy about anyone brokering any peace? STA were prepared to carry this on for a year or more and you think it's STA and not others who are happy to get out of it? I suspect those who would have been on the sharp end of STA attention in the next couple of weeks or so are the happy ones. Maybe you should ask their opinion.

He's not "playing" anything, I happen to know him and his way of thinking considerably better than you do and I can assure you neither he nor his allaince has the slightest bit of interest in any "coallitions" If he did STA would have been involved long before they were but the reality is his interest lies in only one direction and that's assisting just one alliance in specific circumstances and that's what he has done. Whether or not you can grasp the perfectly simple reality he is clearly stating is irrelevant because the majority who have don't have any side to take on this issue grasp it instantly. Thus any inability to comprehend what he is saying would appear to be out of step with the average comprehension level around here. I presume that's where the idiot reference comes in.

"Tigers are excellent swimmers, and are able to carry prey through the water."

Za Sibir!

I don't have the slightest shred of interest in anybody's propoganda nor experiments and incidentally i'm not the noob sitting with less than a days worth of bills. If I were my alliance would have me hung drawn and quartered for being such a waste of pixels but I think my question is indeed answered. Your alliances way of life tolerates such behaviour while mine does not.

Just out of curiosity and I mean no offence here but does part of your alliances way of life include not bothering to keep a cash reserve for emergencies such as that you now find yourself in? In my alliance it's written law that we have an ample warchest.

Give almost everyone who takes part and shows a decent level of activity something like tech in SE and you will see significantly more interest. There would have to be some sort of acceptable activity quota for this to work or you would simply get people parking a nation and looking at it once every 3 weeks to collect. Activity could perhaps be judged by a combination of bill paying and collecting regularly as well as levels of attacking and defending casualties. Which incidentally if the attacking casualties could somehow be linked to a required activity level might go some way to discouraging the persistent turtlers. If finishing inside the top 50% got everyone some sort of attractive SE benefit there would cerainly be more participants. Say a few hundred tech or something for the top 5% then less for those over 5% up to 10% and gradually less for a top 20% finish decreasing each 10% up to 50% But as I mentioned there would have to be some sort of activity measurement to qualify. I don't want people just sticking a nation in and never playing.

WOW, you really don't like it when you can't sit collecting for the first 3 weeks of a round with no wars then attack an alliance just a matter of days out of war. We all know what your idea of a fun war is and it's certainly not parity. What you did to SUN last round was as low it gets and now you have the nerve to complain about anything at all? The hypocrisy is thick and somewhat sickly.

[quote name='Masterof9puppets' timestamp='1358645859' post='3080469'] Heh I was involved that time as well. [/quote] Excellent. So you're well aware it's total crap that absolutely no one ever sees as a favour and that the response to it is absolutely typical. You need to enlighten the delusional around here who are trying to pretend otherwise that they're making a complete tit of themselves.

[quote name='Neo Uruk' timestamp='1358645046' post='3080451'] Because you're pretending us burning would be better for the world. And it wouldn't be as you've demonstrated by this clear act of barely warranted aggression. You tried no forms of diplomacy and instead jumped onto someone who was helping.you in a fight. [/quote] Allow me to enlighten you from the perspective of an alliance who has been through the exact same thing a couple of years ago or so which also included kronos. They did exactly the same thing to us. Their members were roguing our nations then having their slots filled by kronos nations and you know what? NOT A SINGLE ONE OF US THOUGHT THEY WERE DOING US A FAVOUR!!! That too almost came to war so if you can seriously sit there and imagine for even a fleeting moment that anybody but you sees this type of crap for anything but what it is. CRAP!!! Then you're fooling no one but yourself.

I don't need to prove anything to the likes of you, I already exposed what you are in many ways when you first claimed you getting your ass kicked from an even footing was a delusion and I proved it with a post YOU had made. That means YOU'RE delusional I expect, RIGHT??? [quote] [b]To:[/b] [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1000030"]OK Guy[/url] [b]From:[/b] [b]Date:[/b] 1/9/2013 11:58:06 AM [b]Subject: [/b]OWF stuff [b]Message:[/b] Winning an argument on owf with op is a waste of time my friend. I've been playing TE since round 2. OP always had an excuse for a stomp. Let me guess how it went, Your alliance just comes out of war. OP holds a copy of pre blitz stats OP spies all your stuff out OP immediately declares OP does a huge buildup, OP posts pre buildup alliance stats. OP suggests it was a fair fight All OP members then gang up on you in OWF. If that doesn't worK , they look to get you an OWF ban or warn [/quote] The likes of you doesn't need to know who this person is, the likes of you would then simply wait till HE was just out of war and had half the infra to attack him too. People know I haven't made anything up here and the fact is why would I? The reality is good enough for my purposes but he may have a point in me continually illustrating what everyone already appears to know. You can grunt your mindless drivel all round long and nothing will change that. You're outed.

[quote name='14dwright' timestamp='1357770279' post='3073373'] I admire your spirit but the war is over... You do realize that, right? lol [/quote] Really? So what are you lot doing here asking what i'm doing here? See how ludicrous you people are no matter what''s going on? But thanks for continuing it. You see I know there are others of your alliance squirming and wanting it to stop but YOU Einstein blundered in and gave me the opportunity all over again to show everyone what you are. Many thanks. I actually have a message from someone else in the game who apparently has experience of you yellow cowards and your ingrained habit of being yellow slime. A quote. [quote]Winning an argument on owf with op is a waste of time my friend. I've been playing TE since round 2. OP always had an excuse for a stomp. Let me guess how it went, Your alliance just comes out of war. OP holds a copy of pre blitz stats OP spies all your stuff out OP immediately declares OP does a huge buildup, OP posts pre buildup alliance stats. OP suggests it was a fair fight All OP members then gang up on you in OWF. If that doesn't worK , they look to get you an OWF ban or warn [/quote] And there you have it, cowards of the game far less the round. But bring it on if you want, I will continue kicking your ass right here just like I flattened your paul and his cohorts in a previous round when it was on an even footing. HERE it's an even footing and that must break your yellow hearts.

An interesting pride in being recipeints of the title.. Spineless is as spineless does I suppose. But continue reminding all and sundry what you are because it saves me the task of doing so though I will no doubt help if you need any help. Like if there were an instance of you forgetting again and trying to masquerade as anything but.