TigerBaby

Simple avenue to demonstrate his superiority isn't there. Decom his 25 nukes then declare on 3 STA nations to put himself in an equivalent position to that you were in then "pound them all to hell" But I susepct everyone arpound here already knows that wont be happening. We're talking about a non entity who couldn't without nukes take on one alone far less the 3 nations you were engaged with while you had just two nukes a day to their dozens. I volunteer to be one of the 3 and if this non entity can prove his superiority in the fashion described I will demand you hand over STA leadership to him. And in fact fact it can be done. I have recently been handing ass kickings to multiple nations myself while they had dozens of nukes to my two a day. That's why both you and I are in the top group of damage handed out this war and that non entity loser isn't. But again I have given him a way to prove me wrong. But don't expect the courage to take that opportunity to be forthcoming.

Laughing my socks off. Tell me what sort of alternate reality does a babbling non entity like you exist in? Let me give you some statistics from this war. This is you, a total of 7 wars and a total 73,722 damage dealt. And this is Tyga, 21 wars against mu;ltiple opponents every time and damage dealt 248,177 which was more than the damage he took despite the fact he had nothing but two daily nukes the majority of which were thwarted. He dealt more damage than ALL nations in the war except for 10. Unlike you who is so far down the rankings and so irrelevant I didn't even bother checking the loser ranking you have. But continue with that type of absurdity because believe me everyone on both sides knows how ludicrous it is. And actually if you want come ahead. Come pound me to hell. You and me one on one. You have thousands more tech than I do and 25 nukes to my zero. Not even a contest right? How could you lose? Oh wait a minute I know how. Because then you would find out what it's like to be a REAL loser facing someone who has only one war against a loser like you despite the fact you're still outgunning them.

What does that even mean? His ambition is simply to stick to his word and assist allies he has enetered into an agreement with which he has done against the odds then that somehow refllects poorly on his convictions? That even makes sense to you? And out of curiosity what exactly is your ambition? Duck and hide unless you can get into a situation where you outnumber the opposition by 10 to 1? That's an admirable ambition? I doubt too many would see it that way and you are in fact welcome to it. For the bulk of this war most STA nations were reduced to 2 nukes a day against multiple opponents who generaly had just one war each and who were not being nuked at all on many days while the STA nations were being nuked every day and STILL kicking their asses. And despite that lack of nukes the 45 STA nations STILL handed out far and away the greatest average damage dealt per alliance nation in this war. YOUR lack of ambition and any conviction that could rationally attract any respect reflects poorly on you and your entire alliance though I wont go so far as to proclaim them all to be like you since i'm only responding to your frankly non sensical statement quoted above.

Confirmed 100%

Spot filled.

Immediate opening in a white trade circle about to lose a member to inactivity. Currently circle is a 5BR military setup due to current wars and will revert to 3BR population booster in peace time.

Confirming this is accurate. Good work and thanks for posting it so quickly.

Not sure now if I was messing it up but tried with ie instead of firefox and it worked. 100% effectiveness. Good job.

I m getting this on both base and colony.

Confirming that gives 100% effectiveness. Thanks.

Cancel that result, I just noticed I missed the negative in front of the latitude.

Anyone got any idea why I still have only 50% effectiveness even after changing the longitude and atitude in the URL to the same figure you guys are using?

What makes you think STA should be happy about anyone brokering any peace? STA were prepared to carry this on for a year or more and you think it's STA and not others who are happy to get out of it? I suspect those who would have been on the sharp end of STA attention in the next couple of weeks or so are the happy ones. Maybe you should ask their opinion.

He's not "playing" anything, I happen to know him and his way of thinking considerably better than you do and I can assure you neither he nor his allaince has the slightest bit of interest in any "coallitions" If he did STA would have been involved long before they were but the reality is his interest lies in only one direction and that's assisting just one alliance in specific circumstances and that's what he has done. Whether or not you can grasp the perfectly simple reality he is clearly stating is irrelevant because the majority who have don't have any side to take on this issue grasp it instantly. Thus any inability to comprehend what he is saying would appear to be out of step with the average comprehension level around here. I presume that's where the idiot reference comes in.

"Tigers are excellent swimmers, and are able to carry prey through the water."